Held-out 10% of measured promoters, pooled species; STARR-seq with 35S enhancer in the dark. Target is log2 enrichment normalised to 35S minimal promoter, averaged over two replicates.
These checks assess whether the evidence supports a reproducible investigation. A source-checked score alone does not meet these requirements.
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Evidence verified: Not verified
Exact outcomes, predictions, identifiers and evaluator are connected.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Replay evidence includes annotations and an assessment of dependence. Unknown independence permits descriptive analysis only.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
A pinned recipe describes the inputs, environment and resource requirements.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Separate data and exposure records support an independent test.
Missing or unresolved evidence
Verified: Not verified
Readiness describes the evidence in this release. Availability on your computer is checked separately when an investigation runs. Existing data exposure can prevent independent validation even when files are available.
No verified artifact manifest is connected to this record yet. The gaps above identify what is needed before analysis can begin.
2 evaluations · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Jores tobacco-leaves cnn | Protocol: Jores 2021 promoter strength: tobacco-leaves Dataset subset: Jores 10% promoter holdout: tobacco-leaves | 0.71 pearson_r_squared dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models · Figure 8b, tobacco-leaves panel; p849 Computational models predict and improve promoter strength |
| Configuration: Jores tobacco-leaves gc-motif-linear | Protocol: Jores 2021 promoter strength: tobacco-leaves Dataset subset: Jores 10% promoter holdout: tobacco-leaves | 0.51 pearson_r_squared dimensionless · higher Uncertainty: type: unreported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceJores tobacco-leaves gc-motif-linear Not reported Aggregation: Not reported Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models · Figure 8a, tobacco-leaves panel; p849 Computational models predict and improve promoter strength |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.
This record describes a particular subset or cohort used in an evaluation. Its results do not describe the full dataset.
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
4 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.source_locator Computational modelling of promoter strength; Computational methods Context-only references | Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models Computational modelling of promoter strength; Computational methods Version: Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| attributes.split 90% train / 10% held out Context-only references | Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models Computational modelling of promoter strength; Computational methods Version: Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| description Held-out 10% of measured promoters, pooled species; STARR-seq with 35S enhancer in the dark. Target is log2 enrichment normalised to 35S minimal promoter, averaged over two replicates. Context-only references | Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models Computational modelling of promoter strength; Computational methods Version: Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| name Jores 10% promoter holdout: tobacco-leaves Context-only references | Jores et al. 2021 plant core promoter models Computational modelling of promoter strength; Computational methods Version: Nature Plants 7:842–855, 2021; author-hosted version of record | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked
Stable ID: uc20260930-jores-data-tobacco-leaves