rewire.itbenchmarks
Configuration

Combined

Combined as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

SourcesEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Val Accuracy; XML row4 column2

1 evaluation · 7 results

Overview

Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details

Evaluations and results

1 evaluation · 7 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
0.85 ± 0.021 MCC
dimensionless · higher

Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.021

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Aggregation: Not reported

Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column MCC; XML row4 column6
Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
0.99 ± 0.004 Specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.004

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Aggregation: Not reported

Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Specificity; XML row4 column4
Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
0.97 ± 0.004 Weighted F1
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.004

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Aggregation: Not reported

Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Weighted F1; XML row4 column5
Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
0.97 ± 0.004 Val Accuracy
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.004

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Aggregation: Not reported

Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Val Accuracy; XML row4 column2
Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
0.92 ± 0.013 AUPRC
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.013

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Aggregation: Not reported

Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column AUPRC; XML row4 column7
Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
0.83 ± 0.045 Sensitivity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.045

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Aggregation: Not reported

Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Sensitivity; XML row4 column3
Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
0.97 AUROC
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Aggregation: Not reported

Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column AUROC; XML row4 column8

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access

How it works

Evaluation in this paper

Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label

SourcesEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Val Accuracy; XML row4 column2
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Stable record: paper-model-f2cef2e59da25c476f

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Inputs, outputs and configuration
PropertyDescription and evidence
Model typeNot extracted or verified for this record.
InputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
OutputsNot extracted or verified for this record.
ParametersNot extracted or verified for this record.
Known versionsNot extracted or verified for this record.
Training dataNot extracted or verified for this record.
Context limitsNot extracted or verified for this record.
AccessNot extracted or verified for this record.
Code licenceNot extracted or verified for this record.
Weights licenceNot extracted or verified for this record.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

2 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Evaluation in this paper
Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
Individual claims
Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features

Original source ↗

Table 1., row Combined, column Val Accuracy; XML row4 column2

Version: preprint version in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:15.123850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.sections.0.body

Source artifact SHA-256: b76fff917addd0e9ff8a2fc843496132ecf832d3ceef248e3edf2dbc78baab5f

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Introduction
Combined as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
Individual claims
Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features

Original source ↗

Table 1., row Combined, column Val Accuracy; XML row4 column2

Version: preprint version in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:15.123850+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-17

Audit details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Field: attributes.profile.summary

Source artifact SHA-256: b76fff917addd0e9ff8a2fc843496132ecf832d3ceef248e3edf2dbc78baab5f

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-model-f2cef2e59da25c476f

areas
proteins-complexes
tasks
vaccine-antigen candidate prediction
entity level
method
configuration type
reported_configuration
version
Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
legacy kinds
model
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped entry preserves the method/configuration actually named in an evaluation. It is neither a global family identity nor proof of an immutable checkpoint; the linked evaluation retains adaptation, fitting and scoring details.; source ids: part2-vaxign-esm-2024; source locator: Table 1., row Combined, column Val Accuracy; XML row4 column2; ambiguities: Configuration means the source-labelled evaluated identity. It does not establish missing checkpoint hashes, default settings or equivalence to same-named records in other papers.
Related records

Suggest a correction