| Configuration: VEST3_c (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA1 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA1 functional truth set: 1641 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by HAP1 cell survival after saturation genome editing | 6.9 benignity-likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (6.31-7.54) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVEST3_c on the BRCA1 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca1 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), G7; tool 'VEST3_c'; column 'BRCA1_negative_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: VEST3_c (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA1 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA1 functional truth set: 1641 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by HAP1 cell survival after saturation genome editing | 37 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVEST3_c on the BRCA1 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca1 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), L70; tool 'VEST3_c'; column 'BRCA1_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: VEST3_c (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA1 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA1 functional truth set: 1641 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by HAP1 cell survival after saturation genome editing | 2.9 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 2.65 to 3.17. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVEST3_c on the BRCA1 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca1 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), F7; tool 'VEST3_c'; column 'BRCA1_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: VEST3_c (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 13.5 benignity-likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (11.5-15.8) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVEST3_c on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), I7; tool 'VEST3_c'; column 'BRCA2_negative_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: VEST3_c (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 2 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVEST3_c on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U70; tool 'VEST3_c'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: VEST3_c (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.67 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.43 to 1.96. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceVEST3_c on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H7; tool 'VEST3_c'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|