Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
ESM2 8M as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
Key specifications have not been extracted for this record. See the linked evaluation and sources for the reported setup.
limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. All specifications and missing details
1 evaluation · 4 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
Applied filters: All linked evaluations
| Tested configuration | Protocol and dataset | Finding | Evidence and details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration: ESM2 8M | Protocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification) Dataset: human and viral proteins | 92.2% Prec. percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceESM2 8M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Aggregation: Not reported Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column Prec.; XML row4 column4 |
| Configuration: ESM2 8M | Protocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification) Dataset: human and viral proteins | 92.3% Recall percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceESM2 8M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Aggregation: Not reported Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column Recall; XML row4 column5 |
| Configuration: ESM2 8M | Protocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification) Dataset: human and viral proteins | 98.1% AUROC percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceESM2 8M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Aggregation: Not reported Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column AUC (%); XML row4 column2 |
| Configuration: ESM2 8M | Protocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification) Dataset: human and viral proteins | 94.7% Accur. percent · higher Uncertainty: Not reported Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Author-reported evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceESM2 8M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Aggregation: Not reported Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column Accur.; XML row4 column3 |
Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.
Related profile: ESM-2. This page retains the exact record and its evaluation context.
Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.
Stable record: paper-model-6cb80dfa2a3b65637aExplanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Model type | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Inputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Outputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Parameters | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Known versions | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Training data | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Context limits | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Access | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Code licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Weights licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
4 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation in this paper Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims | Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column AUC (%); XML row4 column2 Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Introduction ESM2 8M as evaluated in the cited study. Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Individual claims | Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column AUC (%); XML row4 column2 Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Relationship: family catalog-model-esm-2 Individual claims | Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry Methods: pretrained ESM2 variants and fine-tuning; results table row ESM2 8M Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsSource review establishes this relationship only. Exact evaluated configurations and original numerical review status remain unchanged. Original study explicitly distinguishes8M/35M/150M/650M fine-tuned configurations; only the8M row supports the size-qualified target. Field: Claim: model-evaluation-identity-255b8b3c0efd930e09bb Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
| Relationship: family discovery-model-esm-2 Individual claims | Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry Methods: ESM2 models, mean pooling and fine-tuning; result rows 8M/35M/150M/650M Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-23 Audit detailsSource review establishes this relationship only. Exact evaluated configurations and original numerical review status remain unchanged. Source explicitly fine-tunes the pretrained ESM2 models for human-versus-virus protein classification. Preserve parameter size and study split. Field: Claim: model-evaluation-identity-75e1e05d841b1272be29 Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record |
View linked audit checks and correction history
Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review
Stable ID: paper-model-6cb80dfa2a3b65637a