rewire.itbenchmarks
Result

67.5% mcc

DNABERT-2 (further pre-trained on GUE) · GUE CORE-PROMOTER-DETECTION-ALL · MCC

Tested configuration
DNABERT-2 (further pre-trained on GUE)
Task
GUE CORE-PROMOTER-DETECTION-ALL: Core promoter detection, dataset all
Dataset subset
GUE Core promoter detection, all (GUE split)
Related family profiles
DNABERT-2
Procedure
Fine-tuned on the GUE training split, scored on its test split. Split sizes are in Table 12.
Evaluation
DNABERT-2 (further pre-trained on GUE) on GUE CORE-PROMOTER-DETECTION-ALL: Core promoter detection, dataset all
Coverage
scored: unreported; eligible: unreported
Uncertainty
Not reported
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedDNABERT-2: Efficient Foundation Model and Benchmark for Multi-Species Genomes · Table 6, row(DNABERT-2♦), column(Core promoter detection all)

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split
Not reported
Adaptation
Not reported
Scoring implementation
MCC

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result
67.50
Individual claims
DNABERT-2: Efficient Foundation Model and Benchmark for Multi-Species Genomes

Original source ↗

Table 6, row(DNABERT-2♦), column(Core promoter detection all)

Version: Primary full-text snapshot retrieved 2026-09-17; exact bytes pinned by SHA-256
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T08:06:28.183387+00:00

source checked

Deterministic parse of the pinned PDF text layer, with every column heading asserted against the expected list · 2026-09-18

author reported

Audit details

Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: 49300acee3e4afd44bebc3de9893c3bc310d331bd4805374e0952fdfbf366f06

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Extraction artifact SHA-256: 49300acee3e4afd44bebc3de9893c3bc310d331bd4805374e0952fdfbf366f06

Extraction artifact

Sources and history

View linked audit checks and correction history

Release 2026-09-29-06401fd5b220 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gue-result-dnabert-2-further-pre-trained-on-gue-core-promoter-detection-all-mcc

areas
dna-genomes
tasks
Core promoter detection, dataset all
metric
mcc
metric direction
higher
unit
percent
printed value
67.50
numeric value
67.50
uncertainty
Not reported
source locator
Table 6, row(DNABERT-2♦), column(Core promoter detection all)
missing metadata
denominator: unextracted; seeds: unreported
review
method: Deterministic parse of the pinned PDF text layer, with every column heading asserted against the expected list; reviewer: Codex research agent; no human review claimed; date: 2026-09-18; artifact sha256: 49300acee3e4afd44bebc3de9893c3bc310d331bd4805374e0952fdfbf366f06; retrieval url: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.15006; notes: Source checked, not reproduced. Metrics differ by task, so no composite score across tasks is computed or implied.
Related records

Suggest a correction