Scoped author-reported evaluation on the single post-cutoff temporal cohort; read the protocol and cohort limits before comparing to any other retrieval figure.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Fine-tuned MedCPT cross-encoder (passage retrieval) | Protocol: CIViC-Fact v3 within-linked-publication passage retrieval, post-cutoff cohort Dataset: CIViC-Fact v3 post-cutoff temporal-evaluation cohort, 2026-03-03 to 2026-06-09 | 37/40 (92.5%) appropriate_retrieval_rate_postcutoff percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCIViC-Fact v3 post-cutoff within-linked-publication retrieval: fine-tuned MedCPT cross-encoder Not reported Aggregation: Not reported CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) · Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15): '...both the fine-tuned MedCPT model and the 8B Qwen 3 reranker performed similarly retrieving appropriate content for 37 of the remaining 40 entries (92.5%).' |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81.
Not reported
Metadata review: source checked. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
19 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.comparison.adaptation Not reported Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.aggregation Not reported Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.budget Not reported Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.dataset_version Not reported Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.inputs Claim plus the single publication CIViC already links to it; top-5 retrieved passages Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.metric_implementation Manual review judgment of 'appropriate' (sufficient) retrieved content per entry; source-defined, not an automated or recomputed metric. Reviewer count, blinding and replicate/seed structure for this judgment are UNREPORTED; the source's separately described curator/group-consensus process (Methods) covers reference-label assignment for the cohort, not this retrieval judgment, and neither is assumed here. Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.population 40 scored post-cutoff entries (of 42 main-text-eligible, of 66 curator-evaluated, of 150 candidate CIViC entries submitted/revised 2026-03-03 to 2026-06-09) Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.protocol_id ucc-clinical-egfr-protocol-civicfact-v3-retrieval Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.comparison.split Not reported Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.label_reference Manual review of retrieved passages against the claim; not independently adjudicated EGFR/NSCLC clinical ground truth. Reviewer identity/count unreported. Context-only references | CIViC-Fact: a proof-of-concept framework for AI-assisted verification of cancer variant interpretations (bioRxiv v3) Results, 'Passage Retrieval Models Perform Well without Fine-Tuning' subsection (printed page 14 / PDF page 15); selection chain in Methods, 'Temporal evaluation' and Supplementary Figure 2 (printed page 33 / PDF page 34). Version: bioRxiv preprint doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.675443, Version 3, posted 2026-08-29 (per in-document header and bioRxiv API version metadata); published: NA. | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-10-07-1448159e6a81 · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: ucc-clinical-egfr-eval-medcpt-ft-postcutoff