rewire.itbenchmarks
Task

Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy

Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy. Scored with Accuracy on Zebrafish (random split). 90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

16 evaluations · 16 results

Overview

Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy. Scored with Accuracy on Zebrafish (random split). 90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy

accuracy (fraction) · Higher values are better.

Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy · Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation.

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), metric(accuracy)
  • Results published by the Open Problems project, source checked but not independently reproduced.
  • This covers the label projection task at v1.0.0 only, not the whole Open Problems suite.
  • true_labels and random_labels are controls that bound the scale, not competing methods.
  • Preprocessing is part of the run, so the same method appears once per parameter set.
Comparison details and limitations

Every method Open Problems label projection reports on Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy, scored with Accuracy on Zebrafish (random split).

Automated source review: 2026-09-18. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 12 of 16 matching rows.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
discovery-benchmark-open-problems
Individual claims
openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence

Original source ↗

results, dataset(zebrafish_random), metric(accuracy)

Version: v1.0.0
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:16:30.026457+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-18

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-open-problems

Claim: open-problems-association-zebrafish-random-accuracy

Source artifact SHA-256: e223ab712ff55997a3abe659f280d4ea2952700e767b87e02c434701da9833c1

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: open-problems-task-zebrafish-random-accuracy

areas
cells-tissues
tasks
Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy
metric
Accuracy
metric direction
higher
dataset
Zebrafish (random split)
protocol
90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).
source locator
results, dataset(zebrafish_random), metric(accuracy)
comparison panels
id: open-problems-panel-zebrafish-random-accuracy; title: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy; protocol id: open-problems-task-zebrafish-random-accuracy; dataset id: open-problems-dataset-zebrafish-random-split; metric: accuracy; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: open-problems-result-true-labels-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-majority-vote-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-k-neighbors-classifier-log-cp10k-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-logistic-regression-log-cp10k-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-multilayer-perceptron-log-cp10k-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-random-labels-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-k-neighbors-classifier-log-scran-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-logistic-regression-log-scran-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-xgboost-log-cp10k-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-multilayer-perceptron-log-scran-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-seurat-reference-mapping-sctransform-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-xgboost-log-scran-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-scanvi-seurat-v3-2000-hvg-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-scarches-plus-scanvi-all-genes-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-scarches-plus-scanvi-seurat-v3-2000-hvg-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; open-problems-result-scanvi-all-genes-zebrafish-random-accuracy-accuracy; source ids: expansion-p3-open-problems; source locator: results, dataset(zebrafish_random), metric(accuracy); context: Every method Open Problems label projection reports on Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy, scored with Accuracy on Zebrafish (random split).; caveats: Results published by the Open Problems project, source checked but not independently reproduced.; This covers the label projection task at v1.0.0 only, not the whole Open Problems suite.; true_labels and random_labels are controls that bound the scale, not competing methods.; Preprocessing is part of the run, so the same method appears once per parameter set.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-18
Related records

Suggest a correction