rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

Proportion of evaluable bloodstream infection episodes in which all organisms identified by blood culture were detected by mcfDNA-Seq in at least one sample from the day of or day after onset.

1 evaluation · 18 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

1 recorded evaluation, 18 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

1 evaluation · 18 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2) · Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)

Sorted by Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; all bloodstream infection episodes; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationRecall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; all bloodstream infection episodes; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; all bloodstream infection episodes; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; bacterial bloodstream infections; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; common bloodstream infection pathogens; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; common bloodstream infection pathogens; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; all bloodstream infection episodes; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; all bloodstream infection episodes; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; bacterial bloodstream infections; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; common bloodstream infection pathogens; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; common bloodstream infection pathogens; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Count (evaluable episodes; all bloodstream infection episodes; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Count (evaluable episodes; all bloodstream infection episodes; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Count (evaluable episodes; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Count (evaluable episodes; bacterial bloodstream infections; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Count (evaluable episodes; common bloodstream infection pathogens; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)Count (evaluable episodes; common bloodstream infection pathogens; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Evaluation81·3%83·0%83·1%84·7%81·3%82·9%657364726168808877857582
All 18 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
88 Count (evaluable episodes; all bloodstream infection episodes; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'All bloodstream infection episodes (n=94)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Evaluable episodes'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
73 True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; all bloodstream infection episodes; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'All bloodstream infection episodes (n=94)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Positive'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
83·0% Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; all bloodstream infection episodes; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 73.4 to 90.1

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'All bloodstream infection episodes (n=94)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
80 Count (evaluable episodes; all bloodstream infection episodes; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'All bloodstream infection episodes (n=94)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Evaluable episodes'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
65 True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; all bloodstream infection episodes; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'All bloodstream infection episodes (n=94)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Positive'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
81·3% Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; all bloodstream infection episodes; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 71.0 to 89.1

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'All bloodstream infection episodes (n=94)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
85 Count (evaluable episodes; bacterial bloodstream infections; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Evaluable episodes'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
72 True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; bacterial bloodstream infections; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Positive'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
84·7% Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; bacterial bloodstream infections; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 75.3 to 91.6

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
77 Count (evaluable episodes; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Evaluable episodes'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
64 True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Positive'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
83·1% Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; bacterial bloodstream infections; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 72.9 to 90.7

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Bacterial bloodstream infections (n=91)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
82 Count (evaluable episodes; common bloodstream infection pathogens; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Common bloodstream infection pathogens (n=87)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Evaluable episodes'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
68 True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; common bloodstream infection pathogens; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Common bloodstream infection pathogens (n=87)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Positive'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
82·9% Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; common bloodstream infection pathogens; with logical imputation of missing values; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 73.0 to 90.3

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Common bloodstream infection pathogens (n=87)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'With logical imputation of missing values', column 'Sensitivity'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
75 Count (evaluable episodes; common bloodstream infection pathogens; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Common bloodstream infection pathogens (n=87)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Evaluable episodes'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
61 True positives (episodes with all culture organisms detected; common bloodstream infection pathogens; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Common bloodstream infection pathogens (n=87)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Positive'
Configuration: Karius mcfDNA-Seq, all positive tests (Wolf et al. 2026)Protocol: Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)
Dataset: Bloodstream infection episodes in children and young people with high-risk leukaemia (Wolf et al. 2026)
81·3% Recall (episode-level diagnostic sensitivity; common bloodstream infection pathogens; raw data; reference: organisms identified by blood culture)
percent · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 70.7 to 89.4

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Karius mcfDNA-Seq (all positive tests) on Diagnostic sensitivity, day 0 or 1 (Wolf et al. 2026 Table 2)

dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

Aggregation: Not reported

Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study · Table 2, group 'Common bloodstream infection pathogens (n=87)', row 'Diagnosis (day 0 or 1)', block 'Raw data', column 'Sensitivity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

Author-reported evaluations
1

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: dna-pathogen-20261011-wolf2026-protocol-diagnosis

areas
microbes-communities
contexts
clinical_research
protocol
Proportion of evaluable bloodstream infection episodes in which all organisms identified by blood culture were detected by mcfDNA-Seq in at least one sample from the day of or day after onset. Raw data and logical imputation of missing values are both reported; 95% CIs as printed. The laboratory was masked to sample status.
version
Table 2
source locator
Methods 'Outcomes' and 'Statistical analysis' paragraphs 2-5
limitations
Reference for sensitivity is blood culture, which does not identify every infection; polymicrobial episodes count as detected only if every culture organism is found.
Related records

Suggest a correction