rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Contested result

CARP and VESPAl: ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design and Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) disagree

  • Low severity
  • Not yet reviewed
  • two-study-conflict
  • different-task

ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design ranks VESPAl above CARP in 15 of 19 comparisons; Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) ranks CARP above VESPAl in 6 of 6 comparisons. No other study gives a verdict, so neither is the outlier.

An automatic lead, not a finding of error. The results below are shown as published, everywhere on the site, until a reviewer decides otherwise.

Which studies agree

2 papers rank CARP above VESPAl in 10 of their 25 comparisons and VESPAl higher in 15. Of those papers, ProteinGym ranks VESPAl higher on its own (15 of 19).

Papers grouped by which system they rank higher: CARP or VESPAlRank CARP higher: Livesey and Marsh 2025. Rank VESPAl higher: ProteinGym. Mixed: none.Rank CARP higherMixedRank VESPAl higherLivesey and Marsh 2025Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ProteinGymProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design
  • Rank CARP higher (1): Livesey and Marsh 2025
  • Rank VESPAl higher (1): ProteinGym
  • Mixed (0): none

Each paper sits where at least two thirds of its comparisons point; Mixed means neither model reaches two thirds. The larger, outlined dot is the paper that disagrees.

Comparisons in which each paper scores CARP or VESPAl higherProteinGym: CARP higher in 4, VESPAl higher in 15, 0 ties. Livesey and Marsh 2025: CARP higher in 6, VESPAl higher in 0, 0 ties.ProteinGymProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design4 CARP higher415 VESPAl higher15Livesey and Marsh 2025Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)6 CARP higher6
CARP higherTieVESPAl higherNumbers are counts of comparisons; the outlined bar is the paper that disagrees.
Papers compared (2)
PaperRoleRanks CARP higherRanks VESPAl higherTies
ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design and 6 more records · DOIAgrees4150
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML) and 1 more record · DOIAgrees600
Comparisons in ProteinGym (19)
ProtocolDatasetMetricCARPVESPAlHigher
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Activity assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3950.429VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Binding assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.2730.347VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Expression assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3970.326CARP
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, High MSA depth proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4240.449VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Human proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4170.394CARP
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Low MSA depth proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3310.377VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Medium MSA depth proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3740.411VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Organismal fitness assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3660.403VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Other eukaryote proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3950.472VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Prokaryote proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3810.434VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Stability assays: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.4120.461VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, Virus proteins: mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.2840.403VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, mean over selection types of the per-type mean over proteins of assay-level Spearman (all 217 assays)), unitless0.3690.393VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 1 substitution: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.3910.386CARP
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 2 substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.2130.141CARP
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 3 substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.1720.321VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 4 substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.1590.282VESPAl
ProteinGym v1.3 zero-shot DMS substitutionsProteinGym DMS substitution assays at commit 144fe22 (217 assays)Spearman (ProteinGym zero-shot DMS substitutions, variants with 5 or more substitutions: mean over protein and selection-type groups of assay-level Spearman), unitless0.1620.32VESPAl
ProteinGym AMFR official zero-shot Spearman snapshotProteinGym AMFR 4G3O official snapshot cohortSpearman, unitless0.1650.228VESPAl
Comparisons in Livesey and Marsh 2025 (6)
ProtocolDatasetMetricCARPVESPAlHigher
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets), percent76.153.5CARP
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against the five top-ranked VEPs (column top_5_winrate; the five are not listed in the table), |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets), percent2010.9CARP
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, direct assays onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, direct DMS assays only), percent7348.8CARP
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, indirect assays onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, indirect DMS assays only), percent77.756.6CARP
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, SNV-accessible substitutions only), percent77.251.6CARP
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions with gaps filledLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS, SNV-accessible substitutions, missing predictions filled with the VEP's most benign score), percent71.252.5CARP

What disagrees

studies
2
Compared
CARP, VESPAl
Study that disagrees
Other studies
Rule
two-study-conflict; different-task
Model identity
Matched across studies partly through links not yet reviewed

Follow-up

Current state: Not yet reviewed.

No one has reviewed this finding yet.

How to help resolve this

If you know why these studies disagree, for example a different population, metric or preprocessing step, or you have a corrected value, tell us through the contribution form. A reviewer checks every submission against its source before anything changes, and the step is added to the follow-up above.

Finding discrepancy-09f14773a81cf195 · All contested results · How findings are made and followed up