reported_summary: splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10
Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
12 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.field reported_summary Context-only references | Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Genome Biology 24:294, published 2023-12-21; PMC10734170 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.field reported_summary Context-only references | Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 13059_2023_3144_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx inside the Europe PMC supplementaryFiles zip for PMC10734170 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of the MOESM3 xlsx member (zip SHA-256 e06758da73eda5d4ba9c61361514ed2d84573bf50df5bf8036102389e019d525; Europe PMC assembles the zip per request). |
| attributes.source_locator Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Context-only references | Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Genome Biology 24:294, published 2023-12-21; PMC10734170 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.source_locator Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Context-only references | Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 13059_2023_3144_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx inside the Europe PMC supplementaryFiles zip for PMC10734170 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of the MOESM3 xlsx member (zip SHA-256 e06758da73eda5d4ba9c61361514ed2d84573bf50df5bf8036102389e019d525; Europe PMC assembles the zip per request). |
| attributes.value Transcriptome-normalised sensitivity varied widely between algorithms, but SpliceAI, ConSpliceML, and Pangolin emerged as consistent leaders (median across datasets of 87.3%, 85.8%, and 79.9%, respectively). Context-only references | Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Genome Biology 24:294, published 2023-12-21; PMC10734170 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.value Transcriptome-normalised sensitivity varied widely between algorithms, but SpliceAI, ConSpliceML, and Pangolin emerged as consistent leaders (median across datasets of 87.3%, 85.8%, and 79.9%, respectively). Context-only references | Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 13059_2023_3144_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx inside the Europe PMC supplementaryFiles zip for PMC10734170 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of the MOESM3 xlsx member (zip SHA-256 e06758da73eda5d4ba9c61361514ed2d84573bf50df5bf8036102389e019d525; Europe PMC assembles the zip per request). |
| description Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source. Context-only references | Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Genome Biology 24:294, published 2023-12-21; PMC10734170 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| description Descriptive fact transcribed from the pinned source. Context-only references | Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 13059_2023_3144_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx inside the Europe PMC supplementaryFiles zip for PMC10734170 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of the MOESM3 xlsx member (zip SHA-256 e06758da73eda5d4ba9c61361514ed2d84573bf50df5bf8036102389e019d525; Europe PMC assembles the zip per request). |
| Relationship: subject splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Context-only references | Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: Genome Biology 24:294, published 2023-12-21; PMC10734170 full-text XML | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: subject splicing-follow-up-20261009-protocol-smith2023-brca1-sge-tn10 Context-only references | Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2 Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 13059_2023_3144_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx inside the Europe PMC supplementaryFiles zip for PMC10734170 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: SHA-256 of the MOESM3 xlsx member (zip SHA-256 e06758da73eda5d4ba9c61361514ed2d84573bf50df5bf8036102389e019d525; Europe PMC assembles the zip per request). |
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-10-6e93f504adfc · Record review: source checked
2 source records and release history
- Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays · Original source · Genome Biology 24:294, published 2023-12-21; PMC10734170 full-text XML
- Smith and Kitzman 2023, Additional file 3 (Table S2) · Original source · 13059_2023_3144_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx inside the Europe PMC supplementaryFiles zip for PMC10734170
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: splicing-follow-up-20261009-claim-smith2023-median-tn-sensitivity
- field
- reported_summary
- value
- Transcriptome-normalised sensitivity varied widely between algorithms, but SpliceAI, ConSpliceML, and Pangolin emerged as consistent leaders (median across datasets of 87.3%, 85.8%, and 79.9%, respectively).
- source locator
- Results 'Benchmarking in the context of genome-wide prediction' paragraph 2
- review
- method: ai-assisted-source-review; method note: Compared with Results P13. Correct as worded. The medians reproduce from the 'all variants' rows of sheet 'Sensitivity 10% SDV' over all six columns (SpliceAI 0.8726, ConSpliceML 0.8584, Pangolin 0.7990), so they include the MLH1 column, which this use case treats as outside scope.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-09; artifact sha256: 5aceff067af63ab59400ade7dd7db563a16fc7f4d6db6fa55d5b34689f7a0769; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10734170/fullTextXML; note: Hand transcription checked against the article text by the independent reviewer.