GenBench dataset Coding vs Intergenomic: binary classification, sequence length 500.
7 evaluations · 7 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Caduceus (GenBench) | Protocol: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Dataset: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic | 0.937 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4) fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCaduceus on GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-protocol-short-coding-vs-intergenomic Aggregation: Not reported GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic', column 'Caduceus' |
| Configuration: CNN (GenBench) | Protocol: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Dataset: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic | 0.884 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4) fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCNN on GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-protocol-short-coding-vs-intergenomic Aggregation: Not reported GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic', column 'CNN' |
| Configuration: DNABERT (GenBench) | Protocol: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Dataset: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic | 0.936 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4) fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceDNABERT on GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-protocol-short-coding-vs-intergenomic Aggregation: Not reported GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic', column 'DNABERT' |
| Configuration: DNABERT2 (GenBench) | Protocol: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Dataset: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic | 0.936 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4) fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceDNABERT2 on GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-protocol-short-coding-vs-intergenomic Aggregation: Not reported GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic', column 'DNABERT2' |
| Configuration: GENA-LM (GenBench) | Protocol: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Dataset: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic | 0.932 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4) fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceGENA-LM on GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-protocol-short-coding-vs-intergenomic Aggregation: Not reported GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic', column 'GENA-LM' |
| Configuration: HyenaDNA (GenBench) | Protocol: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Dataset: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic | 0.91 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4) fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceHyenaDNA on GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-protocol-short-coding-vs-intergenomic Aggregation: Not reported GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic', column 'HyenaDNA' |
| Configuration: NT (GenBench) | Protocol: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Dataset: GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic | 0.958 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4) fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported by the source Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNT on GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-protocol-short-coding-vs-intergenomic Aggregation: Not reported GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic', column 'NT' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.
0 of 4 readiness checks met. These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation; a source-checked score alone does not meet them.
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
5 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Population Table 2 row 'Coding vs Intergenomic': Binary classification; training size 75K, testing size 25K, length 500 (as printed; task-level sizes) Context-only references | GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models Table 2, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic' Version: arXiv 2406.01627 version 2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Source location Table 2, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic' Context-only references | GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models Table 2, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic' Version: arXiv 2406.01627 version 2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Split GenBench train and test split (Table 2) Context-only references | GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models Table 2, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic' Version: arXiv 2406.01627 version 2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Description GenBench dataset Coding vs Intergenomic: binary classification, sequence length 500. Context-only references | GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models Table 2, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic' Version: arXiv 2406.01627 version 2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Name GenBench Coding vs Intergenomic Context-only references | GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models Table 2, row 'Coding vs Intergenomic' Version: arXiv 2406.01627 version 2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-data-short-coding-vs-intergenomic