Recall (episode-level predictive sensitivity; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture) of Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026) on Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
53·8% Recall (episode-level predictive sensitivity; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
Methods
- Tested configuration
- Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)
- Protocol
- Predictive sensitivity, day -3 to -1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
- Dataset
- Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
- Procedure
- Predictive sensitivity, day -3 to -1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
- Evaluation
- Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Predictive sensitivity, day -3 to -1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
- Coverage
- Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
- Uncertainty
- 95% CI 42.2 to 65.2
- Evidence
- Author-reported evaluation · source checkedPredicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Prediction (day −3 to −1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Sensitivity'
A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.
Reproduction
- Split
- Single cohort
- Adaptation
- Any organism reported by the laboratory counts as positive.
- Scoring implementation
- Proportion of evaluable bloodstream infection episodes in which all organisms identified by blood culture were detected by mcfDNA-Seq in at least one sample from the 3 days before onset.
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Reported result 53·8% Individual claims | Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Prediction (day −3 to −1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Sensitivity' Version: The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript) | source checked ["source-hash-verification","deterministic-table-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-11 author reported Audit detailsRe-downloaded the pinned artifact and matched its SHA-256; compared every value with a separate stdlib parser written for this review (the extractor's script was not run) and checked a stratified sample by hand against the rendered table. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Extraction artifact SHA-256: |
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
1 source record and release history
- Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Original source · The Lancet Microbe 7:101312, published online 2026-03-02; PMC13154368 full-text XML (author manuscript)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-result-prediction-bacterial-raw-sensitivity
- metric
- recall
- metric direction
- higher
- unit
- percent
- printed value
- 53·8%
- numeric value
- 53.8
- metric qualifier
- episode-level predictive sensitivity; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture
- source locator
- Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Prediction (day −3 to −1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Sensitivity'
- numerator
- 42
- denominator
- 78
- uncertainty
- type: confidence_interval; lower: 42.2; upper: 65.2; level: 0.95; printed: (42·2–65·2)
- review
- method: source-hash-verification; deterministic-table-parse; independent-cell-check; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Separate Claude review agent (reviewer-path), independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-11; artifact sha256: 0f6905d0a0c9ace686bcc61970c711558ccf530b5c31f882607a305f8b5ca689; retrieval url: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13154368/fullTextXML; method note: Extracted by deterministic parse of the pinned Europe PMC full-text XML (extract/extract_wolf2026.py), with row and column labels asserted. printed_value is the cell text exactly.; note: Re-downloaded the pinned artifact and matched its SHA-256; compared every value with a separate stdlib parser written for this review (the extractor's script was not run) and checked a stratified sample by hand against the rendered table.