Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Configuration
MetaMaps
MetaMaps as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
Sources
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2Overview
Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.
limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details
Evaluations and results
1 evaluation · 3 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: MetaMaps | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.862 Precision fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetaMaps: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Precision; XML row5 column3 |
| Configuration: MetaMaps | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 1 Recall fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetaMaps: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2 |
| Configuration: MetaMaps | Protocol: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads (Long-read taxonomic profiling) Dataset: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads | 0.926 F1 score fraction · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Result quoted from another source · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceMetaMaps: Species profiling on Dilthey2019 simulated long reads Species-level recall/precision/F 1. MetaMaps results copied from original manuscript; other tool versions reported in Methods. 200,114 reads;96 strain design,94 strains with RefSeq species representatives; average read 4,997 bp. Aggregation: Not reported Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column F1 score; XML row5 column4 |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
How it works
Evaluation in this paper
Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
Sources
Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Strengths and limitations
Limitations and conditions
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Profile review details
Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.
Stable record: paper-model-193c149a4a8339ee57Specifications
Inputs, training, access and other details
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Model type | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Inputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Outputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Parameters | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Known versions | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Training data | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Context limits | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Access | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Code licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Weights licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation in this paper Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2 Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Introduction MetaMaps as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims | Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2 Version: PMC archival version PMC11185576.2 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
1 source records and release history
- Lightweight taxonomic profiling of long-read metagenomic datasets with Lemur and Magnet · Original source · PMC archival version PMC11185576.2
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: paper-model-193c149a4a8339ee57
- areas
- microbes-communities
- tasks
- Long-read taxonomic profiling
- entity level
- method
- configuration type
- reported_configuration
- version
- Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
- legacy kinds
- model
- entity classification
- review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: part2-lemur-magnet-2024; source locator: Table 1:, row MetaMaps, column Recall; XML row5 column2; ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.