Upper respiratory tract samples submitted for routine multiplex PCR in Oxford during winter 2024/25, each sequenced once.
2 evaluations · 14 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.
0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
8 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Access Not inspected Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Denominator 344 Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Population 344 nose and throat swabs; 273 passed batch and internal QC; 260 PCR-positive targets and 38 PCR-negative samples among those passing QC; PCR by Alinity Resp-4-plex, Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus or BIOFIRE FilmArray RP2.1 Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Source location Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Split Independent validation set; thresholds derived on a separate derivation set (38 samples, 104 sequences) Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Version As described in Sanderson et al. 2026 v2 Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Description Upper respiratory tract samples submitted for routine multiplex PCR in Oxford during winter 2024/25, each sequenced once. Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Name Validation set: 344 prospectively collected nasopharyngeal swabs (Sanderson et al. 2026) Context-only references | Clinical validation of a novel metagenomic nanopore sequencing method for detecting viral respiratory pathogens: diagnostic accuracy study Methods 'Respiratory samples for pathogen detection'; Results paragraph 1 and 'Validation Set: Diagnostic performance' paragraphs 1-4 Version: medRxiv 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345651 v2, posted 2026-02-26; JATS XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: rna-pathogen-20261011-sanderson2026-data-validation