Prospectively collected leftover clinical plasma samples.
2 evaluations · 8 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.
0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
7 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Access Not stated in the inspected text Context-only references | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Population 162 control samples from the same population with no fever or infection within 7 days before or after collection Context-only references | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Source location Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Context-only references | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Split Single prospective cohort; no split Context-only references | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Version As described in Wolf et al. 2026 (consolidated pilot and completion phases) Context-only references | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Description Prospectively collected leftover clinical plasma samples. Context-only references | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Name Control plasma samples without fever or infection (Wolf et al. 2026) Context-only references | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Methods 'Procedures' paragraph 1; Table 3 Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-data-controls