rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)

UTR_LM evaluated zero-shot by Wang et al. 2026.

36 evaluations · 36 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

36 evaluations · 36 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Sorted by AUROC (CLS embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetAUROC (CLS embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)AUROC (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)F1 (attention; mean over structures)F1 (attention; median over structures)F1 (CLS embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)F1 (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)MCC (attention; mean over structures)MCC (attention; median over structures)MCC (CLS embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)MCC (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)One minus overlap ratio (CLS embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)One minus overlap ratio (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)Absolute spearman correlation (PLL-D; mean over assays)Absolute spearman correlation (PLL-D; median over assays)Absolute spearman correlation (WT-LLR; mean over assays)Absolute spearman correlation (WT-LLR; median over assays)AUROC (PLL-D; mean over assays)AUROC (PLL-D; median over assays)AUROC (WT-LLR; mean over assays)AUROC (WT-LLR; median over assays)MCC (PLL-D; mean over assays)MCC (PLL-D; median over assays)MCC (WT-LLR; mean over assays)MCC (WT-LLR; median over assays)
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), CLS embedding, AUC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)0.813±0.001 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), CLS embedding, AUC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)0.637±0.001Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, AUC (mean over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.558±0.049Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, AUC (median over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.542Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, MCC (mean over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.084±0.066Not reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, MCC (median over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.063
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, SR (mean over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.116±0.097Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, SR (median over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.087Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, AUC (mean over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.551±0.049Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, AUC (median over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.533Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, MCC (mean over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.071±0.068Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, MCC (median over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.049Not reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, SR (mean over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.103±0.097Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, SR (median over assays), RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.067Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (mean over structures), TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reported0.029±0.032 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (median over structures), TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reported0.022 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, MCC (mean over structures), TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.016±0.037 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, MCC (median over structures), TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.006 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (mean over structures), TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reported0.016±0.018Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (median over structures), TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reported0.011Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, MCC (mean over structures), TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.006±0.018Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, MCC (median over structures), TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, 1 − OR (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.631±0.000 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, AUC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reported0.801±0.000 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, F1 (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.729±0.000 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, MCC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.405±0.001 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), FFT embedding, 1 − OR (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.354±0.003Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), FFT embedding, AUC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reported0.650±0.001Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), FFT embedding, F1 (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.669±0.000Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), FFT embedding, MCC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.077±0.001Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), CLS embedding, 1 − OR (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.649±0.001 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), CLS embedding, F1 (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.739±0.001 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), CLS embedding, MCC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.445±0.002 (best in column)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), CLS embedding, 1 − OR (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.340±0.002Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), CLS embedding, F1 (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.667±0.000Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)EvaluationWang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), CLS embedding, MCC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs), ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.042±0.003Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
All 36 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, AUC (mean over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.558±0.049 AUROC (WT-LLR; mean over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.049

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (WT-LLR, AUC, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t10-auc-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 10, row 'UTR_LM', column 'AUC' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, AUC (median over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.542 AUROC (WT-LLR; median over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (WT-LLR, AUC, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t10-auc-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 10, row 'UTR_LM', column 'AUC' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, MCC (mean over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.084±0.066 MCC (WT-LLR; mean over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.066

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (WT-LLR, MCC, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t10-mcc-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 10, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, MCC (median over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.063 MCC (WT-LLR; median over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (WT-LLR, MCC, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t10-mcc-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 10, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, SR (mean over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.116±0.097 Absolute spearman correlation (WT-LLR; mean over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.097

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (WT-LLR, SR, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t10-sr-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 10, row 'UTR_LM', column 'SR' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), WT-LLR, SR (median over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.087 Absolute spearman correlation (WT-LLR; median over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (WT-LLR, SR, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t10-sr-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 10, row 'UTR_LM', column 'SR' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, AUC (mean over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.551±0.049 AUROC (PLL-D; mean over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.049

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (PLL-D, AUC, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t11-auc-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 11, row 'UTR_LM', column 'AUC' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, AUC (median over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.533 AUROC (PLL-D; median over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (PLL-D, AUC, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t11-auc-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 11, row 'UTR_LM', column 'AUC' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, MCC (mean over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.071±0.068 MCC (PLL-D; mean over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.068

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (PLL-D, MCC, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t11-mcc-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 11, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, MCC (median over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.049 MCC (PLL-D; median over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (PLL-D, MCC, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t11-mcc-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 11, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, SR (mean over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.103±0.097 Absolute spearman correlation (PLL-D; mean over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.097

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (PLL-D, SR, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t11-sr-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 11, row 'UTR_LM', column 'SR' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot fitness, RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays), PLL-D, SR (median over assays)
Dataset: RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.067 Absolute spearman correlation (PLL-D; median over assays)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot fitness on RNAGym ncRNA DMS assays (31 assays) (PLL-D, SR, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t11-sr-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 11, row 'UTR_LM', column 'SR' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (mean over structures)
Dataset: TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.029±0.032 F1 (attention; mean over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.032

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS test set (70 PDB structures) (attention, F1 score, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t4-f1-score-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 4, row 'UTR_LM', column 'F1 score' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (median over structures)
Dataset: TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.022 F1 (attention; median over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS test set (70 PDB structures) (attention, F1 score, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t4-f1-score-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 4, row 'UTR_LM', column 'F1 score' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, MCC (mean over structures)
Dataset: TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.016±0.037 MCC (attention; mean over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.037

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS test set (70 PDB structures) (attention, MCC, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t4-mcc-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 4, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS test set (70 PDB structures), attention, MCC (median over structures)
Dataset: TS test set (70 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.006 MCC (attention; median over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS test set (70 PDB structures) (attention, MCC, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t4-mcc-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 4, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (mean over structures)
Dataset: TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.016±0.018 F1 (attention; mean over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.018

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (attention, F1 score, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t5-f1-score-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 5, row 'UTR_LM', column 'F1 score' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, F1 score (median over structures)
Dataset: TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.011 F1 (attention; median over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (attention, F1 score, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t5-f1-score-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 5, row 'UTR_LM', column 'F1 score' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, MCC (mean over structures)
Dataset: TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.006±0.018 MCC (attention; mean over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.018

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (attention, MCC, mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t5-mcc-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 5, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Mean ± Std)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot secondary structure, TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures), attention, MCC (median over structures)
Dataset: TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (Wang et al. 2026)
0 MCC (attention; median over structures)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot secondary structure on TS-Hard test set (15 PDB structures) (attention, MCC, median)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t5-mcc-median

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 5, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC' (Median)
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, 1 − OR (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs)
Dataset: RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.631±0.000 One minus overlap ratio (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot family classification on RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (FFT embedding, 1 − OR, sampled-mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t6-1-or-sampled-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 6, row 'UTR_LM', column '1 − OR'
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, AUC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs)
Dataset: RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.801±0.000 AUROC (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot family classification on RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (FFT embedding, AUC, sampled-mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t6-auc-sampled-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 6, row 'UTR_LM', column 'AUC'
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, F1 (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs)
Dataset: RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.729±0.000 F1 (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot family classification on RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (FFT embedding, F1, sampled-mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t6-f1-sampled-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 6, row 'UTR_LM', column 'F1'
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot family classification, RfamSample (561 Rfam families), FFT embedding, MCC (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs)
Dataset: RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.405±0.001 MCC (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.001

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot family classification on RfamSample (561 Rfam families) (FFT embedding, MCC, sampled-mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t6-mcc-sampled-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 6, row 'UTR_LM', column 'MCC'
Configuration: UTR_LM (zero-shot, Wang et al. 2026)Protocol: Wang et al. 2026 zero-shot RNA type classification, ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs), FFT embedding, 1 − OR (mean over repeated random samplings of sequence pairs)
Dataset: ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (Wang et al. 2026)
0.354±0.003 One minus overlap ratio (FFT embedding; mean over random samplings of sequence pairs)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: SD 0.003

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

UTR_LM zero-shot RNA type classification on ArchiveII-Nr (1273 RNAs) (FFT embedding, 1 − OR, sampled-mean)

lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-protocol-t7-1-or-sampled-mean

Aggregation: Not reported

Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models: Supplementary Information; Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning · Supplementary Table 7, row 'UTR_LM', column '1 − OR'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lit-rna-20261011-rnalm-zeroshot-config-utr-lm-wang2026

areas
rna-transcriptomes
contexts
research
method types
foundation_model
reported name
UTR_LM
foundation model eligible
true
parameters
Pretrained weights used without fine-tuning (zero-shot); attention maps, embeddings or token logits read out as described in the Methods
access reuse
Public download location listed in Supplementary Table 1
source locator
Supplementary Table 1 row 'UTR_LM'
checkpoint
https://github.com/a96123155/UTR-LM (downloaded 2024/8/12; version column '-'; variant label in results tables 'none')
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: No version column entry for this checkpoint in Supplementary Table 1
Related records

Suggest a correction