rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Dataset

ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)

Raw untrimmed datasets from patients with encephalitis, respiratory disease or fever, shared with all participants.

Research readiness

These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.

Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9 · Evidence verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Replay metrics

Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • metric replay: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Investigate discrepancies

Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • metric replay: verification is missing
  • annotations: verification is missing
  • dependence: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Run locally

A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • recipe pinned: verification is missing
  • resource estimate: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Evidence incomplete

Validate independently

Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.

Missing or unresolved evidence

  • No verified artifact manifest is linked to this exact record.
  • artifact hashes: verification is missing
  • join integrity: verification is missing
  • score semantics: verification is missing
  • independent validation: verification is missing
  • overlap checked: verification is missing

Verified: Not verified

Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.

Artifacts and reproduction

No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.

Read reviewed discrepancy investigations

Evaluation results

26 evaluations · 299 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Centrifuge as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Centrifuge: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell Q10, row 'Centrifuge', column 'FN (number of PCR-positive hits not reported by mNGS)'
Configuration: Centrifuge as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
0 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Centrifuge: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell O10, row 'Centrifuge', column 'Number of additional viral mNGS hits with negative PCR reprsult (FP* see manuscript text for comments e.g. on index hopping)'
Configuration: Centrifuge as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
14 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Centrifuge: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell R10, row 'Centrifuge', column 'Total mNGS hits with PCR data available (TP+FP)'
Configuration: Centrifuge as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
100% precision
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Centrifuge: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell S10, row 'Centrifuge', column 'Positive predictive value (PPV) [%]'
Configuration: Centrifuge as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
93.3% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Centrifuge: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell T10, row 'Centrifuge', column 'Sensitivity [%], hit level'
Configuration: Centrifuge as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
14 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Centrifuge: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell P10, row 'Centrifuge', column 'TP (viral mNGS hits with positive PCR result, mixed infections counted as double, out of 15 positive PCRs)'
Configuration: DAMIAN as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
3 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DAMIAN: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell Q15, row 'DAMIAN', column 'FN (number of PCR-positive hits not reported by mNGS)'
Configuration: DAMIAN as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
0 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DAMIAN: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell O15, row 'DAMIAN', column 'Number of additional viral mNGS hits with negative PCR reprsult (FP* see manuscript text for comments e.g. on index hopping)'
Configuration: DAMIAN as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
12 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DAMIAN: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell R15, row 'DAMIAN', column 'Total mNGS hits with PCR data available (TP+FP)'
Configuration: DAMIAN as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
100% precision
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DAMIAN: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell S15, row 'DAMIAN', column 'Positive predictive value (PPV) [%]'
Configuration: DAMIAN as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
80% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DAMIAN: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell T15, row 'DAMIAN', column 'Sensitivity [%], hit level'
Configuration: DAMIAN as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
12 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Evaluation origin not reported · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DAMIAN: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell P15, row 'DAMIAN', column 'TP (viral mNGS hits with positive PCR result, mixed infections counted as double, out of 15 positive PCRs)'
Configuration: DIAMOND as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
2 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DIAMOND: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell Q17, row 'DIAMOND', column 'FN (number of PCR-positive hits not reported by mNGS)'
Configuration: DIAMOND as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DIAMOND: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell O17, row 'DIAMOND', column 'Number of additional viral mNGS hits with negative PCR reprsult (FP* see manuscript text for comments e.g. on index hopping)'
Configuration: DIAMOND as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
14 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DIAMOND: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell R17, row 'DIAMOND', column 'Total mNGS hits with PCR data available (TP+FP)'
Configuration: DIAMOND as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
92.9% precision
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DIAMOND: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell S17, row 'DIAMOND', column 'Positive predictive value (PPV) [%]'
Configuration: DIAMOND as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
86.7% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DIAMOND: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell T17, row 'DIAMOND', column 'Sensitivity [%], hit level'
Configuration: DIAMOND as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
13 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DIAMOND: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell P17, row 'DIAMOND', column 'TP (viral mNGS hits with positive PCR result, mixed infections counted as double, out of 15 positive PCRs)'
Configuration: DNAstar as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DNAstar: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell Q20, row 'DNAstar', column 'FN (number of PCR-positive hits not reported by mNGS)'
Configuration: DNAstar as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
6 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DNAstar: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell O20, row 'DNAstar', column 'Number of additional viral mNGS hits with negative PCR reprsult (FP* see manuscript text for comments e.g. on index hopping)'
Configuration: DNAstar as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
21 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DNAstar: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell R20, row 'DNAstar', column 'Total mNGS hits with PCR data available (TP+FP)'
Configuration: DNAstar as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
71.4% precision
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DNAstar: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell S20, row 'DNAstar', column 'Positive predictive value (PPV) [%]'
Configuration: DNAstar as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
100% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DNAstar: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell T20, row 'DNAstar', column 'Sensitivity [%], hit level'
Configuration: DNAstar as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
15 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

DNAstar: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell P20, row 'DNAstar', column 'TP (viral mNGS hits with positive PCR result, mixed infections counted as double, out of 15 positive PCRs)'
Configuration: FEVIR as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

FEVIR: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell Q23, row 'FEVIR', column 'FN (number of PCR-positive hits not reported by mNGS)'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9.

Dataset and evaluation context

A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

18 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
attributes.access
Public download at https://veb.lumc.nl/CliniMG; part also via the COMPARE Data Hub
Context-only references
Benchmark of thirteen bioinformatic pipelines for metagenomic virus diagnostics using datasets from clinical samples

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1 (2021-05-08), JATS XML; published as J Clin Virol 141:104908 (doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104908)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.access

Source artifact SHA-256: 735ce2e42ae5fe6f5a198bdc14fd2e92ef27fc1d3734d2137a3c86d24480c718

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.access
Public download at https://veb.lumc.nl/CliniMG; part also via the COMPARE Data Hub
Context-only references
de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1, supplementary file media-1.xlsx (sheets SuppS2, SuppS3, SuppS4)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:56Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.access

Source artifact SHA-256: be0ea61fcffe8ea580077467ca19ef1ac39e88bbc82d916bc65b58a6683214f6

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.assay
Brain biopsies: TruSeq stranded mRNA, NextSeq 500 81 bp paired; other samples: total nucleic acid with EAV and PhHV controls, NEBNext Ultra directional RNA library adapted for DNA and RNA, NextSeq 500 or NovaSeq 6000 150 bp paired; three CSF samples with vertebrate-virus capture probes; human reads removed with Bowtie2 2.3.4
Context-only references
Benchmark of thirteen bioinformatic pipelines for metagenomic virus diagnostics using datasets from clinical samples

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1 (2021-05-08), JATS XML; published as J Clin Virol 141:104908 (doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104908)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.assay

Source artifact SHA-256: 735ce2e42ae5fe6f5a198bdc14fd2e92ef27fc1d3734d2137a3c86d24480c718

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.assay
Brain biopsies: TruSeq stranded mRNA, NextSeq 500 81 bp paired; other samples: total nucleic acid with EAV and PhHV controls, NEBNext Ultra directional RNA library adapted for DNA and RNA, NextSeq 500 or NovaSeq 6000 150 bp paired; three CSF samples with vertebrate-virus capture probes; human reads removed with Bowtie2 2.3.4
Context-only references
de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1, supplementary file media-1.xlsx (sheets SuppS2, SuppS3, SuppS4)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:56Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.assay

Source artifact SHA-256: be0ea61fcffe8ea580077467ca19ef1ac39e88bbc82d916bc65b58a6683214f6

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.denominator
13
Context-only references
Benchmark of thirteen bioinformatic pipelines for metagenomic virus diagnostics using datasets from clinical samples

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1 (2021-05-08), JATS XML; published as J Clin Virol 141:104908 (doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104908)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.denominator

Source artifact SHA-256: 735ce2e42ae5fe6f5a198bdc14fd2e92ef27fc1d3734d2137a3c86d24480c718

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.denominator
13
Context-only references
de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1, supplementary file media-1.xlsx (sheets SuppS2, SuppS3, SuppS4)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:56Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.denominator

Source artifact SHA-256: be0ea61fcffe8ea580077467ca19ef1ac39e88bbc82d916bc65b58a6683214f6

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.population
13 samples: CSF (4), brain biopsy (3), nasopharyngeal swab (3), nasal washing (1), BAL (1), plasma (1); 15 PCR-positive targets (two mixed infections), 10 RNA viruses and 5 DNA viruses (HHV-6A, HHV-6B, EBV twice, adenovirus).
Context-only references
Benchmark of thirteen bioinformatic pipelines for metagenomic virus diagnostics using datasets from clinical samples

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1 (2021-05-08), JATS XML; published as J Clin Virol 141:104908 (doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104908)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.population

Source artifact SHA-256: 735ce2e42ae5fe6f5a198bdc14fd2e92ef27fc1d3734d2137a3c86d24480c718

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.population
13 samples: CSF (4), brain biopsy (3), nasopharyngeal swab (3), nasal washing (1), BAL (1), plasma (1); 15 PCR-positive targets (two mixed infections), 10 RNA viruses and 5 DNA viruses (HHV-6A, HHV-6B, EBV twice, adenovirus).
Context-only references
de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1, supplementary file media-1.xlsx (sheets SuppS2, SuppS3, SuppS4)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:56Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.population

Source artifact SHA-256: be0ea61fcffe8ea580077467ca19ef1ac39e88bbc82d916bc65b58a6683214f6

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.source_locator
Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9
Context-only references
Benchmark of thirteen bioinformatic pipelines for metagenomic virus diagnostics using datasets from clinical samples

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1 (2021-05-08), JATS XML; published as J Clin Virol 141:104908 (doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104908)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:27Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: 735ce2e42ae5fe6f5a198bdc14fd2e92ef27fc1d3734d2137a3c86d24480c718

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

attributes.source_locator
Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9
Context-only references
de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4

Original source ↗

Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9

Shared locator for this statement’s cited sources; not a separate locator for each citation.

Version: medRxiv 2021.05.04.21256618 version 1, supplementary file media-1.xlsx (sheets SuppS2, SuppS3, SuppS4)
Retrieved: 2026-10-09T20:15:56Z

not individually reviewed

No individual claim review recorded

Audit details

Field: attributes.source_locator

Source artifact SHA-256: be0ea61fcffe8ea580077467ca19ef1ac39e88bbc82d916bc65b58a6683214f6

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-8cc1db47c7f9 · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: rna-pathogen-20261009-data-devries2021-ennngs-13-clinical

areas
microbes-communities
contexts
clinical_research
version
Datasets as shared for the ENNGS benchmark (https://veb.lumc.nl/CliniMG)
access
Public download at https://veb.lumc.nl/CliniMG; part also via the COMPARE Data Hub
population
13 samples: CSF (4), brain biopsy (3), nasopharyngeal swab (3), nasal washing (1), BAL (1), plasma (1); 15 PCR-positive targets (two mixed infections), 10 RNA viruses and 5 DNA viruses (HHV-6A, HHV-6B, EBV twice, adenovirus).
assay
Brain biopsies: TruSeq stranded mRNA, NextSeq 500 81 bp paired; other samples: total nucleic acid with EAV and PhHV controls, NEBNext Ultra directional RNA library adapted for DNA and RNA, NextSeq 500 or NovaSeq 6000 150 bp paired; three CSF samples with vertebrate-virus capture probes; human reads removed with Bowtie2 2.3.4
split
No split
denominator
13
source locator
Methods 'Datasets' paragraphs 1-3 and 'Data sharing'; Supplementary Table 2 rows 4-9
Related records

Suggest a correction