rewirebio.iobenchmarks
Contested result

ESM-2 and CADD: Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026) reverses the order

  • Low severity
  • Not yet reviewed
  • Ordering reversal
  • Different tasks across studies

Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026) ranks CADD above ESM-2 in 14 of 14 comparisons; other studies rank ESM-2 above CADD in 6 of 7.

An automatic lead, not a finding of error. The results below are shown as published, everywhere on the site, until a reviewer decides otherwise.

Which studies agree

Livesey and Marsh 2025 ranks ESM-2 above CADD in 6 of its 7 comparisons and CADD higher in 1. Genome modelling and design across all… ranks CADD above ESM-2 in all 14 of its comparisons.

Papers grouped by which system they rank higher: ESM-2 or CADDRank ESM-2 higher: Livesey and Marsh 2025. Rank CADD higher: Genome modelling and design across all… (disagrees). Mixed: none.Rank ESM-2 higherMixedRank CADD higherLivesey and Marsh 2025Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)Genome modelling anddesign across all…Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026)
  • Rank ESM-2 higher (1): Livesey and Marsh 2025
  • Rank CADD higher (1): Genome modelling and design across all… (disagrees)
  • Mixed (0): none

Each paper sits where at least two thirds of its comparisons point; Mixed means neither model reaches two thirds. The larger, outlined dot is the paper that disagrees.

Comparisons in which each paper scores ESM-2 or CADD higherGenome modelling and design across all… (disagrees): ESM-2 higher in 0, CADD higher in 14, 0 ties. Livesey and Marsh 2025: ESM-2 higher in 6, CADD higher in 1, 0 ties.Disagrees: Genome modelling and design across all…Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026)14 CADD higher14Livesey and Marsh 2025Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)6 ESM-2 higher61 CADD higher1
ESM-2 higherTieCADD higherNumbers are counts of comparisons; the outlined bar is the paper that disagrees.
Comparisons in Genome modelling and design across all… (14)
ProtocolDatasetMetricESM-2CADDHigher
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs), unitless0.8270.952CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs), unitless0.6770.927CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site), unitless0.8220.949CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site), unitless0.6780.925CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved), unitless0.8950.961CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved), unitless0.6570.883CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved), unitless0.620.818CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved), unitless0.7060.905CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site), unitless0.8960.977CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site), unitless0.680.934CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved), unitless0.4930.623CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved), unitless0.7180.88CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved), unitless0.5030.759CADD
Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)ClinVar October 2024 release, filtered (Brixi et al. 2026)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved), unitless0.6960.912CADD
Comparisons in Livesey and Marsh 2025 (7)
ProtocolDatasetMetricESM-2CADDHigher
Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missenseLivesey and Marsh 2025 clinical set: ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD v4.1 missense (819 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each), percent51.452.1CADD
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets), percent72.240.3ESM-2
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against the five top-ranked VEPs (column top_5_winrate; the five are not listed in the table), |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets), percent27.82.89ESM-2
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, direct assays onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, direct DMS assays only), percent74.239ESM-2
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, indirect assays onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, indirect DMS assays only), percent70.841.2ESM-2
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions onlyLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, SNV-accessible substitutions only), percent70.540.3ESM-2
Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions with gaps filledLivesey and Marsh 2025 human DMS benchmark set (36 proteins)Pairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS, SNV-accessible substitutions, missing predictions filled with the VEP's most benign score), percent71.142ESM-2

What disagrees

Other studies
rank ESM-2 above CADD in 6 of 7 comparisons
This study
ranks CADD above ESM-2 in 14 of 14 comparisons
Compared
ESM-2, CADD
Study that disagrees
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026), Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026)
Other studies
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML), Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8)
Rule
Ordering reversal; different tasks across studies
Model identity
Matched across studies partly through links not yet reviewed

The compared numbers

Each value links to its result record and source. Compare values within one protocol; the rule compares rankings, not raw values across protocols.

In the study that disagrees (28)
StudyToolProtocol or benchmarkMetricValue
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs)0.952
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs)0.927
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site)0.949
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site)0.925
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved)0.961
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved)0.883
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved)0.818
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved)0.905
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site)0.977
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site)0.934
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved)0.623
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved)0.88
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved)0.759
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLCADD (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved)0.912
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs)0.827
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs)0.677
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site)0.822
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, far from splice site)0.678
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved)0.895
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, highly conserved)0.657
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved)0.62
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, moderately conserved)0.706
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site)0.896
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, near splice site)0.68
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved)0.493
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, not conserved)0.718
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUPRC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved)0.503
Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Data 1, human variant effect prediction results (Nature 2026); Genome modelling and design across all domains of life with Evo 2: Supplementary Information (Nature 2026); evo2: Journal full-text XMLESM-2 650M (Evo 2 paper variant effect evaluations)Zero-shot ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved classification (Evo 2 paper, Supplementary Data 1)AUROC (zero-shot; ClinVar coding SNVs, poorly conserved)0.696
In the other studies (14)
StudyToolProtocol or benchmarkMetricValue
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missensePairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)52.1
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 clinical benchmark: pairwise AUROC win rate, ClinVar pathogenic versus gnomAD missensePairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, per-protein AUROC on shared variants, ClinVar P/LP versus gnomAD v4.1 missense, proteins with at least 10 of each)51.4
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets)40.3
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against the five top-ranked VEPs (column top_5_winrate; the five are not listed in the table), |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets)2.89
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets)72.2
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, all 36 DMS setsPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against the five top-ranked VEPs (column top_5_winrate; the five are not listed in the table), |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, 36 human DMS sets)27.8
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, direct assays onlyPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, direct DMS assays only)39
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, direct assays onlyPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, direct DMS assays only)74.2
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, indirect assays onlyPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, indirect DMS assays only)41.2
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, indirect assays onlyPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, indirect DMS assays only)70.8
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions onlyPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, SNV-accessible substitutions only)40.3
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions onlyPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS on shared variants, SNV-accessible substitutions only)70.5
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)CADD_1.7 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions with gaps filledPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS, SNV-accessible substitutions, missing predictions filled with the VEP's most benign score)42
Livesey and Marsh 2025, Supplementary Material 2 (Tables S1-S8); Livesey and Marsh 2025, Genome Biology 26:104 (Europe PMC full text XML)ESM2 (Livesey and Marsh 2025)Livesey and Marsh 2025 DMS benchmark: pairwise |Spearman| win rate, SNV-accessible substitutions with gaps filledPairwise win rate (average pairwise win rate against all other VEPs, |Spearman| with DMS, SNV-accessible substitutions, missing predictions filled with the VEP's most benign score)71.1

Follow-up

Current state: Not yet reviewed.

No one has reviewed this finding yet.

How to help resolve this

If you know why these studies disagree, for example a different population, metric or preprocessing step, or you have a corrected value, tell us through the contribution form. A reviewer checks every submission against its source before anything changes, and the step is added to the follow-up above.

Finding discrepancy-48b2c903acfca584 · All contested results · How findings are made and followed up