rewire.itbenchmarks
← Back to results
Task

PFMBench STABILITY: TAPE_Stability

TAPE_Stability. Scored with Spearman on TAPE_Stability. Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1.

12 evaluations · 12 results

Overview

TAPE_Stability. Scored with Spearman on TAPE_Stability. Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Results

Each comparison retains its reviewed evaluation scope, dataset and metric. Results are shown without a pooled ranking.

PFMBench STABILITY: TAPE_Stability

spearman (correlation) · Higher values are better.

PFMBench STABILITY: TAPE_Stability · TAPE_Stability (PFMBench split)

Evidence origin: Author-reported evaluation.

pfmbench primary benchmark evidence · Table 1, row(TAPE_Stability)
  • The metric differs by task, taken from Table 1, so these figures cannot be averaged into one score.
  • Table 3 scores come from adapter fine-tuning; the ProteinGym figure is zero-shot and is not comparable to them.
Comparison details and limitations

Every method PFMBench reports on TAPE_Stability, scored with Spearman on TAPE_Stability.

  • Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.

Automated source review: 2026-09-18. Numerical source review does not establish independent reproduction.

Dots show point estimates. Whiskers show only explicitly defined uncertainty (standard deviation, standard error or a labelled interval); their definitions remain in Table. Unresolved uncertainty is not plotted. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Showing 12 of 12 matching rows.

Tested configuration
-1-0.500.51
Reported score
  1. VenusPLM0.339
  2. PGLM0 .33127
  3. ESM-20.321
  4. ESM-C0.3
  5. DPLM0.294
  6. SaProt0.248
  7. ProtT50.186
  8. ESM30.157
  9. ProtGPT20.148
  10. ProstT50.13
  11. ProtST0.0662
  12. ProTrek0.0492

Methods and evaluation design

Procedure, tasks and evaluated configurations

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Strengths, limitations and unresolved questions

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of
discovery-benchmark-pfmbench
Individual claims		pfmbench primary benchmark evidence

Original source ↗

Table 1, row(TAPE_Stability)

Version: 2506.14796v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T21:06:29.716004+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-18

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-pfmbench

Claim: pfmbench-association-stability

Source artifact SHA-256: 59c7bbb888e8e91f33c1e2cabfde062c32381d6ca727d23b6655c977aabf97a2

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: pfmbench-task-stability

areas
proteins-complexes
tasks
TAPE_Stability
metric
Spearman
metric direction
higher
dataset
TAPE_Stability
protocol
Fine-tuned with an adapter under the PFMBench harness; train, validation and test counts are in Table 1.
source locator
Table 1, row(TAPE_Stability)
comparison panels
id: pfmbench-panel-stability; title: PFMBench STABILITY: TAPE_Stability; protocol id: pfmbench-task-stability; dataset id: pfmbench-dataset-tape-stability; metric: spearman; unit: correlation; direction: higher; result ids: pfmbench-result-esm-2-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-venusplm-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-esm-c-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-protgpt2-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-pglm-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-prott5-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-dplm-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-saprot-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-prostt5-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-protst-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-esm3-stability-spearman; pfmbench-result-protrek-stability-spearman; source ids: expansion-p3-pfmbench; source locator: Table 1, row(TAPE_Stability); context: Every method PFMBench reports on TAPE_Stability, scored with Spearman on TAPE_Stability.; caveats: Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.; The metric differs by task, taken from Table 1, so these figures cannot be averaged into one score.; Table 3 scores come from adapter fine-tuning; the ProteinGym figure is zero-shot and is not comparable to them.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-18
Related records

Suggest a correction