rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Method

Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)

Scores a stop-gain variant by the number of amino acids lost after the new stop codon.

3 evaluations · 3 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

3 evaluations · 3 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: ClinVar stop-gain pathogenicity by NMD status, ROC-AUC (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 6d, Supplementary Table 2)

Sorted by AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar all stop-gains; zero-shot) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetAUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar all stop-gains; zero-shot)AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar stop-gains expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule); zero-shot)AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule); zero-shot)
Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)EvaluationClinVar stop-gain variants, pathogenic vs benign (Brandes et al. 2023)0.695Not reportedNot reported
Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)EvaluationClinVar stop-gains expected to undergo NMD (Brandes et al. 2023)Not reported0.59Not reported
Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)EvaluationClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (Brandes et al. 2023)Not reportedNot reported0.65
All 3 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Method: Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)Protocol: ClinVar stop-gain pathogenicity by NMD status, ROC-AUC (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 6d, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset subset: ClinVar stop-gains expected to undergo NMD (Brandes et al. 2023)
0.59 AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar stop-gains expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule); zero-shot)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

num. AA lost on stop-gains expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule) (Brandes et al. 2023)

gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-protocol-clinvar-stop-gains

Aggregation: Not reported

Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_stop_gains' cell C3, row 'num. AA lost', column 'AUC_NMD'
Method: Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)Protocol: ClinVar stop-gain pathogenicity by NMD status, ROC-AUC (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 6d, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset subset: ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (Brandes et al. 2023)
0.65 AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule); zero-shot)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

num. AA lost on stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule) (Brandes et al. 2023)

gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-protocol-clinvar-stop-gains

Aggregation: Not reported

Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_stop_gains' cell B3, row 'num. AA lost', column 'AUC_no_NMD'
Method: Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)Protocol: ClinVar stop-gain pathogenicity by NMD status, ROC-AUC (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 6d, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ClinVar stop-gain variants, pathogenic vs benign (Brandes et al. 2023)
0.695 AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar all stop-gains; zero-shot)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

num. AA lost on all stop-gains (Brandes et al. 2023)

gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-protocol-clinvar-stop-gains

Aggregation: Not reported

Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_stop_gains' cell D3, row 'num. AA lost', column 'AUC_ALL'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6.

Use this method

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-method-residues-lost-count

areas
protein-function
contexts
clinical_research
method types
conventional_pipeline
reported name
num. AA lost
entity level
method
source locator
Methods 'Baseline scores of indel and stop-gain variant effects'
missing metadata
version: reason: inapplicable; note: Baseline defined in the article's Methods
Related records

Suggest a correction