rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

XGBoost (log scran)

XGBoost is a gradient boosting decision tree model that learns multiple tree structures in the form of a series of input features and their values, leading to a prediction decision, and averages predictions from all its trees. Here, input features are normalised gene expression values.

24 evaluations · 24 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

24 evaluations · 24 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Sorted by Accuracy (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetAccuracyMacro F1Weighted F1
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Accuracy, Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)0.969 (best in column)Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Accuracy, Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split)0.953Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Accuracy, Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)0.934Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy, Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)0.865Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Accuracy, CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)0.83Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Accuracy, CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)0.821Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy, Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)0.788Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Accuracy, Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split)0.236Not reportedNot reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), F1 score, CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.842
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Macro F1 score, CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.472Not reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), F1 score, CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.826
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Macro F1 score, CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.766Not reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), F1 score, Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.934
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Macro F1 score, Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.788Not reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), F1 score, Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.969 (best in column)
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Macro F1 score, Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.919 (best in column)Not reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), F1 score, Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.953
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Macro F1 score, Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.796Not reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), F1 score, Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.864
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Macro F1 score, Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.817Not reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), F1 score, Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.298
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Macro F1 score, Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.198Not reported
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), F1 score, Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reportedNot reported0.784
XGBoost (log scran)EvaluationOpen Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score, Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)Not reported0.661Not reported
All 24 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Accuracy
Dataset subset: CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.83 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Accuracy

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), F1 score
Dataset subset: CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.842 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.472 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Macro F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Accuracy
Dataset subset: CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.821 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Accuracy

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), F1 score
Dataset subset: CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.826 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.766 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Macro F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Accuracy
Dataset subset: Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.934 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Accuracy

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), F1 score
Dataset subset: Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.934 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.788 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Macro F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Accuracy
Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.969 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Accuracy

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), F1 score
Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.969 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.919 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Macro F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Accuracy
Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.953 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Accuracy

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), F1 score
Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.953 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.796 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Macro F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy
Dataset subset: Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.865 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy

All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), F1 score
Dataset subset: Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.864 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), F1 score

All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.817 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Macro F1 score

All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Accuracy
Dataset subset: Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.236 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Accuracy

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), F1 score
Dataset subset: Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.298 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.198 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Macro F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy
Dataset subset: Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.788 Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(accuracy)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), F1 score
Dataset subset: Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.784 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1)
Configuration: XGBoost (log scran)Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score
Dataset subset: Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split)
0.661 Macro F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not yet extracted

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

XGBoost (log scran) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Aggregation: Not reported

openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(xgboost), paramset(log scran), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access

Additional methodological details, versions and access terms have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this configuration. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: open-problems-method-xgboost-log-scran

areas
cells-tissues
source locator
results, method(xgboost), paramset(log scran)
missing metadata
checkpoint revision: reason: unreported; parameters: reason: unextracted
Related records

Suggest a correction