rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Contested result

Tranception and VESPAl: ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design and Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) disagree

  • Low severity
  • Not yet reviewed
  • two-study-conflict
  • different-task

ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design ranks Tranception above VESPAl in 17 of 18 comparisons; Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) ranks VESPAl above Tranception in 6 of 7 comparisons. No other study gives a verdict, so neither is the outlier.

An automatic lead, not a finding of error. The results below are shown as published, everywhere on the site, until a reviewer decides otherwise.

Which studies agree

2 papers rank Tranception above VESPAl in 18 of their 26 comparisons and VESPAl higher in 7; 1 is a tie. Of those papers, Livesey and Marsh 2025 ranks VESPAl higher on its own (6 of 7).

Papers grouped by which system they rank higher: Tranception or VESPAlRank Tranception higher: ProteinGym. Rank VESPAl higher: Livesey and Marsh 2025. Mixed: none.Rank Tranception higherMixedRank VESPAl higherProteinGymProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and DesignLivesey and Marsh 2025Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)
  • Rank Tranception higher (1): ProteinGym
  • Rank VESPAl higher (1): Livesey and Marsh 2025
  • Mixed (0): none

Each paper sits where at least two thirds of its comparisons point; Mixed means neither model reaches two thirds. The larger, outlined dot is the paper that disagrees.

Comparisons in which each paper scores Tranception or VESPAl higherProteinGym: Tranception higher in 17, VESPAl higher in 1, 1 tie. Livesey and Marsh 2025: Tranception higher in 1, VESPAl higher in 6, 0 ties.ProteinGymProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design17 Tranception higher171 tie1 VESPAl higherLivesey and Marsh 2025Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)1 Tranception higher16 VESPAl higher6
Tranception higherTieVESPAl higherNumbers are counts of comparisons; the outlined bar is the paper that disagrees.
Papers compared (2)
PaperRoleRanks Tranception higherRanks VESPAl higherTies
ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design and 6 more records · DOIAgrees1711
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) and 1 more record · DOIAgrees160
Comparisons in ProteinGym (19)
ProtocolDatasetMetricTranceptionVESPAlHigher
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Activity assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4650.429Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Binding assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3490.347Tie
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Expression assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.450.326Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, High MSA depth proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4710.449Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Human proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4550.394Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Low MSA depth proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4210.377Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Medium MSA depth proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4430.411Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Organismal fitness assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4350.403Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Other eukaryote proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4970.472Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Prokaryote proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4140.434VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Stability assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4710.461Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Virus proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4380.403Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, mean over selection types of the per-type mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman (all 217 assays)), unitless0.4340.393Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 1 substitution: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4220.386Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 2 substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.2540.141Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 3 substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3460.321Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 4 substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3250.282Tranception
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 5 or more substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3870.32Tranception
ProteinGym AMFR official zero-shot Spearman snapshotProteinGym AMFR 4G3O official snapshot cohortSpearman, unitless0.3560.228Tranception
Comparisons in Livesey and Marsh 2025 (7)
ProtocolDatasetMetricTranceptionVESPAlHigher
Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missenseLivesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each), percent39.755.2VESPAl
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets), percent44.553.5VESPAl
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against the five top-ranked VEPs (column top_5_winrate; the five are not listed in the table), |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets), percent6.4410.9VESPAl
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, direct assays onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, direct DMS assays only), percent51.948.8Tranception
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, indirect assays onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, indirect DMS assays only), percent39.356.6VESPAl
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, SNV-accessible substitutions only), percent45.151.6VESPAl
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions with gaps filledLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS, SNV-accessible substitutions, missing predictions filled with the VEP's most benign score), percent46.652.5VESPAl

What disagrees

studies
2
Compared
Tranception, VESPAl
Study that disagrees
Other studies
Rule
two-study-conflict; different-task
Model identity
Matched across studies partly through links not yet reviewed

Follow-up

Current state: Not yet reviewed.

No one has reviewed this finding yet.

How to help resolve this

If you know why these studies disagree, for example a different population, metric or preprocessing step, or you have a corrected value, tell us through the contribution form. A reviewer checks every submission against its source before anything changes, and the step is added to the follow-up above.

Finding discrepancy-c50c986603a470b5 · All contested results · How findings are made and followed up