Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
Family-level detection of reads from seven divergent virus genomes, modelled with Firth-penalised logistic regression (detected ~ tool x depth + genome); marginal detection probability at 10 and 100 read pairs averaged over genomes, with 95% asymptotic confidence intervals.
Overview
An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
5 recorded evaluations, 10 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.
Results
Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.
All evaluations
5 evaluations · 10 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) · Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026)
Sorted by Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 10 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.
| Tested configuration | Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 10 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) | Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 100 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) |
|---|---|---|
| Metabuli v1.2.0, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026)Evaluation | 1 (best in column) | 1 (best in column) |
| EsViritu v1.3.1, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026)Evaluation | 0.974 | 0.999 |
| Kraken2 v2.17.1, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026)Evaluation | 0.0451 | 0.589 |
| Centrifuger v1.1.1-r309, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026)Evaluation | 0.0117 | 0.198 |
| Sylph v0.9.0, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026)Evaluation | 0.000884 | 0.00347 |
All 10 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Centrifuger v1.1.1-r309, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.0117 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 10 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.00495878224532846 to 0.02719564873770782. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.005072199752721945 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 5 (base_tool 'Centrifuger', read_pairs 10), column 'prob' (cell C5); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: Centrifuger v1.1.1-r309, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.198 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 100 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.1247430998401599 to 0.2996024520084267. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.04452631953737853 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcerna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 10 (base_tool 'Centrifuger', read_pairs 100), column 'prob' (cell C10); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: EsViritu v1.3.1, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.974 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 10 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9472888410150351 to 0.9877770210442621. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.009555569960517363 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEsViritu v1.3.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 4 (base_tool 'EsViritu', read_pairs 10), column 'prob' (cell C4); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: EsViritu v1.3.1, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.999 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 100 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9958883308387158 to 0.9997762702050332. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.0007134219297489364 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceEsViritu v1.3.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 9 (base_tool 'EsViritu', read_pairs 100), column 'prob' (cell C9); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 v2.17.1, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.0451 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 10 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.02256255452587475 to 0.08820897881741546. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.01575080088172684 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 v2.17.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 6 (base_tool 'Kraken2', read_pairs 10), column 'prob' (cell C6); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: Kraken2 v2.17.1, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.589 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 100 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.4695359295150824 to 0.6991817422401287. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.0596107597598103 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken2 v2.17.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 11 (base_tool 'Kraken2', read_pairs 100), column 'prob' (cell C11); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: Metabuli v1.2.0, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 1 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 10 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9975626013544785 to 0.9999866586638343. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.0002398938614360291 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetabuli v1.2.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 7 (base_tool 'Metabuli', read_pairs 10), column 'prob' (cell C7); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: Metabuli v1.2.0, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 1 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 100 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.998667970267063 to 0.9999999447574935. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.00002209870476776148 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetabuli v1.2.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 12 (base_tool 'Metabuli', read_pairs 100), column 'prob' (cell C12); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: Sylph v0.9.0, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.000884 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 10 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.0002455506729957742 to 0.003174226166650207. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.0005770437158860627 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSylph v0.9.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 8 (base_tool 'Sylph', read_pairs 10), column 'prob' (cell C8); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
| Configuration: Sylph v0.9.0, headline setting (Tisza et al. 2026) | Protocol: Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) Dataset: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026) | 0.00347 Recall (model-estimated family-level detection probability at 100 read pairs; marginal mean over seven positive-control genomes) fraction · higher Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.001204394110956901 to 0.009960703944958654. Asymptotic interval from brglm2 estimated marginal means; standard error printed 0.001871995713381193 Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSylph v0.9.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2) rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos Aggregation: Not reported Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Supplemental Table S2, row 13 (base_tool 'Sylph', read_pairs 100), column 'prob' (cell C13); interval columns 'asymp.LCL' and 'asymp.UCL' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.
Methods and evaluation design
Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations
Recorded evaluations
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
- Centrifuger v1.1.1-r309 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- EsViritu v1.3.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- Kraken2 v2.17.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- Metabuli v1.2.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- Sylph v0.9.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
Baseline coverage
Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.
0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.
No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.
- Author-reported evaluations
- 5
Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.
Null control
Proposed control: requires review
Training-set mean where supervised fitting is permitted
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Conventional reference
Proposed control: requires review
Simple features with train-only ridge regression
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)
Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.
Run instructions
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|
No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
2 source records and release history
- EsViritu is a sensitive and specific profiler for viral pathogen detection and genome recovery in metagenomes · Original source · bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.29.755457 v1, posted 2026-09-30; JATS XML
- Tisza et al. 2026 Supplemental Tables S1-S25 (bioRxiv media-1.xlsx) · Original source · bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.09.29.755457 v1 supplementary file DC1 (755457_file02.xlsx)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: rna-pathogen-20261011-tisza2026-protocol-pos
- areas
- microbes-communities
- contexts
- research
- protocol
- A detection is scored when a tool reports the genome's family. Bias-reduced logistic regression (brglm2 AS_mixed), genome as a fixed block, EsViritu as the reference tool; estimated marginal means at 10 and 100 read pairs.
- version
- bioRxiv v1
- source locator
- Methods 'Positive controls'; Supplemental Table S2 caption
- limitations
- Detection is scored at family rank only.; Model-estimated probabilities, not observed proportions; ANI is confounded with genome (one genome per ANI level).; Seven genomes from two families.; The S2 caption does not name the parameter setting; the Results tie the regression to the headline parameters, so the results are attached to the headline configurations.
Related records
- uses data: Positive-control synthetic reads from seven divergent virus genomes (Tisza et al. 2026)
- part of: Virus profiler benchmark against a shared Virus Pathogen Database (Tisza et al. 2026)
- assessment: Centrifuger v1.1.1-r309 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- assessment: EsViritu v1.3.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- assessment: Kraken2 v2.17.1 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- assessment: Metabuli v1.2.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- assessment: Sylph v0.9.0 on Positive-control virus detection by read depth (Tisza et al. 2026 Table S2)
- assessed by: Select a DNA pathogen-identification workflow for diagnostic testing
- assessed by: Select an RNA pathogen-detection workflow for diagnostic testing