rewire.itbenchmarks
Protocol

BEELINE 2020 Figure 5 · mHSC-L · Reference network: Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq; Gene selection: TFs+1000

Source-specific evaluation. Input conditions: Reference network: Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq; Gene selection: TFs+1000. No equivalence to other releases, protocols or model families is inferred.

6 evaluations · 6 results

Overview

Source-specific evaluation. Input conditions: Reference network: Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq; Gene selection: TFs+1000. No equivalence to other releases, protocols or model families is inferred.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

BEELINE 2020 Figure 5 · mHSC-L · Reference network: Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq; Gene selection: TFs+1000: Early Precision Ratio

Early Precision Ratio (ratio) · Higher values are better.

BEELINE 2020 Figure 5 · mHSC-L · Reference network: Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq; Gene selection: TFs+1000 · mHSC-L

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation.

BEELINE: 10.1038/s41592-019-0690-6 source data published 2020 · Figure 5 source CSV row 15, column 15 through Figure 5 source CSV row 15, column 20
  • Missing source cells and quarantined conflicts are recorded in acquisition and audit tables. Per-result scoring denominators may be unreported.
Comparison details and limitations

Complete selected source table is retained across source-order panels. These point estimates do not establish statistical significance or a universal ranking.

  • Source-specific evaluation. Input conditions: Reference network: Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq; Gene selection: TFs+1000. No equivalence to other releases, protocols or model families is inferred.
  • Exact source-defined evaluation scope; reported scores are not rewire reproductions.

Automated source review: 2026-09-19. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 6 of 6 matching rows.

Tested configuration
-0.06180.2270.5150.8031.09
Reported score
  1. GENIE31.03
  2. SCODE1.03
  3. GRNBOOST21
  4. PPCOR1
  5. PIDC0.98
  6. SINCERITIES0

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

No reviewed evaluations with results linked in this release.

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Seeded random network with matched node universe and density

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Upstream statistical network inference reference

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums

Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
discovery-benchmark-beeline
Individual claims
BEELINE: 10.1038/s41592-019-0690-6 source data published 2020

Original source ↗

Figure 5 source CSV row 15, column 15

Version: 10.1038/s41592-019-0690-6 source data published 2020
Retrieved: 2026-09-19

source checked

ai assisted source review · 2026-09-19

Audit details

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-beeline

Claim: acquired-membership-fbf35d5682e054423594

Source artifact SHA-256: 1f6a38649aa1fc1d90522e3d09f85f7e5714cc80c585ef679ed7603d7a1c7b70

Hash scope: Exact downloaded bytes, before optional gzip storage

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: discovered

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: acquired-protocol-d60261afa2c58e4aa12e

source locator
Figure 5 source CSV row 15, column 15
procedure
BEELINE 2020 Figure 5
comparison panels
id: acquired-figure-a98543b18766eec70a47; title: BEELINE 2020 Figure 5 · mHSC-L · {"reference_network":"Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq","gene_selection":"TFs+1000"}: Early Precision Ratio; protocol id: acquired-protocol-d60261afa2c58e4aa12e; dataset id: acquired-dataset-28bfd0c743b860070fc3; metric: Early Precision Ratio; unit: ratio; direction: higher; result ids: acquired-result-c8e44c97bac612b37f6b; acquired-result-375c67e52ab467e22141; acquired-result-21f27edce93aeb85fcda; acquired-result-6db20d5b56f1566fb405; acquired-result-95066e276ae684a36b27; acquired-result-b5afe69b61cc0288bfd6; source ids: acquired-source-31344fb7e5e8ae6b9666; source locator: Figure 5 source CSV row 15, column 15 through Figure 5 source CSV row 15, column 20; context: Complete selected source table is retained across source-order panels. These point estimates do not establish statistical significance or a universal ranking.; caveats: Source-specific evaluation. Input conditions: {"reference_network":"Cell-type specific ChIP-Seq","gene_selection":"TFs+1000"}. No equivalence to other releases, protocols or model families is inferred.; Exact source-defined evaluation scope; reported scores are not rewire reproductions.; Missing source cells and quarantined conflicts are recorded in acquisition and audit tables. Per-result scoring denominators may be unreported.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-19
scope limitations
Exact source-defined evaluation scope; reported scores are not rewire reproductions.
Related records

Suggest a correction