rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Contested result

ChromBPNet and Enformer: Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory Variants reverses the order

  • Low severity
  • Not yet reviewed
  • Ordering reversal
  • Different tasks across studies

Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory Variants ranks ChromBPNet above Enformer in 4 of 4 comparisons; other studies rank Enformer above ChromBPNet in 4 of 5.

An automatic lead, not a finding of error. The results below are shown as published, everywhere on the site, until a reviewer decides otherwise.

Which studies agree

GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity… ranks Enformer above ChromBPNet in 4 of its 7 comparisons and ChromBPNet higher in 1; 2 are ties. Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning… ranks ChromBPNet above Enformer in all 4 of its comparisons.

Papers grouped by which system they rank higher: Enformer or ChromBPNetRank Enformer higher: GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity…. Rank ChromBPNet higher: Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning… (disagrees). Mixed: none.Rank Enformer higherMixedRank ChromBPNet higherGUANinE v1.1 revealscomplementarity…GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsComparative Analysisof Deep Learning…Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory Variants
  • Rank Enformer higher (1): GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity…
  • Rank ChromBPNet higher (1): Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning… (disagrees)
  • Mixed (0): none

Each paper sits where at least two thirds of its comparisons point; Mixed means neither model reaches two thirds. The larger, outlined dot is the paper that disagrees.

Comparisons in which each paper scores Enformer or ChromBPNet higherComparative Analysis of Deep Learning… (disagrees): Enformer higher in 0, ChromBPNet higher in 4, 0 ties. GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity…: Enformer higher in 4, ChromBPNet higher in 1, 2 ties.Disagrees: Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning…Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory Variants4 ChromBPNet higher4GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity…GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language models4 Enformer higher42 tie21 ChromBPNet higher1
Enformer higherTieChromBPNet higherNumbers are counts of comparisons; the outlined bar is the paper that disagrees.
Comparisons in Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning… (4)
ProtocolDatasetMetricEnformerChromBPNetHigher
Allelic reporter effect correlation in HeLa (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)HeLa regulatory variant reporter data (Manzo et al. 2025)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect), unitless0.2450.289ChromBPNet
Allelic reporter effect correlation in HepG2 (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)HepG2 regulatory variant reporter data (Manzo et al. 2025)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect), unitless0.1410.295ChromBPNet
Allelic reporter effect correlation in K562 (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)K562 regulatory variant reporter data (Manzo et al. 2025)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect), unitless0.0590.287ChromBPNet
Allelic reporter effect correlation in NPC (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)NPC regulatory variant reporter data (Manzo et al. 2025)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect), unitless0.0080.08ChromBPNet
Comparisons in GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity… (7)

What disagrees

Other studies
rank Enformer above ChromBPNet in 4 of 5 comparisons
This study
ranks ChromBPNet above Enformer in 4 of 4 comparisons
Compared
ChromBPNet, Enformer
Study that disagrees
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory Variants
Other studies
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language models
Rule
Ordering reversal; different tasks across studies
Model identity
Matched across studies partly through links not yet reviewed

The compared numbers

Each value links to its result record and source. Compare values within one protocol; the rule compares rankings, not raw values across protocols.

In the study that disagrees (8)
StudyToolProtocol or benchmarkMetricValue
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsChromBPNet (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in HeLa (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.289
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsEnformer (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in HeLa (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.245
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsChromBPNet (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in HepG2 (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.295
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsEnformer (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in HepG2 (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.141
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsChromBPNet (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in K562 (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.287
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsEnformer (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in K562 (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.059
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsChromBPNet (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in NPC (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.08
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Causative Regulatory VariantsEnformer (Manzo et al. 2025)Allelic reporter effect correlation in NPC (Manzo et al. 2025 Table 1)Pearson (predicted versus measured log2 fold-change of variant effect)0.008
In the other studies (10)
StudyToolProtocol or benchmarkMetricValue
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsChromBPNet-ATAC-F0 (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 cadd-snv, Spearman rho x100 (Table 3)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)17.3
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsChromBPNet-ATAC-F0 (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 cons100, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)41.5
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsChromBPNet-ATAC-F0 (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 cons30, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)47.8
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsChromBPNet-ATAC-F0 (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 dnase-propensity, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)41.5
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsChromBPNet-ATAC-F3 (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 ccre-propensity, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)40.5
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsEnformer (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 cadd-snv, Spearman rho x100 (Table 3)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)17.1
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsEnformer (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 ccre-propensity, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)55.4
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsEnformer (Pre-output) (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 cons100, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)62.4
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsEnformer (Pre-output) (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 cons30, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)74.7
GUANinE v1.1 reveals complementarity of supervised and genomic language modelsEnformer (Pre-output) (1% eval (evaluated with 1% of the training set), GUANinE v1.1)GUANinE v1.1 dnase-propensity, Spearman rho x100 (Table 2)Spearman (GUANinE v1.1 test set)68.1

Follow-up

Current state: Not yet reviewed.

No one has reviewed this finding yet.

How to help resolve this

If you know why these studies disagree, for example a different population, metric or preprocessing step, or you have a corrected value, tell us through the contribution form. A reviewer checks every submission against its source before anything changes, and the step is added to the follow-up above.

Finding discrepancy-9e66c51233d909ab · All contested results · How findings are made and followed up