0.97 ± 0.004 Weighted F1
Combined: Weighted F1 on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- Tested configuration
- Combined
- Protocol
- Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
- Dataset
- Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- Procedure
- Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
- Evaluation
- Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- Coverage
- scored: unreported; eligible: unreported
- Uncertainty
- type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.004
- Evidence
- Author-reported evaluation · source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Weighted F1; XML row4 column5
A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.
Reproduction
- Split
- 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
- Adaptation
- Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
- Scoring implementation
- Not reported
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Reported result 0.97 ± 0.004 Individual claims | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1., row Combined, column Weighted F1; XML row4 column5 Version: preprint version in PMC | source checked Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review · 2026-09-17 author reported Audit detailsSource checked does not mean experimentally reproduced. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Sources and history
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked
1 source records and release history
- Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Original source · preprint version in PMC
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: paper-result-6314ca1ea38e3cc0b5
- areas
- proteins-complexes
- tasks
- vaccine-antigen candidate prediction
- printed value
- 0.97 ± 0.004
- numeric value
- 0.97
- metric
- Weighted F1
- metric direction
- higher
- unit
- fraction
- uncertainty
- type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.004
- eligible count
- Not reported
- scored count
- Not reported
- reported population
- Not reported
- source locator
- Table 1., row Combined, column Weighted F1; XML row4 column5
- source occurrences
- source id: part2-vaxign-esm-2024; locator: Table 1., row Combined, column Weighted F1; XML row4 column5
- review
- method: Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review; date: 2026-09-17; note: Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.
- missing metadata
- scored count: unreported; eligible count: unextracted; checkpoint revision: unextracted; uncertainty: inapplicable