Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study
Talos with high-level phenotype-match filter required.
Overview
Talos with high-level phenotype-match filter required.
Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.
Evaluations and results
6 evaluations · 30 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Filter evaluations
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG full Dataset: Talos ACG full evaluation cohort | 419 candidate_variants count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: total Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG full, strict, Candidate variants |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG full Dataset: Talos ACG full evaluation cohort | 1 candidates_per_proband variants per proband · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG full, strict, Candidates per proband |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG full Dataset: Talos ACG full evaluation cohort | 2.4 candidates_per_recovered_diagnosis variants per diagnosis · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG full, strict, Candidates per diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG full Dataset: Talos ACG full evaluation cohort | 173 recovered_known_diagnoses count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG full, strict, Diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG full Dataset: Talos ACG full evaluation cohort | 83% known_diagnosis_recovery percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG full, strict, Diagnoses (%) |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG singleton Dataset: Talos ACG singleton evaluation cohort | 491 candidate_variants count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: total Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG singleton, strict, Candidate variants |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG singleton Dataset: Talos ACG singleton evaluation cohort | 1.2 candidates_per_proband variants per proband · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG singleton, strict, Candidates per proband |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG singleton Dataset: Talos ACG singleton evaluation cohort | 3 candidates_per_recovered_diagnosis variants per diagnosis · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG singleton, strict, Candidates per diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG singleton Dataset: Talos ACG singleton evaluation cohort | 160 recovered_known_diagnoses count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG singleton, strict, Diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG singleton Dataset: Talos ACG singleton evaluation cohort | 77% known_diagnosis_recovery percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG singleton, strict, Diagnoses (%) |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG trio Dataset: Talos ACG trio evaluation cohort | 403 candidate_variants count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: total Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG trio, strict, Candidate variants |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG trio Dataset: Talos ACG trio evaluation cohort | 1.1 candidates_per_proband variants per proband · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG trio, strict, Candidates per proband |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG trio Dataset: Talos ACG trio evaluation cohort | 2.5 candidates_per_recovered_diagnosis variants per diagnosis · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG trio, strict, Candidates per diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG trio Dataset: Talos ACG trio evaluation cohort | 164 recovered_known_diagnoses count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG trio, strict, Diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: ACG trio Dataset: Talos ACG trio evaluation cohort | 83% known_diagnosis_recovery percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, ACG trio, strict, Diagnoses (%) |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP full Dataset: Talos RGP full evaluation cohort | 582 candidate_variants count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: total Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP full, strict, Candidate variants |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP full Dataset: Talos RGP full evaluation cohort | 0.8 candidates_per_proband variants per proband · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP full, strict, Candidates per proband |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP full Dataset: Talos RGP full evaluation cohort | 7.6 candidates_per_recovered_diagnosis variants per diagnosis · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP full, strict, Candidates per diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP full Dataset: Talos RGP full evaluation cohort | 77 recovered_known_diagnoses count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP full, strict, Diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP full Dataset: Talos RGP full evaluation cohort | 83% known_diagnosis_recovery percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP full, strict, Diagnoses (%) |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP singleton Dataset: Talos RGP singleton evaluation cohort | 777 candidate_variants count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: total Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP singleton, strict, Candidate variants |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP singleton Dataset: Talos RGP singleton evaluation cohort | 1.1 candidates_per_proband variants per proband · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP singleton, strict, Candidates per proband |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP singleton Dataset: Talos RGP singleton evaluation cohort | 9.9 candidates_per_recovered_diagnosis variants per diagnosis · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: table ratio Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP singleton, strict, Candidates per diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP singleton Dataset: Talos RGP singleton evaluation cohort | 78 recovered_known_diagnoses count · unknown Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP singleton, strict, Diagnoses |
| Configuration: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study | Protocol: Talos diagnosis recovery and workload: RGP singleton Dataset: Talos RGP singleton evaluation cohort | 84% known_diagnosis_recovery percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceNot reported Aggregation: Not reported Talos Table 1: complete evaluation cohort outcomes · Table 1, RGP singleton, strict, Diagnoses (%) |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d.
Use this model
How it works, versions and access
Related profile: Talos. This page retains the exact record and its evaluation context.
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship: variant of uc-clinical-20260930-method-talos Individual claims | Automated reanalysis of genomic data for rare disease diagnostics at scale Results and Methods; Talos workflow Version: Nature Medicine 2026 final publication, 24 June 2026 | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-30 Audit detailsTranscription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review. Field: Claim: uc-clinical-20260930-association-talos-strict Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-30-e37e3ab1284d · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- Automated reanalysis of genomic data for rare disease diagnostics at scale · Original source · Nature Medicine 2026 final publication, 24 June 2026
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: uc-clinical-20260930-talos-strict
- areas
- dna-genomes
- contexts
- clinical_research
- review
- method: automated_source_review; reviewer: Codex clinical coverage worker; date: 2026-09-30; note: Transcription from inspected primary source. No execution, independent replication or human scientific review.; source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-talos
- missing metadata
- software commit: not extracted
- parent identity review
- source id: uc-clinical-20260930-source-talos; source locator: Results and Methods; Talos workflow; method: automated_source_review
Related records
- variant of: Talos
- subject: Configuration identity: Talos strict phenotype-match filtering, 2026 study
- configuration: Talos strict: ACG full
- configuration: Talos strict: ACG singleton
- configuration: Talos strict: ACG trio
- configuration: Talos strict: RGP full
- configuration: Talos strict: RGP singleton
- configuration: Talos strict: RGP trio