rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Result

AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule); zero-shot) of Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline) on ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (Brandes et al. 2023)

0.65 AUROC (ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule); zero-shot)

Methods

Tested method
Number of residues lost (stop-gain baseline)
Protocol
ClinVar stop-gain pathogenicity by NMD status, ROC-AUC (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 6d, Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset subset
ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (Brandes et al. 2023)
Procedure
ClinVar stop-gain pathogenicity by NMD status, ROC-AUC (Brandes et al. 2023 Fig. 6d, Supplementary Table 2)
Evaluation
num. AA lost on stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule) (Brandes et al. 2023)
Coverage
Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty
Not reported by the source
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedBrandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods · Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_stop_gains' cell B3, row 'num. AA lost', column 'AUC_no_NMD'

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Whole labelled set
Adaptation
zero-shot
Scoring implementation
ROC-AUC

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
0.649893290649593
Individual claims
Brandes et al. 2023 Supplementary Table 2: full benchmark evaluations of ESM1b and all other methods

Original source ↗

Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_stop_gains' cell B3, row 'num. AA lost', column 'AUC_no_NMD'

Version: Version of record, Nature Genetics 55, 1512-1522 (published 2023-08-10)
Retrieved: 2026-10-14T12:03:21Z

source checked

["source-hash-verification","deterministic-table-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-14

author reported

Audit details

Extraction: Read the pinned workbook with the stdlib OOXML reader in extract/build_supp2.py; header row and the 4 method labels in column A asserted; 'NaN' cells skipped. Independent review 2026-10-14: matched. The cells use the General format, so printed_value keeps the stored decimal. The value is an exact whole-set ROC-AUC fraction for the Methods class counts (see the protocol limitations).

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 093c32e4156a801c0dd809a437c87818a4f1d04df92e037cf40222471a3e72e2

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Archive member: artifacts/brandes2023-supplementary-table-2.xlsx.gz

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 093c32e4156a801c0dd809a437c87818a4f1d04df92e037cf40222471a3e72e2

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gfm-guides-20261014-esm1b-result-clinvar-stop-gains-no-nmd-residues-lost-count-auroc

printed value
0.649893290649593
numeric value
0.649893290649593
metric
auroc
metric direction
higher
unit
unitless
metric qualifier
ROC-AUC, pathogenic versus benign ClinVar stop-gains not expected to undergo NMD (50 bp rule); zero-shot
source locator
Supplementary Table 2 sheet 'Table_of_results_stop_gains' cell B3, row 'num. AA lost', column 'AUC_no_NMD'
raw xml value
0.649893290649593
printed value basis
Shortest round-trip decimal of the number stored in the workbook cell
missing metadata
uncertainty: reason: unreported
review
method: source-hash-verification; deterministic-table-parse; independent-cell-check; method note: Workbook re-downloaded from the publisher (SHA-256 matches). An independent openpyxl reader matched all 386 results with the cell each locator names (stored value, header, row label, metric) and checked, for head-to-head cells, the system (ESM1b or the comparator whose reported name is the row label), origin, the included flag and note against the comparator configuration, and head2head_n_variants against the subset's scored_count; every numeric cell in the head-to-head columns and the indel and stop-gain sheets was found exactly once. Six cells also checked by hand.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude (Opus 5.5) research agent, independent of the extractor; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-14; artifact sha256: 093c32e4156a801c0dd809a437c87818a4f1d04df92e037cf40222471a3e72e2; retrieval url: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41588-023-01465-0/MediaObjects/41588_2023_1465_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx; note: Extraction: Read the pinned workbook with the stdlib OOXML reader in extract/build_supp2.py; header row and the 4 method labels in column A asserted; 'NaN' cells skipped. Independent review 2026-10-14: matched. The cells use the General format, so printed_value keeps the stored decimal. The value is an exact whole-set ROC-AUC fraction for the Methods class counts (see the protocol limitations).
Related records

Suggest a correction