rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Dataset

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)

ClinVar pathogenic and likely pathogenic missense variants against 'putatively benign' gnomAD v4.1 missense variants, in proteins with at least 10 of each.

Evaluation results

85 evaluations · 85 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: 3Cnet (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
20.8% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 434/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ76)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

3Cnet: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI76 (row '3Cnet', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: AlphaMissense (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
77.5% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 818/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ5)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AlphaMissense: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI5 (row 'AlphaMissense', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: AlphScore (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
25.3% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 796/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ71)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

AlphScore: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI71 (row 'AlphScore', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: BayesDel_noAF (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
71.8% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 811/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ11)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDel_noAF: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI11 (row 'BayesDel_noAF', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: BayesDel (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
66.9% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 814/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ22)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDel: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI22 (row 'BayesDel', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: BLOSUM62 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
11.3% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 819/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ83)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BLOSUM62: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI83 (row 'BLOSUM62', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
52.1% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 812/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ45)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CADD_1.7: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI45 (row 'CADD_1.7', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: CADD (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
41.4% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 814/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ63)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CADD: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI63 (row 'CADD', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: CAPICE (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
63.7% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 813/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ27)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CAPICE: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI27 (row 'CAPICE', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: ClinPred (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
62.4% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 812/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ29)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ClinPred: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI29 (row 'ClinPred', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: CONDEL (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
49.9% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 809/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ50)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CONDEL: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI50 (row 'CONDEL', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: COSMIS (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
22.2% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 686/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ74)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

COSMIS: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI74 (row 'COSMIS', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: CPT-1 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
71.7% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 783/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ12)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CPT-1: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI12 (row 'CPT', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: DANN (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
27.9% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 814/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ70)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DANN: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI70 (row 'DANN', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: DeepSAV (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
59.1% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 813/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ33)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepSAV: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI33 (row 'DeepSAV', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: DeepSequence (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
65.9% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 200/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ23)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeepSequence: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI23 (row 'DeepSequence', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: DeMaSk (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
46.5% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 814/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ56)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DeMaSk: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI56 (row 'DeMaSk', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: DEOGEN2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
60.8% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 795/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ32)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DEOGEN2: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI32 (row 'DEOGEN2', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: Eigen (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
54.6% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 738/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ41)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Eigen: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI41 (row 'Eigen', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: Envision (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
42.4% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 805/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ62)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Envision: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI62 (row 'Envision', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: ESCOTT (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
66.9% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 755/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ21)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESCOTT: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI21 (row 'ESCOTT', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: ESM-1b (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
54.3% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 814/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ42)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM-1b: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI42 (row 'ESM-1b', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: ESM-1v (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
61.4% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 814/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ31)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM-1v: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI31 (row 'ESM-1v', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
51.4% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 819/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ46)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM2: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI46 (row 'ESM2', column 'rank_score')
Configuration: EVE (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Protocol: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense
Dataset: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
69.6% Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source: Figure 3 error bars (standard error across comparisons) are not printed

Coverage: 738/819 proteins with at least 10 ClinVar P/LP and 10 gnomAD missense variants scored by this VEP scored ('proteins' column, cell CJ15)

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

EVE: Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missense

Aggregation: Not reported

Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) · Supplementary Material 2, sheet 'Table S8', cell CI15 (row 'EVE', column 'rank_score')

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Research readiness

0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.

Readiness checks, gaps and artifacts

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Metrics are recomputed from the saved predictions: not yet verified
  • Sample annotations are recorded: not yet verified
  • Dependence between samples is assessed: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • A pinned run recipe exists: not yet verified
  • Compute requirements are estimated: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • File checksums match the recorded files: not yet verified
  • Predictions are matched to the right samples: not yet verified
  • Score meaning and direction are confirmed: not yet verified
  • Independent validation data exist: not yet verified
  • Overlap with training data is checked: not yet verified

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Dataset and evaluation context

A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

9 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Access
VEP predictions for these variants deposited at figshare doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28295249 (Data availability); not retrieved in this pass.
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.access

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Label semantics
Positive: ClinVar pathogenic, likely pathogenic, pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Negative: gnomAD v4.1 missense variants, 'putatively benign', mostly rare; the authors note it will include some unclassified pathogenic variants, especially in recessive and incomplete-penetrance genes.
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.label_semantics

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Population
819 human proteins with at least 10 pathogenic or likely pathogenic ClinVar missense variants (0-star and conflicting entries removed) and at least 10 gnomAD v4.1 missense variants that passed the genome or exome filters and were not classed pathogenic.
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Source location
Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Species
Homo sapiens
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.species

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Split
No held-out split; no variants used in VEP training were removed, so clinical-trained VEPs can benefit from circularity (Results).
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.split

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Version
ClinVar obtained 06/08/2024 (date format not stated); gnomAD v4.1
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.version

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Description
ClinVar pathogenic and likely pathogenic missense variants against 'putatively benign' gnomAD v4.1 missense variants, in proteins with at least 10 of each.
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: description

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Name
Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)
Context-only references
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)

Original source ↗

Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability

Version: PMC12016141 (published 2025-04-22; Genome Biol 26:104)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T13:36:01Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: name

Source artifact SHA-256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: vep-lit-20261014-dataset-livesey2025-clinvar-gnomad-819

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
population
819 human proteins with at least 10 pathogenic or likely pathogenic ClinVar missense variants (0-star and conflicting entries removed) and at least 10 gnomAD v4.1 missense variants that passed the genome or exome filters and were not classed pathogenic.
label semantics
Positive: ClinVar pathogenic, likely pathogenic, pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Negative: gnomAD v4.1 missense variants, 'putatively benign', mostly rare; the authors note it will include some unclassified pathogenic variants, especially in recessive and incomplete-penetrance genes.
split
No held-out split; no variants used in VEP training were removed, so clinical-trained VEPs can benefit from circularity (Results).
species
Homo sapiens
version
ClinVar obtained 06/08/2024 (date format not stated); gnomAD v4.1
access
VEP predictions for these variants deposited at figshare doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.28295249 (Data availability); not retrieved in this pass.
source locator
Methods 'ClinVar and gnomAD data'; Results 'Performance of VEPs on clinical variant classification'; Data availability
review
reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent; no human review claimed. Independent Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent, separate from the extraction agent that built this batch. Automated review only. Transcription, not reproduction.; reviewed at: 2026-10-14T15:30:00Z; artifact sha256: 1735ee461ef192d9de67c914e9ad73d72d8aa255ea0e3479eb68cd8631d99fa2; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12016141/fullTextXML; method: ai-assisted-source-review; scope-review; method note: Descriptive fields, identity links and missing-metadata reasons checked against the cited sources.; note: Checked; see the dated review for rulings on identity and method type.
Related records

Suggest a correction