rewire.itbenchmarks
Result

0.915 pearson_r

Optimus 100 Random 25-100nt Pearson r

Tested configuration
Optimus 100
Protocol
FramePool study MRL: Random 25-100nt
Dataset subset
Sample MPRA Random 25-100nt
Related family profiles
Optimus 5-Prime
Procedure
Not reported
Evaluation
Optimus 100 Random 25-100nt
Coverage
scored: unreported; eligible: unreported
Uncertainty
type: unreported
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedFramePool 2021 primary article; FramePool Supplementary Table S1 · S1 Table cell D3; row Random 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
uc20260930-framepool-protocol-random-25-100nt
Adaptation
Not reported
Scoring implementation
Not reported

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.915
Individual claims
FramePool 2021 primary article

Original source ↗

S1 Table cell D3; row Random 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 2021 journal article XML; PMC8136849.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-30

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 689af3ecab7b5a928eacc5a76d965960708cbb253fc7cdeae463b16d30ffd2e3

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Reported result
0.915
Individual claims
FramePool Supplementary Table S1

Original source ↗

S1 Table cell D3; row Random 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: 2021 published S1 XLSX
Retrieved: 2026-09-30

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00

author reported

Audit details

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 4ed99aebadc607b43fca67bc2c6336cf4f167cc4b9cdd57b0abfcad0d2a06562

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: uc20260930-framepool-result-random-25-100nt-optimus-100

areas
rna-transcriptomes
metric
pearson_r
metric direction
higher
unit
correlation
printed value
0.915
numeric value
0.915
source locator
S1 Table cell D3; row Random 25-100nt, column Optimus 100; main text Evaluating frame pooling on MPRA data identifies Pearson correlation
review
method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex experimental-use-case curation; date: 2026-09-30; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00; scope: Primary-source transcription and catalogue applicability audit; not human scientific review or independent experimental reproduction.
uncertainty
type: unreported
Related records

Suggest a correction