Model

Optimus 5-Prime

Named prediction model family identified in the cited primary source. Exact fitted configurations and scores are separate records.

8 evaluations · 8 results

Overview

Named prediction model family identified in the cited primary source. Exact fitted configurations and scores are separate records.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

8 evaluations · 8 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Tested model or methodProtocolDatasetEvaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configuration	Protocol and dataset	Finding	Evidence and details
Configuration: Optimus 100	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 25-100nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 25-100nt	0.882 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 100 Human 25-100nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D5; row Human 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: Optimus 50	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 25-100nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 25-100nt	0.7 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 50 Human 25-100nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell B5; row Human 25-100nt, column Optimus 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: Optimus 100	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 50nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 50nt	0.852 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 100 Human 50nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D4; row Human 50nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: Optimus 50	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 50nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 50nt	0.889 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 50 Human 50nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell B4; row Human 50nt, column Optimus 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: Optimus 100	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 25-100nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 25-100nt	0.915 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 100 Random 25-100nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D3; row Random 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: Optimus 50	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 25-100nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 25-100nt	0.743 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 50 Random 25-100nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell B3; row Random 25-100nt, column Optimus 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: Optimus 100	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 50nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 50nt	0.938 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 100 Random 50nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D2; row Random 50nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
Configuration: Optimus 50	Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 50nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 50nt	0.966 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible	Author-reported evaluation · Source checked Methods, coverage and source Optimus 50 Random 50nt Not reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell B2; row Random 50nt, column Optimus 50; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access

Versions and evaluated configurations

Optimus 100 · variant of
Optimus 50 · variant of

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release history

FramePool 2021 primary article · Original source · 2021 journal article XML; PMC8136849.1
FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · Original source · 2021 published S1 XLSX

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc20260930-model-optimus-5-prime

areas: rna-transcriptomes
source locator: S1/S4 Table; Methods Framepool model and Model training; S7–S8 figure captions
review: method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex experimental-use-case curation; date: 2026-09-30; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00; scope: Primary-source transcription and catalogue applicability audit; not human scientific review or independent experimental reproduction.
entity level: family
identity scope: Family/method identity only; no undocumented checkpoint equivalence.

Related records

variant of: Optimus 100
variant of: Optimus 50

Suggest a correction