Logistic regression (log CP10k)
Logistic Regression estimates parameters of a logistic function for multivariate classification tasks. Here, we use 100-dimensional whitened PCA coordinates as independent variables, and the model minimises the cross entropy loss over all cell type classes.
Overview
Logistic Regression estimates parameters of a logistic function for multivariate classification tasks. Here, we use 100-dimensional whitened PCA coordinates as independent variables, and the model minimises the cross entropy loss over all cell type classes.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
24 evaluations · 24 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Accuracy Dataset subset: CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.878 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), F1 score Dataset subset: CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.875 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: CeNGEN (split by batch) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.511 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Accuracy Dataset subset: CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.89 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), F1 score Dataset subset: CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.891 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: CeNGEN (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.828 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Accuracy Dataset subset: Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.963 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), F1 score Dataset subset: Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.964 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: Pancreas (by batch) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.939 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Accuracy Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.988 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), F1 score Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.988 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.972 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Accuracy Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.98 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), F1 score Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.979 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: Pancreas (random split with label noise) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.896 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHuman pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy Dataset subset: Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.926 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAll lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), F1 score Dataset subset: Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.925 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAll lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.913 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceAll lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Accuracy Dataset subset: Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.248 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), F1 score Dataset subset: Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.288 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: Zebrafish (by laboratory) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.233 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy Dataset subset: Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.843 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(accuracy) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), F1 score Dataset subset: Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.841 f1 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1) |
| Configuration: Logistic regression (log CP10k) | Task: Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score Dataset subset: Zebrafish (random split) (Open Problems label projection split) | 0.711 f1-macro fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and source90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type). Aggregation: Not reported openproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k), metric(f1_macro) |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
Download this releaseTechnical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: open-problems-method-logistic-regression-log-cp10k
- areas
- cells-tissues
- source locator
- results, method(logistic_regression), paramset(log CP10k)
- missing metadata
- checkpoint revision: unreported; parameters: unextracted
Related records
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Macro F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Macro F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Macro F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Macro F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Macro F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Macro F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Macro F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), F1 score
- model: Logistic regression (log CP10k) on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score