Optimus 100
Exact named model trained in FramePool paper; 50nt, 25–100nt or combined training as indicated. Predictions use paper truncation rules.
Overview
Exact named model trained in FramePool paper; 50nt, 25–100nt or combined training as indicated. Predictions use paper truncation rules.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
4 evaluations · 4 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Optimus 100 | Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 25-100nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 25-100nt | 0.882 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D5; row Human 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation |
| Configuration: Optimus 100 | Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Human 50nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Human 50nt | 0.852 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D4; row Human 50nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation |
| Configuration: Optimus 100 | Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 25-100nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 25-100nt | 0.915 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D3; row Random 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation |
| Configuration: Optimus 100 | Protocol: FramePool study MRL: Random 50nt Dataset subset: Sample MPRA Random 50nt | 0.938 pearson_r correlation · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported FramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D2; row Random 50nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
Related profile: Optimus 5-Prime. This page retains the exact record and its evaluation context.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship: variant of uc20260930-model-optimus-5-prime Individual claims | FramePool 2021 primary article S1/S4 Table; Methods Framepool model and Model training; S7–S8 figure captions Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 2021 journal article XML; PMC8136849.1 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00 Audit detailsField: Claim: uc20260930-config-family-0658c850293f1460 Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: variant of uc20260930-model-optimus-5-prime Individual claims | FramePool Supplementary Table S1 S1/S4 Table; Methods Framepool model and Model training; S7–S8 figure captions Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation. Version: 2021 published S1 XLSX | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00 Audit detailsField: Claim: uc20260930-config-family-0658c850293f1460 Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked
2 source records and release history
- FramePool 2021 primary article · Original source · 2021 journal article XML; PMC8136849.1
- FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · Original source · 2021 published S1 XLSX
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: uc20260930-framepool-config-optimus-100
- areas
- rna-transcriptomes
- source locator
- See linked evaluation and result locators
- missing metadata
- checkpoint hash: unextracted
- review
- method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex experimental-use-case curation; date: 2026-09-30; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00; scope: Primary-source transcription and catalogue applicability audit; not human scientific review or independent experimental reproduction.
Related records
- variant of: Optimus 5-Prime
- subject: Optimus 100 family identity
- configuration: Optimus 100 Human 25-100nt
- configuration: Optimus 100 Human 50nt
- configuration: Optimus 100 Random 25-100nt
- configuration: Optimus 100 Random 50nt