rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)

ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023) as run in the cited comparison.

6 evaluations · 22 results

Overview

ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023) as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 22 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.915 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B9; row ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.727 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B17; row Exon_ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.925 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B25; row Intron_ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.833 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B33; row Intron_NonCanon_ConSpliceML, column BRCA1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.0522 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-fas-exon6-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell C9; row ConSpliceML, column FAS
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.0522 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-fas-exon6-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell C17; row Exon_ConSpliceML, column FAS
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.931 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D9; row ConSpliceML, column MLH1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.816 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D17; row Exon_ConSpliceML, column MLH1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.982 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D25; row Intron_ConSpliceML, column MLH1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.931 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D33; row Intron_NonCanon_ConSpliceML, column MLH1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.262 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F9; row ConSpliceML, column RON
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.292 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F17; row Exon_ConSpliceML, column RON
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.204 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F25; row Intron_ConSpliceML, column RON
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.144 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F33; row Intron_NonCanon_ConSpliceML, column RON
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.802 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E9; row ConSpliceML, column POU1F1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.857 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E17; row Exon_ConSpliceML, column POU1F1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.654 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E25; row Intron_ConSpliceML, column POU1F1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.55 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E33; row Intron_NonCanon_ConSpliceML, column POU1F1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.965 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G9; row ConSpliceML, column WT1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
1 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G17; row Exon_ConSpliceML, column WT1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.938 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G25; row Intron_ConSpliceML, column WT1
Configuration: ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.9 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ConSpliceML on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G33; row Intron_NonCanon_ConSpliceML, column WT1

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: splicing-follow-up-20261009-config-smith2023-conspliceml

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
ConSpliceML (Smith and Kitzman 2023)
foundation model eligible
false
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Precomputed scores matched by position and gene; version not printed
parameters
Transcriptome-normalised threshold calling 10% of 500,000 background SNVs: 0.424 (Table S2 'Thresholds' column C)
source locator
Methods 'Scoring with eight splice effect predictors'; Additional file 3 'Thresholds'
Related records

Suggest a correction