Protocol

BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)

Sensitivity for experimentally labelled splice-disruptive SNVs at tool thresholds matched on genome-wide call rate.

Overview

Sensitivity for experimentally labelled splice-disruptive SNVs at tool thresholds matched on genome-wide call rate.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

8 recorded evaluations, 30 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

8 evaluations · 30 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	Finding	Evidence and details
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.915 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B9; row ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.727 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B17; row Exon_ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.925 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B25; row Intron_ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.833 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B33; row Intron_NonCanon_ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: HAL (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.909 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source HAL on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B2; row HAL, column BRCA1
Configuration: HAL (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.909 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source HAL on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B10; row Exon_HAL, column BRCA1
Configuration: MMSplice (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.978 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MMSplice on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B4; row MMSplice, column BRCA1
Configuration: MMSplice (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.818 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MMSplice on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B12; row Exon_MMSplice, column BRCA1
Configuration: MMSplice (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.986 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MMSplice on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B20; row Intron_MMSplice, column BRCA1
Configuration: MMSplice (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.969 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source MMSplice on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B28; row Intron_NonCanon_MMSplice, column BRCA1
Configuration: Pangolin (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.982 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Pangolin on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B8; row Pangolin, column BRCA1
Configuration: Pangolin (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.909 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Pangolin on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B16; row Exon_Pangolin, column BRCA1
Configuration: Pangolin (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.986 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Pangolin on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B24; row Intron_Pangolin, column BRCA1
Configuration: Pangolin (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.969 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Pangolin on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B32; row Intron_NonCanon_Pangolin, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.955 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B3; row S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	1 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B11; row Exon_S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.953 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B19; row Intron_S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.896 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B27; row Intron_NonCanon_S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: SPANR (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.753 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source SPANR on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B6; row SPANR, column BRCA1
Configuration: SPANR (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.273 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source SPANR on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B14; row Exon_SPANR, column BRCA1
Configuration: SPANR (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.778 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source SPANR on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B22; row Intron_SPANR, column BRCA1
Configuration: SPANR (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.583 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source SPANR on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B30; row Intron_NonCanon_SPANR, column BRCA1
Configuration: SpliceAI (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.982 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source SpliceAI on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B7; row SpliceAI, column BRCA1
Configuration: SpliceAI (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.909 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source SpliceAI on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B15; row Exon_SpliceAI, column BRCA1
Configuration: SpliceAI (Smith and Kitzman 2023)	Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2) Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)	0.986 recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Independent external evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source SpliceAI on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Aggregation: Not reported Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B23; row Intron_SpliceAI, column BRCA1

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

External evaluations: 8

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Training-set class prior where supervised fitting is permitted

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Regularised classifier on simple permitted features, or protocol's conventional reference

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

All evidence (JSONL) (gzip)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release history

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays · Original source · Genome Biology 24:294, published 2023-12-21; PMC10734170 full-text XML
Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Original source · 13059_2023_3144_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx inside the Europe PMC supplementaryFiles zip for PMC10734170

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

areas: dna-genomes
contexts: research
protocol: Label each benchmark variant splice-disruptive (SDV) or neutral as defined by its source study (intermediate variants removed). For each tool, take the score threshold at which it calls 10% of 500,000 random exonic and near-exonic background SNVs (MANE Select, internal coding exons +/- 100 bp) disruptive, and report sensitivity for benchmark SDVs at that threshold, overall and within exonic, intronic, and intronic-without-essential-splice-site variants.
version: Additional file 3 (Table S2) sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV'
source locator: Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', column 'BRCA1'; Methods 'Statistical methods' and 'Random background variant set'
limitations: Sensitivity only: the threshold fixes a genome-wide call rate, not specificity on the benchmark, so precision is not measured.; Per-dataset SDV and neutral counts are not printed in Table S2.; Blank cells (HAL intronic rows, FAS intronic columns) are not results and are not stored.; Masking setting for SpliceAI and Pangolin in Table S2 is not stated.; HAL scores exonic variants only and S-Cap only some variants (56.5% and 61.0% of the background unscored), so their thresholds rest on part of the background, and HAL's all-variant values equal its exonic values.; SpliceAI benchmark scores are from 1.3.1, but its threshold comes from 1.3 precomputed background scores whose distance and masking settings are not stated.

Related records

Suggest a correction