rewirebio.iobenchmarks

Omics and molecular biologyRelease 2026-10-12

Biological model benchmark database

Find biological models, see how they were tested and inspect the evidence behind each result.

Search and browse the database

Search in models
More record types
Methods and evaluation records

Biological models and model families. Evaluated versions, configurations and pipelines are linked separately.

Narrow these results

240 matching models

Model · Not yet reviewed

AlphaGenome

AlphaGenome predicts regulatory activity and variant effects from long DNA sequences, with outputs for expression, splicing, chromatin and contact maps.

DNA and genomes · 4 sources

44 evaluations · 52 results

Model · Not yet reviewed

Boltz-2

Boltz predicts biomolecular complex structures; Boltz-2 also predicts binding affinity.

Molecular interactions · 7 sources

1 evaluation · 1 result

Model · Not yet reviewed

Chai-1

Chai-1 predicts the structures of biomolecular complexes containing proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules.

Proteins and complexes · Molecular interactions · 3 sources

5 evaluations · 5 results

Model · Not yet reviewed

DiffDock-L

DiffDock-L places small-molecule ligands in protein structures using a diffusion docking model.

Molecular interactions · 3 sources

1 evaluation · 1 result

Model · Not yet reviewed

ESM-2

ESM-2 is a family of protein sequence encoders that produce representations for downstream protein analyses.

Proteins and complexes · 4 sources

3 evaluations · 11 results

Model · Not yet reviewed

ESMFold

ESMFold predicts protein structures directly from amino-acid sequence using ESM-2 representations.

Proteins and complexes · 4 sources

14 evaluations · 14 results

Model · Not yet reviewed

Evo 2

Evo 2 models and generates DNA over long contexts at single-nucleotide resolution.

DNA and genomes · Microbes and communities · 5 sources

87 evaluations · 92 results

Model · Not yet reviewed

GEARS

GEARS predicts transcriptional responses to single- and multi-gene perturbations from single-cell perturbation screens.

Cells and tissues · 4 sources

1 evaluation · 2 results

Model · Not yet reviewed

Geneformer

Geneformer represents single-cell transcriptomes as ranked genes and learns contextual gene and cell representations.

Cells and tissues · 3 sources

5 evaluations · 5 results

Model · Not yet reviewed

METAGENE-1

METAGENE-1 is an autoregressive DNA/RNA sequence model trained on wastewater metagenomic data.

Microbes and communities · 5 sources

No evaluations linked in this release

Database freshness

Last published update
No verified publication receipt.
Last completed evidence sweep
No completed sweep recorded.
Next planned review
Europe/London · planned · automation not active

Latest attempt: blocked (1 October 2026). This does not advance the completed sweep date.

A monthly sweep does not mean every record was reverified.

How to read the evidence

Coverage: records and linked evaluations

67,462 records across 17 record types. These counts describe catalogue coverage, not model performance.

Records by kind

  • result38,613
  • evaluation17,369
  • configuration4,301
  • claim2,429
  • source1,257
  • protocol1,018
  • dataset550
  • task495
  • method448
  • dataset subset409
  • model247
  • pipeline125
  • baseline83
  • benchmark82
  • use case26
  • service6
  • evaluator4

Records by research area

  • DNA and genomes11,299
  • RNA and transcriptomes5,549
  • Proteins and complexes4,884
  • Single cell2,093
  • Cells and tissues2,064
  • Microbes and communities1,925
  • Molecular interactions1,409
  • Biological networks1,228
  • Protein function884
  • Glycans764

Benchmark evidence coverage

54 of 82 benchmarks have linked evaluations in this release. Zero means no evaluation is linked here, not that the benchmark has never been used.

  • NABench1,101
  • Virtual Cell Challenge 20261,048
  • mRNABench696
  • ProteinBench556
  • CAFA438
  • BEELINE384
  • Open Problems384
  • GlycanML323
  • DART-Eval316
  • SegmentNT human genome annotation294
  • GUE280
  • BEACON221
  • ProteinGym187
  • FLIP155
  • FLIP2149
  • PFMBench141
  • BEND105
  • CAPRI100
  • HEST-Benchmark100
  • CASP90
  • Gene-MTEB80
  • PerturBench76
  • scIB69
  • TDC molecular tasks66
  • MSAlign molecular retrieval evaluations63
  • ATOM3D57
  • RhoFold+ CASP15 natural RNA comparison56
  • Cancer Immunotherapy Data Science Challenge54
  • TAPE50
  • FoldBench45
  • FramePool translation-prediction study30
  • MassSpecGym24
  • Plant Genomic Benchmark (PGB)24
  • GENEB22
  • scTab published annotation evaluation21
  • Genomic Benchmarks18
  • CAMI16
  • ClusPro Protein Docking Benchmark 5.0 study16
  • RhoMax original wavelength-prediction comparison15
  • scFoundation cell-type annotation comparison14
  • Talos 2026 evaluation and reanalysis study14
  • Genie 3 unconditional short monomer comparison13
  • ESMFold2 Runs N’ Poses comparison11
  • PLINDER7
  • MIST CANOPUS molecular retrieval6
  • MPRabc K562 enhancer–gene evaluation6
  • ENIGMA 2024 BRCA evidence-calibration and curation study5
  • OncoVI 2026 oncogenicity evaluation study5
  • Jores plant promoter prediction study4
  • CIViC MCP 2026 evidence-retrieval evaluation3
  • Benet-Pages 2025 BRCA1/BRCA2 VUS reclassification study2
  • HECTOR 2026 preprint: ENIGMA Evidence Repository validation1
  • Hu 2026 BRCA2 integrated functional-data classification study1
  • So 2024 BRCA1 ClinVar conflicting-variant reinterpretation study1
  • AlphaFold and ESMFold benchmark on PDB structures released 2022 to 20240
  • Davis and KIBA drug-target affinity benchmark (DeepDTA split)0
  • DeepProtein benchmark0
  • Differential expression classification benchmark for perturbation models (Sun et al. 2026)0
  • DNALONGBENCH0
  • GenBench0
  • GENEB leaderboard0
  • GFMBench-API0
  • GUANinE v1.10
  • Harmonised single-cell and spatial foundation model benchmark (Chen et al. 2026)0
  • LiPP benchmark set0
  • M. tuberculosis read classification with standard and custom databases (Hall and Coin 2024)0
  • Mock community taxonomic profiling benchmark (Portik et al. 2022)0
  • Nucleotide Transformer benchmark (18 tasks)0
  • PEtab benchmark collection0
  • PLABench0
  • Plasma mcfDNA sequencing for predicting and diagnosing bloodstream infection in high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)0
  • PRIME viral mutation-space evaluation0
  • Protein embeddings for GNN PPI prediction (OGBl-ppa and HuRI)0
  • Scaffold-Lab unconditional generation0
  • SCMBench0
  • SEQC2 HCC1395 somatic CNV benchmark0
  • Short-read versus host-depleted nanopore mNGS on BALF (Hu et al. 2026)0
  • Static GRN reconstruction from single-cell foundation models (Ye et al. 2026)0
  • TraitGym0
  • Universal antibody-antigen affinity evaluation on AlphaBind (MochiBind study)0
  • ViroBench0
  • Virus profiler benchmark against a shared Virus Pathogen Database (Tisza et al. 2026)0

Published evaluations and rewire evaluations are records in the same database, with their origin shown beside each result. This release includes 38,597 source-checked published results and 12 results from existing rewire runs.

Source checked does not mean independently reproduced. Comparisons require compatible data, protocols and metrics. Missing details stay visible.

Investigate discrepancies

Check whether the data supports replaying a metric, investigating an unexpected result or testing an explanation independently.

Readiness and investigations →

Rewire evaluations

Read the protocol, coverage and limitations behind our corrected splice-variant evaluation.

MFASS v2 evaluation →

Correction history

MFASS v1 is superseded. Its original tables and methods remain available as an archived report.

Archived MFASS v1 report →
Collection coverage and remaining gaps

This is a dated collection, not an exhaustive model census. Models, methods, evaluated configurations and pipelines are listed separately. Counts describe records, not unique checkpoints or independent experiments.

{
  "entity_schema_version": "1.1",
  "entity_migration": {
    "baseline_release": "2026-09-17-5054ddf2a281",
    "note": "Separate models, methods, configurations, pipelines, hosted services, benchmarks, tasks, protocols and evaluators. IDs, printed scores and archived releases remain unchanged."
  },
  "acquisition_review": {
    "date": "2026-09-19",
    "scope": "Nine benchmark result collections; PEtab timing data remains quarantined. Source cells checked independently; not experimental reproduction."
  },
  "run_instructions": {
    "review": "Official source instructions; not executed by rewire",
    "guides": 7,
    "documentation_audits": 39
  },
  "run_recipe_coverage": {
    "recipes": 30,
    "evaluations_with_verified_recipe_links": 9,
    "top_level_benchmarks": 82,
    "official_documentation_or_gap": 36,
    "note": "Source-reviewed instructions and exact applicability links; execution receipts do not establish reproduction of published scores. Production contributions remain disabled."
  },
  "research_generator_sha256": "14d01fcbe7cce144376eeb0be5dc527a5a4ec615ba1c039134eebad74ed56beb",
  "evidence_table_generator_sha256": "53e835a4b212bd058c7eef3215a72e4ddfd8f90d47a813f495b28d11c03b39e9",
  "profile_coverage": {
    "total": 694,
    "fact_status_counts": {
      "source_checked": 3878,
      "unreported": 702,
      "unextracted": 49,
      "unavailable": 0,
      "inapplicable": 247,
      "unclassified": 0
    },
    "note": "Source review applies to individual cited claims. Missing fields and inaccessible evidence remain explicit; profile coverage is not independent experimental verification.",
    "reviewed": 92,
    "limited": 602
  },
  "benchmark_paper_review": {
    "date": "2026-10-12",
    "top_level_benchmarks": 82,
    "benchmark_pages_with_results": 54,
    "benchmark_pages_with_figures": 38,
    "published_comparison_figures": 749,
    "source_checked_result_rows": 38597,
    "scope": "Counts derived from this release through the production relationship and chart gates. Figures are source-specific, and metric rows are not independent experiments. Source review is not reproduction."
  },
  "changelog": [
    "Audit all 17 use cases; add source-reviewed, protocol-specific literature measurements and conventional baselines, with explicit remaining decision and transfer gaps. Automated source review is not independent experimental reproduction or human scientific review.",
    "Add two sourced research use cases linking questions to exact existing evaluations, with separate MFASS and AMFR protocol scopes, explicit clinical evidence gaps and an independently versioned, release-pinned use-case artifact. Add two documentation source records; preserve every prior scientific record and numerical result.",
    "Add four MFASS matched canonical-annotation configurations and 16 exact metric rows on the identical 8,297/8,324 scored subset; retain 23 assembly-orientation exclusions and four canonical transcript-scope exclusions, with pinned automated evidence and separate comparison panels.",
    "Add complete bounded primary-source result tables for BEELINE, CAFA, CAMI, CAPRI, CASP, FLIP2, PLINDER, scIB and provisional Virtual Cell Challenge 2026 validation.",
    "Preserve PEtab timing candidates and four conflicting FLIP2 values in acquisition staging with explicit limitations.",
    "Add append-only linked audit runs, field checks, source retrieval receipts and correction history; unresolved fields remain explicit.",
    "Recover 16 omitted ProteinBench percentage results and correct percent units; original printed and numeric values remain unchanged.",
    "Correct DART-Eval correlation units and remove unsupported standard-deviation labels from TDC printed plus/minus spreads.",
    "Recheck pinned extraction inputs, reject unrecognised cells and authenticate PDF-to-text transformations.",
    "Add complete AgroNT promoter and terminator source tables with CNN baselines, source-backed family links and separate assay comparisons.",
    "Link verified model identities and expose downstream evaluations separately; add 1,620 source-checked numerical rows from 13 bounded primary-source comparisons. Preserve quoted evidence and quarantine conflicting mRNABench localization cells.",
    "Count reviewed metrics from the same source evaluation setup together, retaining all original record IDs and links.",
    "Load individual source-scoped charts, remove cross-protocol pooled rankings, and move findings before detailed instructions.",
    "Review 69 selected profile facts across 18 profiles against pinned primary sources, including exact configuration, split, coverage and uncertainty distinctions. Preserve every result value and keep unresolved metadata explicit.",
    "Add two bounded ProteinGym protocol profiles with 24 sourced facts, distinguishing the 217-assay track from one complete AMFR assay. Preserve numerical results, source-authentication gaps and independent-reproduction limits.",
    "Name nine evaluated methods printed only as an author-year citation (eight ATOM3D comparisons) or an author surname (HEST, Ciga), from the benchmark text and the cited original sources. The ATOM3D RSR scorer is named only as a Rosetta scoring function; its citation conflict and settings stay unresolved. Printed labels remain searchable and auditable; IDs, values, locators and comparison conditions are unchanged. Add sourced DeepDTA and DeepAffinity method profiles.",
    "Preserve archived release bytes, historical URLs and MFASS history. Contribution intake remains controlled separately from catalogue publication.",
    "Add verified research manifests, frozen readiness assessments and reviewed-only investigation contracts. Record IDs and values remain unchanged.",
    "Add a second, additive BRCA1/BRCA2 germline-interpretation evidence intake (issue #343): 42 new source-checked clinical-lane records from five sources (Benet-Pages 2025, So 2024, HECTOR preprint, Hu 2026, Karalidou 2022/MARGINAL source-only), distinguishing reclassification rate, tool agreement, preprint classification concordance and functional-data classification yield from clinical accuracy. Add five new scoped proxy use-case mappings against these records: two for Benet-Pages criteria-version reclassification on a fixed VUS cohort (ACMG/AMP+SVI, then ENIGMA VCEP), one for So 2024 VarSome-vs-CanVIG-UK tool agreement on conflicting BRCA1 missense calls, one for HECTOR preprint agreement with ClinGen eRepo expert calls, and one for Hu 2026 BRCA2 exon 15-26 functional-data classification yield; Karalidou 2022 remains source-only with no mapping added. None of these endpoints establishes clinical accuracy, qualified human scientific review or Rewire execution. All prior scientific records, mapping objects and historic release bytes remain unchanged.",
    "Add a bounded, additive cell-type-annotation-transfer evidence intake (issue #349): Abdelaal et al. 2019 Figure S10 Panel B (34-population inter-dataset, cross-dataset/cross-species-where-applicable brain annotation-transfer comparison), SVMrejection row only (9 percent-unlabeled values across all nine VISp/ALM/MTG train-test combinations; VISp and ALM share a source study, GSE115746, so only the 7 of 9 combinations involving MTG are genuinely cross-study and cross-species), read directly from a page-image render of a separately-sourced supplement-PDF artifact and independently cross-checked before ingestion. Reuses the existing SVMrejection method/configuration records unmodified; adds one new source record, three new dataset records, one new protocol record, nine new evaluation records and nine new result records, plus one new scoped proxy use-case mapping. Scored denominator is explicitly unreported; Table 2's raw per-dataset cell counts are recorded as context only, not a confirmed denominator. Not a known-type accuracy claim, not an unknown-type-detection accuracy claim, and not a superiority claim across methods. All prior scientific records, mapping objects and historic release bytes remain unchanged.",
    "Add a bounded, additive EGFR-NSCLC evidence-retrieval proxy intake (B345/BL345, rewire-benchmarks #25 and #28; use-case-egfr-nsclc-actionability-resistance-evidence): CIViC-Fact v3's post-cutoff within-linked-publication passage-retrieval evaluation (150 candidate CIViC entries submitted/revised 2026-03-03 to 2026-06-09, reduced by sequential source-defined exclusions to 40 scored entries). Nine new clinical-lane records (one source, one dataset, one protocol, two configurations, two evaluations, two results) and one new scoped proxy use-case mapping, alongside the unchanged existing CIViC MCP proxy mapping for the same use case. Both retriever configurations (a fine-tuned MedCPT cross-encoder and a pretrained Qwen3-Reranker-8B) report two linked-paper passage-retrieval results of 37/40 (92.5%) appropriate-content rate on the identical cohort, not two independent cohorts. This is retrieval within each entry's already-identified source publication, not open-corpus literature search, and establishes no EGFR- or NSCLC-specific validation, no clinical efficacy claim, and no close of the benchmark-execution gap tracked separately at rewire-benchmarks #28. Reviewer count, blinding and replicate/seed structure for the manual retrieval judgment are unreported. The code/data repository's root licence metadata is null with no root LICENSE file, but a nested data_builder/LICENSE (GPLv3) exists at a pinned commit; its scope over the dataset/model/experiment components is unestablished and not assumed, and no code/data/model copies were ingested. All prior scientific records, mapping objects, use cases and historic release bytes remain unchanged.",
    "Add a bounded, additive genetic-perturbation-response evidence intake (B334/BL334, rewire-benchmarks #25; focused execution gap rewire-benchmarks #29; use-case-genetic-perturbation-response): PertEval-scFM (Wenteler et al., ICML 2025) Table 1, Norman single-gene section, 2,000 HVGs, three printed AUSPC endpoints (GEARS trained from scratch 0.815+/-0.039, an Xc-plus-co-expression MLP baseline 4.484+/-0.299, a context-mean baseline 4.612+/-0.317, all x10^-2), scoring the perturbation-effect delta=P-Xc rather than raw post-perturbation expression. Twelve new experimental-lane records (one source, one dataset, one protocol, three configurations, three evaluations, three results) and one new scoped proxy use-case mapping, alongside the two unchanged existing GEARS Supplementary Table 6 mappings for the same use case. This is a second, independent, from-scratch GEARS evaluation on a differently-preprocessed dataset, split mechanism and metric from Table 6; the two are not merged. Establishes no prospective experiment-selection hit rate and does not close the focused execution gap tracked separately at rewire-benchmarks #29. All prior scientific records, mapping objects, use cases and historic release bytes remain unchanged.",
    "Add a bounded, additive AMP evidence intake (rewire.it#365; rewire-benchmark-data issues #10-19): nine new use-case definitions (tumour-dna-somatic-variant-detection, tumour-rna-fusion-detection, patient-rna-splicing-validation, diagnostic-dna-pathogen-identification, diagnostic-rna-pathogen-detection, plasma-ctdna-fragmentomics, plasma-ctdna-methylation, cnv-detection-characterisation, diagnostic-genomics-model-execution), transcribed from three research groups' Codex-checked primary-source candidate dossiers (Lancet/Strelka2 virtual-tumour SNV/indel calling; EnFusion Seraseq synthetic reference standard plus a separate NCH clinical-ascertainment mapping; FRASER known pathogenic splicing-event recovery; Karius plasma microbial cfDNA; UCSF respiratory RNA mNGS; DELFI ctDNA fragmentomics; cfMethyl-Seq ctDNA methylation; DRAGEN 4.2 CNV and runtime baselines), plus a bounded Feng et al. 2025 DNA-foundation-model table expansion (Table 1 Acceptor and Donor as two separate tasks, Table 2 Arabidopsis TATA and NonTATA as two separate tasks, Table 5 pathogenic-versus-common SNP AUC/Cohen's d, Table 6 eQTL/sQTL/paQTL/ipaQTL as four separate tasks, 79 task-scoped evaluations and 138 results total) reusing the existing evidence-expansion-dna-foundation-models-2025-5d8ca9bc source unchanged, mapped as nine proxy mappings onto existing use cases (two each for splicing-follow-up and plant-promoter-reporters, one for rare-disease-candidate-ranking, four for regulatory-variant-gene-follow-up). Every preserved source conflict (Lancet/Strelka2 truth-indel counts, EnFusion Table 2 v2/v3 caption and 43.6%/43.8% precision conflicts, DELFI classifier-input wording, UCSF composite-PPA conflict, DRAGEN CNV comparator conflict) stays explicit and unresolved by inference. Automated source review, independently Codex-checked across two review cycles; no qualified human scientific review, no independent experimental reproduction, no broad clinical validation claimed. The 17 prior use cases and 72 prior mapping objects remain byte-identical."
  ],
  "research_lanes": 9,
  "search_entries": 511,
  "legacy_papers": 100,
  "legacy_result_rows": 149,
  "source_inputs": [
    {
      "file": "data/entities/baselines.jsonl",
      "sha256": "1dd9dbb7cb3169bab096e890fdb67e9266dadc97ac1961fbd369ffb19e2f8b17"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/benchmarks.jsonl",
      "sha256": "10045db23430223473a6ba839871de03eabec802c092009d894f61aa78153503"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/configurations.jsonl",
      "sha256": "5818979cefbe13c50d970419754c68443cd5bed7a618d623968faf8ef77cc446"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/dataset-subsets.jsonl",
      "sha256": "516338dd5a8b3829765fdad381d759c436d8ace30fe87af72508896c8cb41c8e"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/datasets.jsonl",
      "sha256": "f98b875ec9ada0ac41c7c2672d1c56a5422dac1faacd455105abc40bf735f106"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/evaluators.jsonl",
      "sha256": "ce75e8e4b4c153b0e8d85e861cbc8da2f50ef92325a9829829de44c445d9b2bd"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/methods.jsonl",
      "sha256": "ceef477ea45ec9b3e5c857feddd92495d3f7f84211bd439397ad210b2be201c4"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/models.jsonl",
      "sha256": "5e21266f18a5be61e924b50dfc9fbad97ad16e303159383e020559cf8b0f5cad"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/pipelines.jsonl",
      "sha256": "c2f846fb6c91bee48415474c3b0ed623875a94f8a04c74f9f80b02772fb4ddd1"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/protocols.jsonl",
      "sha256": "5b2b78687beef74f24215d89f51c0fb8bf566ca4dbef12e0c1e0094722fc3b1a"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/services.jsonl",
      "sha256": "bf366116db97087ba9855ee51bb2892f18404f5df2a84522e5ff9e26cd5f8024"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/sources.jsonl",
      "sha256": "939db72b817609a4d386fd896a7202c353680d222dacb495b93fe87e514ac1fc"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/tasks.jsonl",
      "sha256": "07ed972269aee155ce9bfde3ccd2e7a65032b90831a0f70e5e29bbc1fba09deb"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/entities/use-cases.jsonl",
      "sha256": "1cccc75b1ba319b49bcce0a6fe79be6492e09a48794f20de433da472b7fcf0b8"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/evidence/claims.jsonl",
      "sha256": "84cff02e3458bdf1aaa2aa169f22209dc26cd370847608ca34285c326ae20ead"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/evidence/evaluations.jsonl",
      "sha256": "4642e4f57517a14eeda5d448171f77ea019c194953cc566aeeb6e54fdda1b52a"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/evidence/results.jsonl",
      "sha256": "e9f364904b7de8bd17a747823a4d430297d5200227391c2b34ef860d99a9fa9a"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/provenance/records.jsonl",
      "sha256": "96890532729ca279513e5306b9148be53ffa5e3cb31f8888cf8de0feb013aae1"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/omics/use-cases/sources/mfass-matched-study-intake.md",
      "sha256": "0af394e74888c01dbe2970d2e28b9bbacb4a83d355881feaaa3a704396a2074d"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/omics/use-cases/sources/amfr-pilot-readme.md",
      "sha256": "a3208aa4537e8d28c56f68f4559299f31241c50b8d8b2b3776cba5f1718caa43"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/omics/use-cases/sources/clinical-priorities-2026-09-28.md",
      "sha256": "57ebf436d7d92d349700d7f3cb533b80b88e4e15d0d3129e824bfa3b06ecdab7"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/omics/use-cases/sources/research-priorities-2026-09-28.md",
      "sha256": "1f7c3d2d1e0ba852e4ae725bec2e77e55e0aa81496551242e3fbe9fee7662ae0"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/omics/use-cases/review.json",
      "sha256": "c97804a941ad497d96d18f24ef944286021cd8603678a1088c45544c834c908e"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/research/manifests.json",
      "sha256": "bb5b7f5c8c26d1e1318706243135db8f6e9e5afbda48bf87941535f06c4b8662"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/research/investigations.json",
      "sha256": "37517e5f3dc66819f61f5a7bb8ace1921282415f10551d2defa5c3eb0985b570"
    },
    {
      "file": "data/omics/search-ledger.jsonl",
      "sha256": "043dd9746be19d4e8489a662eeae69cdd10255ae4c1d2ef33a8967359c9ff26f"
    }
  ],
  "use_cases": {
    "schema_version": "1.0",
    "input_sha256": "35f52add6b109da224409bbf706eb584e4b963c80a0c952cc0448d88fc9b3bfc",
    "use_cases": 26,
    "mappings": 376
  },
  "use_case_sources": [
    {
      "file": "use-case-source-0af394e74888c01dbe2970d2e28b9bbacb4a83d355881feaaa3a704396a2074d.md",
      "sha256": "0af394e74888c01dbe2970d2e28b9bbacb4a83d355881feaaa3a704396a2074d"
    },
    {
      "file": "use-case-source-1f7c3d2d1e0ba852e4ae725bec2e77e55e0aa81496551242e3fbe9fee7662ae0.md",
      "sha256": "1f7c3d2d1e0ba852e4ae725bec2e77e55e0aa81496551242e3fbe9fee7662ae0"
    },
    {
      "file": "use-case-source-57ebf436d7d92d349700d7f3cb533b80b88e4e15d0d3129e824bfa3b06ecdab7.md",
      "sha256": "57ebf436d7d92d349700d7f3cb533b80b88e4e15d0d3129e824bfa3b06ecdab7"
    },
    {
      "file": "use-case-source-a3208aa4537e8d28c56f68f4559299f31241c50b8d8b2b3776cba5f1718caa43.md",
      "sha256": "a3208aa4537e8d28c56f68f4559299f31241c50b8d8b2b3776cba5f1718caa43"
    }
  ],
  "research_schema_version": "1.0",
  "total_records": 67714,
  "public_records": 67462,
  "counts": {
    "model": 247,
    "method": 448,
    "configuration": 4301,
    "pipeline": 125,
    "service": 6,
    "benchmark": 82,
    "task": 495,
    "protocol": 1018,
    "evaluator": 4,
    "dataset": 550,
    "dataset_subset": 409,
    "baseline": 83,
    "evaluation": 17369,
    "result": 38613,
    "source": 1257,
    "claim": 2429,
    "use_case": 26
  },
  "quarantined_results": 222,
  "scope_excluded_records": 27,
  "source_checked_results": 38597,
  "rewire_result_rows": 12,
  "scope": "Specialist omics and molecular models; no clinical assistants or standalone medical imaging.",
  "limitation": "A dated discovery and source-transcription review, not an exhaustive census or independent reproduction of external experiments."
}

Download the database

Release 2026-10-12-fcce59cc481b · 2026-10-12

Downloads are hosted on GitHub at the pinned data revision and compressed with gzip.

Original literature downloads

The original 100-paper collection is retained for citation history. These files include six result rows excluded from the current omics scope; use the database release above for the reviewed collection.