rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)

S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023) as run in the cited comparison.

6 evaluations · 22 results

Overview

S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023) as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 22 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.955 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B3; row S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
1 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B11; row Exon_S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.953 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B19; row Intron_S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.896 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on BRCA1 saturation genome editing, synonymous and intronic SNVs

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell B27; row Intron_NonCanon_S-Cap, column BRCA1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-fas-exon6-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell C3; row S-Cap, column FAS
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on FAS exon 6 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-fas-exon6-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell C11; row Exon_S-Cap, column FAS
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.836 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D3; row S-Cap, column MLH1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D11; row Exon_S-Cap, column MLH1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.874 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D19; row Intron_S-Cap, column MLH1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.517 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MLH1 curated clinical splicing variants

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mlh1-curated-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell D27; row Intron_NonCanon_S-Cap, column MLH1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.133 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F3; row S-Cap, column RON
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.116 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F11; row Exon_S-Cap, column RON
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.142 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F19; row Intron_S-Cap, column RON
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.0763 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on MST1R (RON) exon 11 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-mst1r-exon11-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell F27; row Intron_NonCanon_S-Cap, column RON
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.216 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E3; row S-Cap, column POU1F1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.182 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E11; row Exon_S-Cap, column POU1F1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.231 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E19; row Intron_S-Cap, column POU1F1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on POU1F1 exon 2 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-pou1f1-exon2-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell E27; row Intron_NonCanon_S-Cap, column POU1F1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.952 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G3; row S-Cap, column WT1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.9 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G11; row Exon_S-Cap, column WT1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.969 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G19; row Intron_S-Cap, column WT1
Configuration: S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)Protocol: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA: transcriptome-normalised sensitivity at a 10% background call rate (Smith and Kitzman Table S2)
Dataset: WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA (Smith and Kitzman benchmark set)
0.95 recall
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

S-Cap on WT1 exon 9 saturation MPSA

splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-wt1-exon9-mpsa-tn10

Aggregation: Not reported

Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays; Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Additional file 3 sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV', cell G27; row Intron_NonCanon_S-Cap, column WT1

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: splicing-follow-up-20261009-config-smith2023-s-cap

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
S-Cap (Smith and Kitzman 2023)
foundation model eligible
false
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Precomputed 'sens' scores; version not printed
parameters
Most severe of the dominant and recessive models at essential splice sites; transformed to 1 - score. Transcriptome-normalised threshold calling 10% of 500,000 background SNVs: 0.387096774194 (Table S2 'Thresholds' column C)
source locator
Methods 'Scoring with eight splice effect predictors'; Additional file 3 'Thresholds'
limitations
S-Cap scores only some synonymous variants and variants within 50 bp of a splice site: 61.0% of the background set was unscored, so its threshold comes from the scored part of the background.
Related records

Suggest a correction