Jores tobacco-leaves gc-motif-linear
R lm(): GC plus maximum motif scores for six core elements and 72 TF motifs.
Overview
R lm(): GC plus maximum motif scores for six core elements and 72 TF motifs.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
1 evaluation · 1 result. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Jores tobacco-leaves gc-motif-linear | Protocol: Jores 2021 promoter strength: tobacco-leaves Dataset subset: Jores 10% promoter holdout: tobacco-leaves | 0.51 pearson_r_squared dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceJores tobacco-leaves gc-motif-linear Not reported Aggregation: Not reported Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models · Figure 8a, tobacco-leaves panel; p849 Computational models predict and improve promoter strength |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
Related profile: Jores GC and motif linear regression. This page retains the exact record and its evaluation context.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship: variant of uc20260930-method-jores-gc-and-motif-linear-regression Individual claims | Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models Computational modelling of promoter strength; Figure 8a,b Version: Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00 Audit detailsField: Claim: uc20260930-config-family-698c5df3938a8279 Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models · Original source · Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: uc20260930-jores-config-tobacco-leaves-gc-motif-linear
- areas
- dna-genomes
- source locator
- See linked evaluation and result locators
- missing metadata
- checkpoint hash: unextracted
- review
- method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex experimental-use-case curation; date: 2026-09-30; reviewed at: 2026-09-30T21:40:59.576893+00:00; scope: Primary-source transcription and catalogue applicability audit; not human scientific review or independent experimental reproduction.
Related records
- variant of: Jores GC and motif linear regression
- subject: Jores tobacco-leaves gc-motif-linear family identity
- configuration: GC and motif linear-regression baseline: tobacco-leaves
- configuration: Jores tobacco-leaves gc-motif-linear