Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Configuration
LSTM (no pretraining)
LSTM as evaluated in the cited study. No pretraining; original TAPE paper task-specific supervised head
Sources
tape primary benchmark evidence · Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnSecondary structureOverview
Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.
limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details
Evaluations and results
5 evaluations · 5 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: LSTM (no pretraining) | Task: TAPE Stability Dataset: TAPE Stability source dataset | 0.28 Spearman's rho correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLSTM (no pretraining): Rocklin designed-protein stability Test 17 one-mutation neighbourhoods around candidate proteins; train on broad experimental design rounds Aggregation: Not reported tape primary benchmark evidence · Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnStability |
| Configuration: LSTM (no pretraining) | Task: TAPE Fluorescence Dataset: TAPE Fluorescence source dataset | 0.21 Spearman's rho correlation · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLSTM (no pretraining): Sarkisyan GFP fluorescence Train/validation at most 3 mutations; test 4–15 mutations from the GFP parent Aggregation: Not reported tape primary benchmark evidence · Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnFluorescence |
| Configuration: LSTM (no pretraining) | Task: TAPE Contact Prediction Dataset: ProteinNet CASP12 | 0.19 precision at L/5 fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLSTM (no pretraining): ProteinNet CASP12 CASP12 test, 30% sequence-identity partition; medium/long-range contacts Aggregation: Not reported tape primary benchmark evidence · Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnContact prediction |
| Configuration: LSTM (no pretraining) | Task: TAPE Secondary Structure Dataset: CB513 | 0.71 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCB513 test set; train/test proteins filtered at 25% sequence identity Aggregation: Not reported tape primary benchmark evidence · Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnSecondary structure |
| Configuration: LSTM (no pretraining) | Task: TAPE Remote Homology Detection Dataset: SCOP1.75 fold-level test | 0.12 accuracy fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLSTM (no pretraining): SCOP1.75 fold-level test Held-out evolutionary groups; fold-level classification into 1,195 folds Aggregation: Not reported tape primary benchmark evidence · Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnRemote homology |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
How it works
Evaluation in this paper
No pretraining; original TAPE paper task-specific supervised head
Sources
tape primary benchmark evidence · Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnSecondary structureStrengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Strengths and limitations
Limitations and conditions
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Profile review details
Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.
Stable record: paper-model-c350175769f228b7a1Specifications
Inputs, training, access and other details
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Model type | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Inputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Outputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Parameters | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Known versions | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Training data | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Context limits | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Access | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Code licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Weights licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation in this paper No pretraining; original TAPE paper task-specific supervised head Individual claims | tape primary benchmark evidence Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnSecondary structure Version: 1906.08230v1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Introduction LSTM as evaluated in the cited study. No pretraining; original TAPE paper task-specific supervised head Individual claims | tape primary benchmark evidence Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnSecondary structure Version: 1906.08230v1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
1 source records and release history
- tape primary benchmark evidence · Original source · 1906.08230v1
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: paper-model-c350175769f228b7a1
- areas
- protein-function
- entity level
- method
- configuration type
- reported_configuration
- version
- No pretraining; original TAPE paper task-specific supervised head
- legacy kinds
- model
- entity classification
- review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: evidence-discovery-final-tape; source locator: Table2,p.7,row2(No pretraining/LSTM),columnSecondary structure; ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.