rewire.itbenchmarks
← Back to results
Task

ProteinBench IF-FITTING-EVOLUTION-DISTRIBUTION-CAMEO-AAR: Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR

Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR. Scored with AAR on CASP, CAMEO and de novo backbones. Inverse folding: recover a sequence for a given backbone. Values are the median over repeated runs.

2 evaluations · 2 results

Overview

Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR. Scored with AAR on CASP, CAMEO and de novo backbones. Inverse folding: recover a sequence for a given backbone. Values are the median over repeated runs.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

ProteinBench IF-FITTING-EVOLUTION-DISTRIBUTION-CAMEO-AAR: Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR

aar (score) · Higher values are better.

ProteinBench IF-FITTING-EVOLUTION-DISTRIBUTION-CAMEO-AAR: Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR · CASP, CAMEO and de novo backbones (ProteinBench split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation.

proteinbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 2, column(Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR ↑)
  • Many of these metrics are better when lower, including scRMSD, perplexity and binding energy. The direction comes from the arrow in the paper's own header.
  • Rows such as Native PDBs and RAbD are the natural reference the authors include for scale, not a competing method.
Comparison details and limitations

Every method ProteinBench reports on Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR, scored with AAR on CASP, CAMEO and de novo backbones.

  • Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.

Automated source review: 2026-09-19. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 2 of 2 matching rows.

Tested configuration
0.4620.490.5190.5480.576
Reported score
  1. LM-Design0.57
  2. ProteinMPNN0.468

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
discovery-benchmark-proteinbench
Individual claims		proteinbench primary benchmark evidence

Original source ↗

Table 2, column(Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR ↑)

Version: 2409.06744v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:07:13.231727+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-19

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-proteinbench

Claim: proteinbench-association-if-fitting-evolution-distribution-cameo-aar

Source artifact SHA-256: 4334d636223ad42bfb9ae68aae03f5a255c29ba1cebe7b8f9588fb3b9b5453b2

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: proteinbench-task-if-fitting-evolution-distribution-cameo-aar

areas
proteins-complexes
tasks
Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR
metric
AAR
metric direction
higher
dataset
CASP, CAMEO and de novo backbones
protocol
Inverse folding: recover a sequence for a given backbone. Values are the median over repeated runs.
source locator
Table 2, column(Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR ↑)
comparison panels
id: proteinbench-panel-if-fitting-evolution-distribution-cameo-aar; title: ProteinBench IF-FITTING-EVOLUTION-DISTRIBUTION-CAMEO-AAR: Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR; protocol id: proteinbench-task-if-fitting-evolution-distribution-cameo-aar; dataset id: proteinbench-dataset-casp-cameo-and-de-novo-backbones; metric: aar; unit: score; direction: higher; result ids: proteinbench-result-proteinmpnn-if-fitting-evolution-distribution-cameo-aar-aar; proteinbench-result-lm-design-if-fitting-evolution-distribution-cameo-aar-aar; source ids: expansion-p3-proteinbench; source locator: Table 2, column(Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR ↑); context: Every method ProteinBench reports on Fitting Evolution Distribution, CAMEO AAR, scored with AAR on CASP, CAMEO and de novo backbones.; caveats: Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.; Many of these metrics are better when lower, including scRMSD, perplexity and binding energy. The direction comes from the arrow in the paper's own header.; Rows such as Native PDBs and RAbD are the natural reference the authors include for scale, not a competing method.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-19
Related records

Suggest a correction