rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Configuration

Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

6 evaluations · 33 results

Overview

Configuration as run in the cited comparison.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

6 evaluations · 33 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.972 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9606 to 0.9830

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C20; group 'BRCA'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.934 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9084 to 0.9602

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E20; group 'BRCA'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.88 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8454 to 0.9139

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D20; group 'BRCA'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.977 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9701 to 0.9839

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C30; group 'CHOL'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.882 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8393 to 0.9241

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E30; group 'CHOL'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.755 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.6938 to 0.8162

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D30; group 'CHOL'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.978 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9704 to 0.9858

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C40; group 'CRC'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.903 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8678 to 0.9389

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E40; group 'CRC'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.845 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8006 to 0.8894

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D40; group 'CRC'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Jiang cohort cross-validation, liver cancer (Table S2)
Dataset: Jiang et al. 2018 plasma WGS, 90 liver cancer and 135 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.944 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9347 to 0.9537

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Jiang cohort liver cancer cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-jiang-lihc-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C90; group 'LIHC'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.997 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9936 to 0.9995

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C60; group 'NSCLC'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.97 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9396 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E60; group 'NSCLC'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.955 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9181 to 0.9919

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D60; group 'NSCLC'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.998 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9964 to 0.9995

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C70; group 'OV'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.99 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9789 to 1.0000

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E70; group 'OV'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.973 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9556 to 0.9911

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D70; group 'OV'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.837 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8026 to 0.8708

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C80; group 'PAAD'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.704 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.6557 to 0.7526

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E80; group 'PAAD'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.584 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.5286 to 0.6398

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D80; group 'PAAD'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.965 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9595 to 0.9710

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C10; group 'PANCAN'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.962 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.9419 to 0.9812

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, C50; group 'STAD'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.922 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8889 to 0.9545

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, E50; group 'STAD'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 Cristiano cohort cross-validation, pan-cancer and seven cancer types (Table S2)
Dataset: DELFI 2019 internally cross-validated cancer detection cohort
0.878 sensitivity-at-95-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.8397 to 0.9169

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), Cristiano cohort cross-validation

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-cristiano-cv-sensitivity

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S2, D50; group 'STAD'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @95% specificity'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.729 auroc
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, C20; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'IFS'; column 'AUC'
Configuration: Integrated fragmentation score (IFS), open chromatin regions, SVM (Hou et al. 2024)Protocol: Hou et al. 2024 independent validation, Mathios et al. LUCAS cohort (Table S3)
Dataset: Mathios et al. 2021 LUCAS cohort, 129 lung cancer and 158 non-cancer (as used by Hou et al. 2024)
0.558 sensitivity-at-85-percent-specificity
fraction · higher

Uncertainty: Not reported by the source

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Author-reported evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

IFS (open chromatin), independent validation on Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)

ctdnafrag-20261009-protocol-hou2024-mathios-lucas-independent

Aggregation: Not reported

Systematically Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns for Cancer Diagnosis and Enhanced Cancer Detection via Integrating Multiple Fragmentation Patterns; Hou et al. 2024, Supporting Information workbook (Tables S1-S15) · Supporting Information sheet S3, E20; data set 'Mathios et al. LUCAS dataset (LUNG)'; row 'IFS'; column 'Sensitivity @85% specificity'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90.

Use this model

How it works, versions and access
Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-7b8f80935f90 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: ctdnafrag-20261009-config-hou2024-ifs-open-chromatin

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
method types
supervised_machine_learning
reported name
IFS
foundation model eligible
false
source locator
Article Table 1 row 'IFS', column 'open chromatin region'; Experimental Section P29-P41
missing metadata
version: reason: unreported; note: Hou et al. re-implementation; no software version or code commit is printed
parameters
Feature setting: open chromatin regions. Classifier: scikit-learn support vector machine with default parameters.
Related records

Suggest a correction