rewire.itbenchmarks
Task

Enhancer-target gene prediction

Enhancer-target classification tests whether sequence models distinguish experimentally annotated interaction candidates.

SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

2 evaluations · 2 results

Overview

Datasets

K562 enhancer-promoter candidate pairs with positive and negative annotations from prior studies.

Metrics

AUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification.

Allowed inputs

Long genomic sequence context for enhancer/target-gene pairs.

SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
Evaluation procedure diagram
How it worksComputational evaluation flow
Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Long genomic sequence context for enhancer/target-gene pairs.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Downstream DNA-model prediction compared with a CNN and the activity-by-contact expert model.. Then: 3. Readout: AUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Long genomic sequence context for enhancer/target-gene pairs.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Downstream DNA-model prediction compared with a CNN and the activity-by-contact expert model.. Then: 3. Readout: AUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Long genomic sequence context for enhancer/target-gene pairs.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Downstream DNA-model prediction compared with a CNN and the activity-by-contact expert model.. Then: 3. Readout: AUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification.

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. All specifications and missing details

Results

Results are available, but no reviewed comparison panel is linked in this release.

All evaluations

2 evaluations · 2 results. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Filter evaluations

Applied filters: All linked evaluations

Exact evaluated configurations and original reported results
Tested configurationProtocol and datasetFindingEvidence and details
Configuration: HyenaDNATask: Enhancer-target gene prediction
Dataset: DNALongBench ETGP
0.828 AUROC
unitless · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

HyenaDNA: Enhancer-target gene prediction

Long-range ETGP benchmark; source table reports AUROC.

Aggregation: Not reported

DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Table 3, HyenaDNA row, ETGP column
Configuration: Caduceus-PhTask: Enhancer-target gene prediction
Dataset: DNALongBench ETGP
0.826 AUROC
unitless · unknown

Uncertainty: Not reported

Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible

Independent external evaluation · Source checked
Methods, coverage and source

Caduceus-Ph: Enhancer-target gene prediction

Long-range ETGP benchmark; source table reports AUROC.

Aggregation: Not reported

DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Table 3, Caduceus-Ph row, ETGP column

Source checking is not independent reproduction. Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220.

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

How it works

Evaluation methodology

K562 enhancer-promoter candidate pairs with positive and negative annotations from prior studies. The enhancer-target task paragraph identifies the curated K562 pairs and evaluation metric but does not state its partition assignment; nearby split descriptions belong to other tasks. AUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification. A compact CNN and DNA foundation models are compared with the activity-by-contact expert model. The enhancer-target paragraph does not establish gene- or overlapping-interval-disjoint partitions; unrelated task split rules cannot be imported. The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.

SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

  • The activity-by-contact comparator receives functional assays and chromatin-contact data that sequence-only models do not. Splits described for other DNALongBench tasks are not imported into this record.
    SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
Profile review details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Stable record: reported-task-2cbac97dd849f5

Specifications

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsK562 enhancer-promoter candidate pairs with positive and negative annotations from prior studies.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
SplitsThe enhancer-target task paragraph identifies the curated K562 pairs and evaluation metric but does not state its partition assignment; nearby split descriptions belong to other tasks. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
MetricsAUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
BaselinesA compact CNN and DNA foundation models are compared with the activity-by-contact expert model.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
Leakage controlsThe enhancer-target paragraph does not establish gene- or overlapping-interval-disjoint partitions; unrelated task split rules cannot be imported. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
UncertaintyThe cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
Entity typePaper-specific computational evaluation protocol.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
OrganismsHuman K562.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
AssaysEnhancer–promoter link annotations.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
Allowed inputsLong genomic sequence context for enhancer/target-gene pairs.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48
AdaptationDownstream DNA-model prediction compared with a CNN and the activity-by-contact expert model.
SourcesDNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks · Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.

Paper or primary resourceVersionReference
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction TasksPMC11741265.1Read source
Historical gaps recorded on 2026-09-17

The catalogue now holds 2 result rows for this benchmark. A note below about pending extraction describes the state on 2026-09-17 and may since have been answered by a later batch. The result rows and their sources are the current record.

  • complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.
  • exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.
Search and extraction details

primary comparison tables located

Searches

  • DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks 10.1101/2025.01.06.631595

Evidence locations

  • Table 3:; XML table T3

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption
Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps
  • Input: Long genomic sequence context for enhancer/target-gene pairs.
  • Evaluation: Downstream DNA-model prediction compared with a CNN and the activity-by-contact expert model.
  • Readout: AUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title
Computational evaluation flow
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Datasets
K562 enhancer-promoter candidate pairs with positive and negative annotations from prior studies.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Splits
The enhancer-target task paragraph identifies the curated K562 pairs and evaluation metric but does not state its partition assignment; nearby split descriptions belong to other tasks.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Adaptation
Downstream DNA-model prediction compared with a CNN and the activity-by-contact expert model.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Metrics
AUROC for enhancer-promoter interaction classification.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Baselines
A compact CNN and DNA foundation models are compared with the activity-by-contact expert model.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Leakage controls
The enhancer-target paragraph does not establish gene- or overlapping-interval-disjoint partitions; unrelated task split rules cannot be imported.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Uncertainty
The cited text-accessible evaluation sections give no confidence-interval, resampling or repeat-run error-bar specification. Image-only tables and uninspected supplements are outside this absence claim.
Individual claims
DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks

Original source ↗

Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48

Version: PMC11741265.1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:16.492545+00:00

unreported

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Task-specific computational methodology and field context checked in the cited primary-source artifact. Source-backed fields, inapplicable evaluator dimensions and unresolved details are distinguished. Numerical results were not reproduced.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: fa440a17cecf16a5d872d50a30910f7591b5f6f78e10a944c6bda5ea8d7e32dd

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: needs review

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-2cbac97dd849f5

areas
dna-genomes
tasks
Enhancer-target gene prediction
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
Enhancer-target gene prediction
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: primary_comparison_tables_located; primary sources: evidence-expansion-dnalongbench-2025-fa440a17; inspected locators: Table 3:; XML table T3; searched queries: DNALongBench: A Benchmark Suite for Long-Range DNA Prediction Tasks 10.1101/2025.01.06.631595; gaps: complete numerical transcription and independent cell review: Full primary artifact and table inventory preserved; no new numeric row is published from this audit alone.; exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.; claim scope: Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped record identifies the biological prediction task and holds its paper context. Preserve the existing task identity; exact split, model adaptation and scoring remain in linked evaluations or separate protocol records.; source ids: dnalongbench-2025; source locator: Proposed Dataset: enhancer-promoter interactions; Experiments; cached text lines 27–28, 48; ambiguities: A paper- or suite-specific task may constrain some inputs or metrics; that alone does not make it interchangeable with a complete versioned protocol. No protocol equivalence is inferred.; Some legacy profile Entity type facts use the generic phrase computational evaluation protocol. That boilerplate is not sufficient to establish a single fixed protocol identity or to merge this task with another protocol record.
Related records

Suggest a correction