Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
7 evaluations · 21 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Sourmash | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.932 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSourmash: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Sourmash, column F1 score; XML row6 column4 |
| Configuration: Lemur + Magnet | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.95 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLemur + Magnet: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur + Magnet, column Precision; XML row3 column3 |
| Configuration: Kraken 2 | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.055 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken 2: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Kraken 2, column Precision; XML row8 column3 |
| Configuration: Lemur + Magnet | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.938 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLemur + Magnet: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur + Magnet, column F1 score; XML row3 column4 |
| Configuration: Lemur | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.703 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLemur: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur, column Precision; XML row2 column3 |
| Configuration: Melon | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.946 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMelon: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Melon, column F1 score; XML row4 column4 |
| Configuration: Lemur | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.808 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLemur: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur, column F1 score; XML row2 column4 |
| Configuration: Lemur + Magnet | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.927 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLemur + Magnet: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur + Magnet, column Recall; XML row3 column2 |
| Configuration: Sourmash | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.927 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSourmash: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Sourmash, column Recall; XML row6 column2 |
| Configuration: Centrifuger | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.774 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuger: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Centrifuger, column Recall; XML row7 column2 |
| Configuration: Lemur | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.951 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceLemur: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Lemur, column Recall; XML row2 column2 |
| Configuration: Kraken 2 | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.976 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken 2: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Kraken 2, column Recall; XML row8 column2 |
| Configuration: Melon | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.929 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMelon: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Melon, column Precision; XML row4 column3 |
| Configuration: MetaMaps | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.862 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetaMaps: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Precision; XML row5 column3 |
| Configuration: Melon | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.963 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMelon: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Melon, column Recall; XML row4 column2 |
| Configuration: MetaMaps | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 1 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetaMaps: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2 |
| Configuration: Centrifuger | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.05 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuger: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Centrifuger, column Precision; XML row7 column3 |
| Configuration: Sourmash | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.938 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceSourmash: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Sourmash, column Precision; XML row6 column3 |
| Configuration: Kraken 2 | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.104 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceKraken 2: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Kraken 2, column F1 score; XML row8 column4 |
| Configuration: MetaMaps | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.926 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetaMaps: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column F1 score; XML row5 column4 |
| Configuration: Centrifuger | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.093 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCentrifuger: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row Centrifuger, column F1 score; XML row7 column4 |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
A dataset supplies biological observations. The evaluation protocol defines how those observations are split, used and scored.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
6 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.reported_population Not reported Context-only references | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.source_locator Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Context-only references | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.split 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Context-only references | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.subset Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Context-only references | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| description Dataset and cohort used in the cited comparison. Dataset population counts do not establish successful prediction coverage. Context-only references | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| name Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Context-only references | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:: Recall, Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: paper-dataset-e8eb310c5d40e647ac