Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 · docking with ground-truth-centred search box
Source-specific evaluation. Input conditions: docking with ground-truth-centred search box. No equivalence to other releases, protocols or model families is inferred.
Overview
Source-specific evaluation. Input conditions: docking with ground-truth-centred search box. No equivalence to other releases, protocols or model families is inferred.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Results
Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.
All evaluations
1 evaluation · 4 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Vina | Protocol: Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 · docking with ground-truth-centred search box Dataset subset: Plinder-L95 | 100% chirality percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVina · Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries Aggregation: percentage of molecules with consistent chirality Improving Stereochemical Limitations in Protein–Ligand Complex Structure Prediction · Table 1 (XML tbl1); row Vina; column chirality; footnote a |
| Configuration: Vina | Protocol: Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 · docking with ground-truth-centred search box Dataset subset: Plinder-L95 | 0 angle_rmsd degree · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVina · Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries Aggregation: unreported in Table 1 footnote Improving Stereochemical Limitations in Protein–Ligand Complex Structure Prediction · Table 1 (XML tbl1); row Vina; column angle_rmsd; footnote a |
| Configuration: Vina | Protocol: Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 · docking with ground-truth-centred search box Dataset subset: Plinder-L95 | 0 bond_rmsd angstrom · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVina · Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries Aggregation: median Improving Stereochemical Limitations in Protein–Ligand Complex Structure Prediction · Table 1 (XML tbl1); row Vina; column bond_rmsd; footnote a |
| Configuration: Vina | Protocol: Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 · docking with ground-truth-centred search box Dataset subset: Plinder-L95 | 2.21 ligand_rmsd angstrom · lower Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVina · Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries · Plinder-L95 Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries Aggregation: median Improving Stereochemical Limitations in Protein–Ligand Complex Structure Prediction · Table 1 (XML tbl1); row Vina; column ligand_rmsd; footnote a |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Methods and evaluation design
Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations
Evaluation design
Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.
Benchmarks
These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.
Recorded evaluations
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
Baseline coverage
Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.
0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.
No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.
No reviewed evaluations with results linked in this release.
Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.
Null control
Proposed control: requires review
Protocol-specific valid geometric or structural control
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Conventional reference
Proposed control: requires review
Upstream conventional structural reference with matched templates and cutoffs
Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.
This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.
Protocol coverage CSV · Model evaluation matrix · Source table · Release and checksums
Coverage is derived from release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.
Run instructions
No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship: part of discovery-benchmark-plinder Individual claims | Improving Stereochemical Limitations in Protein–Ligand Complex Structure Prediction Table 1 (XML tbl1); row Vina; column ligand_rmsd; footnote a Version: version of record | source checked ai assisted source review · 2026-09-19 Audit detailsField: Claim: acquired-membership-d016495cd0ef76c37b5a Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: discovered
1 source records and release history
- Improving Stereochemical Limitations in Protein–Ligand Complex Structure Prediction · Original source · version of record
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: acquired-protocol-d4acaf69f73675e7a672
- source locator
- Table 1 (XML tbl1); row Vina; column ligand_rmsd; footnote a
- procedure
- Paper-specific Plinder-L95 stereochemistry assessment; Table 1 all entries
- comparison panels
- None recorded
- scope limitations
- Exact source-defined evaluation scope; reported scores are not rewire reproductions.