rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Protocol

BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)

Positive likelihood ratio, likelihood ratio for benignity and false-negative count for 70 tool-threshold combinations and 14 concordance combinations against the BRCA2 functional truth set.

84 evaluations · 226 results

Overview

Positive likelihood ratio, likelihood ratio for benignity and false-negative count for 70 tool-threshold combinations and 14 concordance combinations against the BRCA2 functional truth set.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

84 recorded evaluations, 226 metric rows. A comparison chart has not yet been validated for these results. The table retains the individual findings and their sources.

View coverage and remaining gaps across all benchmarks

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

84 evaluations · 226 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: alignGVGD_a (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
4.66 benignity-likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (3.77-5.77) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

alignGVGD_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), I10; tool 'alignGVGD_a'; column 'BRCA2_negative_LR'
Configuration: alignGVGD_a (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
6 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

alignGVGD_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U2; tool 'alignGVGD_a'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: alignGVGD_a (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.78 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.44 to 2.20. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

alignGVGD_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H10; tool 'alignGVGD_a'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: alignGVGD_b (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
4.03 benignity-likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (3.24-5.01) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

alignGVGD_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), I11; tool 'alignGVGD_b'; column 'BRCA2_negative_LR'
Configuration: alignGVGD_b (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
8 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

alignGVGD_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U3; tool 'alignGVGD_b'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: alignGVGD_b (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.87 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.50 to 2.33. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

alignGVGD_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H11; tool 'alignGVGD_b'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U4; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.14 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.07 to 1.23. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H50; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U5; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.51 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.33 to 1.72. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H52; tool 'BayesDEL_MaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U6; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 0.992 to 1.02. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H37; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_genespecific'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
16.1 benignity-likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: Sources conflict: Printed interval (14.4-17.9) has the same log-scale width as this row's positive likelihood ratio interval and is not consistent with the Supplementary Table 6 counts; kept in printed_source_cell only.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), I38; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_negative_LR'
Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U7; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.31 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.18 to 1.46. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H38; tool 'BayesDEL_NoMaxAF_universal'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: CADD_phred_a (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CADD_phred_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U8; tool 'CADD_phred_a'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: CADD_phred_a (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.07 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.02 to 1.13. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CADD_phred_a on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H47; tool 'CADD_phred_a'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: CADD_phred_b (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CADD_phred_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U9; tool 'CADD_phred_b'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: CADD_phred_b (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.02 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 0.996 to 1.05. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CADD_phred_b on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H60; tool 'CADD_phred_b'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: CHASM (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CHASM on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U10; tool 'CHASM'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: CHASM (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1 to 1. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

CHASM on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H64; tool 'CHASM'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: ClinPred (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ClinPred on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U11; tool 'ClinPred'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: ClinPred (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.46 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.29 to 1.65. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

ClinPred on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H30; tool 'ClinPred'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'
Configuration: Concordant calls of PANTHER and MetaSNP (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
0 false-negative-count
count · lower

Uncertainty: Not applicable: Count

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 6 (sheet 'SupTable6_Tool_Counts'), U72; tool 'Combined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP'; column 'BRCA2_FN'
Configuration: Concordant calls of PANTHER and MetaSNP (Cubuk et al. 2021)Protocol: BRCA2 functional truth set, binary in silico calls (Cubuk et al. 2021)
Dataset: BRCA2 functional truth set: 188 missense variants classed deleterious or tolerated by Homology-directed repair
1.65 likelihood-ratio
unitless · higher

Uncertainty: CI 1.36 to 2.01. Interval level and method not printed.

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Combined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP on the BRCA2 functional truth set (Cubuk et al. 2021)

brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

Aggregation: Not reported

Clinical likelihood ratios and balanced accuracy for 44 in silico tools against multiple large-scale functional assays of cancer susceptibility genes; Cubuk et al. 2021, Supplementary tables 1-13 (41436_2021_1265_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx) · Supplementary Table 9 (sheet 'SupTable9_Likelihood_Ratios'), H81; tool 'Combined-PANTHER-AND-MetaSNP'; column 'BRCA2_positive_LR'

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-10-10-84341e0b121f.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Baseline coverage

Reference methods help show what a model adds beyond simple controls. We track a null control and a conventional method for each protocol.

0 of 2 active baseline roles have published Rewire measurements in this release. Measurements on a selected protocol do not establish coverage of an entire suite.

No execution recipe linked to this protocol. Recipe availability does not establish a completed evaluation.

External evaluations
84

Literature evidence is not a Rewire measurement. Executed but unpublished runs and private review status are not included.

Null control

Proposed control: requires review

Select a task-valid null control after reviewing inputs and metric

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Conventional reference

Proposed control: requires review

Select an upstream conventional reference after reviewing the full protocol

Protocol-specific applicability, permitted inputs, access, split, evaluator and execution requirements need review before implementation or execution.

This is a suggested selection rule, not a validated method or a measured score.

Protocol coverage CSV (gzip) · Model evaluation matrix (gzip) · Source table (gzip) · Release and checksums (gzip)

Coverage is derived from release 2026-10-10-84341e0b121f. Source citations describe the original records; they do not validate an unreviewed baseline proposal. No results have been generated by this audit.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this protocol. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-10-10-84341e0b121f
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-10-10-84341e0b121f · Record review: source checked

2 source records and release historyDownload this release (gzip)
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: brca-20261009-protocol-cubuk2021-brca2

areas
dna-genomes
contexts
clinical_research
protocol
Each tool's score is dichotomised at the Supplementary Table 5 threshold into deleterious or tolerated and compared with the BRCA2 functional class (HDR score above 2.25 (95% probability of neutrality) tolerated, below 1.78 (95% probability of pathogenicity) deleterious). Likelihood ratios follow Supplementary Table 7.
version
Supplementary Tables 6 and 9
metric
likelihood-ratio
limitations
Functional assay classes are the truth labels, used as proxies for pathogenic and benign; this is not a clinical classification endpoint.; Each tool-threshold combination is a binary call; tools with an intermediate band, and the tool combinations, leave the discordant or intermediate variants out of the counts, so denominators differ between rows (Supplementary Table 6 total_all).; Several tools were trained on ClinVar or HGMD variants, which may include assayed BRCA1/BRCA2 variants; Align-GVGD was trained on BRCA1/2 classifications (Discussion).; Thresholds are the published or commonly used cut-offs in Supplementary Table 5. The BayesDel 'gene-specific' rows use Cubuk et al.'s own thresholds, not the ENIGMA VCEP thresholds used in the existing judgements and in Ramadane-Morchadi et al. 2025.; The source's 'negative likelihood ratio' is TNR/FNR (Supplementary Table 7), stored as benignity-likelihood-ratio, the reciprocal of the conventional negative likelihood ratio. Its printed intervals disagree with the counts in 166 of 168 BRCA1/BRCA2 cells (in 131 they have the width of the row's positive likelihood ratio interval), so they are not recorded as uncertainty; the point values agree.; Where the cell a ratio divides by is zero in Supplementary Table 6, the printed ratio rests only on a zero-cell correction that the Table 9 note says was not applied; those results are disputed and not shown. Other zero-count rows are kept with a note.; Positive likelihood ratio intervals agree with the counts; their level is not printed (95% log-scale reproduces them).; Score versions are given only as the score source (ANNOVAR dbNSFP release or web server, Supplementary Table 5); web servers may have changed since.; The concordance combinations drop discordant variants, so their apparent gains come partly from excluding difficult variants (Discussion).; Only 64 deleterious BRCA2 variants, all in the DNA-binding domain, from a homology-directed repair assay; 25 of 84 rows have zero false negatives.
denominator
188
source locator
Supplementary Tables 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 9 (BRCA2 columns); Methods 'Statistical analysis'
Related records

Suggest a correction