Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4; mean of the Table 10 dataset rows) of CNN (GenBench) on GenBench Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction
0.607 Accuracy (task-level value as printed in Table 4; mean of the Table 10 dataset rows)
Methods
- Tested configuration
- CNN (GenBench)
- Protocol
- GenBench Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction
- Dataset
- GenBench Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction
- Procedure
- GenBench Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction
- Evaluation
- CNN on GenBench Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction
- Coverage
- Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
- Uncertainty
- Not reported by the source
- Evidence
- Independent external evaluation · source checkedGenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Table 4, row 'Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction', column 'CNN'
A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.
Reproduction
- Split
- GenBench split
- Adaptation
- Trained
- Scoring implementation
- Not reported
No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.
Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.
Evidence
Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.
Evidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Reported result 0.6071 Individual claims | GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models Table 4, row 'Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction', column 'CNN' Version: arXiv 2406.01627 version 2 | source checked ["source-hash-verification","pdf-text-parse","independent-cell-check","rendered-source-visual-check"] · 2026-10-11 independent paper Audit detailsExtraction: Parsed the pdftotext -layout text of the pinned arXiv PDF with tools/extract_genbench.py; header model names and row labels asserted per table. Table 4, row 'Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction', column 'CNN' Independent review 2026-10-11: value, locator, metric, unit, direction and linked configuration and protocol checked; corrections from the review applied by the extractor as listed in review.md. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Extraction artifact SHA-256: |
Sources and history
Release 2026-10-22-1b7cf027e4f6 · Record review: source checked
1 source record and release history
- GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models · Original source · arXiv 2406.01627 version 2
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: lit-genomics-20261011-genbench-result-cnn-short-yeast-epigenetic-marks-prediction
- metric
- accuracy
- metric direction
- higher
- unit
- fraction
- printed value
- 0.6071
- source locator
- Table 4, row 'Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction', column 'CNN'
- review
- method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; independent-cell-check; rendered-source-visual-check; method note: Matched the re-downloaded arXiv v2 PDF's SHA-256; an independent parser compared all results across Tables 3-8 and 10 with 0 mismatches; a seeded stratified sample of 61 cells was checked against rendered pages 6, 7 and 15.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude review agent reviewer-gen-2, independent of the extractor lit-genomics; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-11; artifact sha256: 24105d26b25a6adf7509334b041d44e145d5006dfedf87e812e12138fa154f12; retrieval url: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.01627v2; note: Extraction: Parsed the pdftotext -layout text of the pinned arXiv PDF with tools/extract_genbench.py; header model names and row labels asserted per table. Table 4, row 'Yeast Epigenetic Marks Prediction', column 'CNN' Independent review 2026-10-11: value, locator, metric, unit, direction and linked configuration and protocol checked; corrections from the review applied by the extractor as listed in review.md.
- numeric value
- 0.6071
- metric qualifier
- task-level value as printed in Table 4; mean of the Table 10 dataset rows
- missing metadata
- uncertainty: reason: unreported