rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)

VirMet as used at a participating diagnostic laboratory, with its own reference database and reporting criteria.

2 evaluations · 23 results

Overview

VirMet as used at a participating diagnostic laboratory, with its own reference database and reporting criteria.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

2 evaluations · 23 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell Q42, row 'VirMet', column 'FN (number of PCR-positive hits not reported by mNGS)'
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1 false-positive-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell O42, row 'VirMet', column 'Number of additional viral mNGS hits with negative PCR reprsult (FP* see manuscript text for comments e.g. on index hopping)'
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
15 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell R42, row 'VirMet', column 'Total mNGS hits with PCR data available (TP+FP)'
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
93.3% precision
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell S42, row 'VirMet', column 'Positive predictive value (PPV) [%]'
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
93.3% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell T42, row 'VirMet', column 'Sensitivity [%], hit level'
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Virus hits against RT-PCR: true and false positives, PPV and hit-level sensitivity (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 4)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
14 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: virus hits against RT-PCR (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-hit-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 4, cell P42, row 'VirMet', column 'TP (viral mNGS hits with positive PCR result, mixed infections counted as double, out of 15 positive PCRs)'
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
12 true-positive-count
count · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell R79, row 'VirMet', column 'Number of samples correctly positive ... out of 13 samples*'
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
56 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell C79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 1 (HHV-6(A))
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
26100 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell D79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 2 (HHV-6(B))
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
26100 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell E79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 3 (Enterovirus)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
26000 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell F79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 4 (EBV)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
102000 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell G79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 5 (Mumps)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1790000 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell H79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 6 (CoV-OC43)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1320 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell I79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 7 (Astrovirus VA1)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
546 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell J79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 8 (Inf-A)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
54 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell K79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 9 (PIV-3)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1420 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell L79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 10 (CoV-NL63)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
7060 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell M79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 11 (CoV-NL63)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
0 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell N79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 11 (CoV-HKU-1)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
1900 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell O79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 12 (CoV-HKU-1)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
96 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell P79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 13 (Adeno-virus)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
7 count
count · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell Q79, row 'VirMet' read count, column sample 13 (EBV)
Configuration: VirMet as run by an ENNGS laboratory (de Vries et al. 2021)Protocol: Detection of RT-PCR-positive viruses per sample, with assigned read counts (de Vries et al. 2021 Supplementary Table 2)
Dataset: ENNGS benchmark: 13 clinical metagenomic datasets with RT-PCR results (de Vries et al. 2021)
92.3% recall
percent · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

VirMet: sample-level detection (ENNGS)

rna-pathogen-20261009-protocol-devries2021-sample-level

Aggregation: Not reported

de Vries et al. medRxiv preprint v1, Supplementary Tables 2-4 · Supplementary Table 2, cell S79, row 'VirMet', column 'Overall sensitivity [%], sample level'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-09-ba02f2f4a36e · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: rna-pathogen-20261009-config-devries2021-virmet

areas
microbes-communities
contexts
clinical_research
method types
conventional_pipeline
reported name
VirMet
source locator
Supplementary Table 2 cell A79; Methods 'Bioinformatic pipelines'
foundation model eligible
false
missing metadata
version: reason: unextracted; note: Pipeline details are in Table 1, which is an image in the preprint and was not transcribed
parameters
Own reference database and reporting criteria of the participating laboratory (Table 1, not transcribed)
Related records

Suggest a correction