rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)

ESM2 esm2_t33_650M_UR50D scoring missense variants by the logit difference between alternative and reference residues.

5 evaluations · 5 results

Overview

An explanatory profile has not yet been reviewed for this record.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

5 evaluations · 5 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Protocol: ClinVar pathogenic versus benign SNVs within variant type, AUROC (Lu et al. 2025)

Sorted by AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Missense & 3'UTR) (higher is better). The best value in each column is highlighted. Decimals are rounded for display; each value links to the printed value and its source.

Tested configurationProtocol and datasetAUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Missense & 3'UTR)AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Missense & Intron (Non-splice))AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Missense)AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Start loss)AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Stop gain)
ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)EvaluationLu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Missense & 3'UTR (Figure 1)0.878Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)EvaluationLu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Missense & Intron (Non-splice) (Figure 1)Not reported0.818Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)EvaluationLu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Missense (Figure 1)Not reportedNot reported0.886Not reportedNot reported
ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)EvaluationLu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Start loss (Figure 1)Not reportedNot reportedNot reported0.709Not reported
ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)EvaluationLu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Stop gain (Figure 1)Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported0.684
All 5 result rows with coverage, uncertainty and sources
Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)Protocol: ClinVar pathogenic versus benign SNVs within variant type, AUROC (Lu et al. 2025)
Dataset subset: Lu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Missense & Intron (Non-splice) (Figure 1)
0.818 AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Missense & Intron (Non-splice))
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM2 on ClinVar Missense & Intron (Non-splice) SNVs (Lu et al. 2025 Figure 1)

lu-hetero-20261019-protocol-clinvar-variant-type-auroc

Aggregation: Not reported

Genomic heterogeneity inflates the performance of variant pathogenicity predictions (Lu, Liu, Lin and Brandes, bioRxiv 2025, v2) · Figure 1 (page 8), column 3, panel 2 'Missense & Intron (Non-splice) (N=255, %P=17.91%)', row 'ESM2', bar label
Configuration: ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)Protocol: ClinVar pathogenic versus benign SNVs within variant type, AUROC (Lu et al. 2025)
Dataset subset: Lu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Missense & 3'UTR (Figure 1)
0.878 AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Missense & 3'UTR)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM2 on ClinVar Missense & 3'UTR SNVs (Lu et al. 2025 Figure 1)

lu-hetero-20261019-protocol-clinvar-variant-type-auroc

Aggregation: Not reported

Genomic heterogeneity inflates the performance of variant pathogenicity predictions (Lu, Liu, Lin and Brandes, bioRxiv 2025, v2) · Figure 1 (page 8), column 3, panel 3 'Missense & 3'UTR (N=117, %P=40.97%)', row 'ESM2', bar label
Configuration: ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)Protocol: ClinVar pathogenic versus benign SNVs within variant type, AUROC (Lu et al. 2025)
Dataset subset: Lu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Missense (Figure 1)
0.886 AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Missense)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM2 on ClinVar Missense SNVs (Lu et al. 2025 Figure 1)

lu-hetero-20261019-protocol-clinvar-variant-type-auroc

Aggregation: Not reported

Genomic heterogeneity inflates the performance of variant pathogenicity predictions (Lu, Liu, Lin and Brandes, bioRxiv 2025, v2) · Figure 1 (page 8), column 3, panel 1 'Missense (N=50,820, %P=40.09%)', row 'ESM2', bar label
Configuration: ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)Protocol: ClinVar pathogenic versus benign SNVs within variant type, AUROC (Lu et al. 2025)
Dataset subset: Lu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Start loss (Figure 1)
0.709 AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Start loss)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM2 on ClinVar Start loss SNVs (Lu et al. 2025 Figure 1)

lu-hetero-20261019-protocol-clinvar-variant-type-auroc

Aggregation: Not reported

Genomic heterogeneity inflates the performance of variant pathogenicity predictions (Lu, Liu, Lin and Brandes, bioRxiv 2025, v2) · Figure 1 (page 8), column 2, panel 5 'Start loss (N=847, %P=97.53%)', row 'ESM2', bar label
Configuration: ESM2 650M log-likelihood ratio, Brandes et al. pipeline (Lu et al. 2025)Protocol: ClinVar pathogenic versus benign SNVs within variant type, AUROC (Lu et al. 2025)
Dataset subset: Lu et al. 2025 ClinVar benchmark: Stop gain (Figure 1)
0.684 AUROC (ClinVar pathogenic vs benign SNVs, Stop gain)
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ESM2 on ClinVar Stop gain SNVs (Lu et al. 2025 Figure 1)

lu-hetero-20261019-protocol-clinvar-variant-type-auroc

Aggregation: Not reported

Genomic heterogeneity inflates the performance of variant pathogenicity predictions (Lu, Liu, Lin and Brandes, bioRxiv 2025, v2) · Figure 1 (page 8), column 3, panel 4 'Stop gain (N=42,408, %P=98.13%)', row 'ESM2', bar label

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5.

Use this configuration

How it works, versions and access

Additional methodological details, versions and access terms have not yet been extracted into a structured profile for this configuration. Consult the linked sources and evaluation records below.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: lu-hetero-20261019-config-esm2-650m-llr

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
foundation_model
reported name
ESM2
parameters
esm2_t33_650M_UR50D; 1,022 aa context; same stop-gain and start-loss handling as ESM1b.
source locator
Methods 'ESM models' (page 15)
Related records

Suggest a correction