| Configuration: alignGVGD_a (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 4.66 benignity-likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (3.77-5.77) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcealignGVGD_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), I10; tool 'alignGVGD_a'; column 'BRCA2_negative_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: alignGVGD_a (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 6 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcealignGVGD_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U2; tool 'alignGVGD_a'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: alignGVGD_a (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.78 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.44 to 2.20. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcealignGVGD_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H10; tool 'alignGVGD_a'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: alignGVGD_b (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 4.03 benignity-likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (3.24-5.01) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcealignGVGD_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), I11; tool 'alignGVGD_b'; column 'BRCA2_negative_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: alignGVGD_b (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 8 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcealignGVGD_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U3; tool 'alignGVGD_b'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: alignGVGD_b (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.87 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.50 to 2.33. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourcealignGVGD_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H11; tool 'alignGVGD_b'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U4; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.14 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.07 to 1.23. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H50; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_MaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U5; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.51 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.33 to 1.72. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_MaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H52; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U6; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 0.992 to 1.02. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H37; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 16.1 benignity-likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (14.4-17.9) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), I38; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_negative_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U7; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.31 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.18 to 1.46. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceBayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H38; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: CADD_phred_a (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD_phred_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U8; tool 'CADD_phred_a'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: CADD_phred_a (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.07 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.02 to 1.13. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD_phred_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H47; tool 'CADD_phred_a'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: CADD_phred_b (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD_phred_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U9; tool 'CADD_phred_b'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: CADD_phred_b (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.02 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 0.996 to 1.05. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCADD_phred_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H60; tool 'CADD_phred_b'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: CHASM (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCHASM on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U10; tool 'CHASM'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: CHASM (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1 to 1. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCHASM on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H64; tool 'CHASM'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: ClinPred (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceClinPred on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U11; tool 'ClinPred'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: ClinPred (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.46 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.29 to 1.65. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceClinPred on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H30; tool 'ClinPred'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|
| Configuration: Concordant calls of PANTHER and MetaSNP (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 0 false-negative-count count · lower Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCombined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U72; tool 'Combined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP'; column 'BRCA2_FN' |
|---|
| Configuration: Concordant calls of PANTHER and MetaSNP (Cubuk et al. 2021) | Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021) Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair | 1.65 likelihood-ratio unitless · higher Uncertainty: CI 1.36 to 2.01. Interval level and method not printed. Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible | Independent external evaluation · Source checkedMethods, coverage and sourceCombined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021) brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2 Aggregation: Not reported Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H81; tool 'Combined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR' |
|---|