Result

Accuracy (16-class long-sequence RVDB dataset) of BLAST 2.12.0 blastn, top hit (Bůžková et al. 2026) on RVDB C-RVDB v31.0 long-sequence dataset, 16 classes

0.977 Accuracy (16-class long-sequence RVDB dataset)

Methods

Tested configuration: BLAST 2.12.0 blastn, top hit (Bůžková et al. 2026)
Protocol: RVDB long-sequence viral classification, 16 classes (Bůžková et al. 2026 Table 10)
Dataset: RVDB C-RVDB v31.0 long-sequence dataset, 16 classes
Procedure: RVDB long-sequence viral classification, 16 classes (Bůžková et al. 2026 Table 10)
Evaluation: BLAST (blastn) on the RVDB long-sequence dataset, 16 classes
Coverage: Not reported scored / Not reported eligible
Uncertainty: 95% CI 0.950 to 0.989. Wilson binomial interval quoted in Section 3.8; method stated in Section 2.9
Evidence: Independent external evaluation · source checkedAnalyzing Genomic Foundation Models for Viral Sequence Identification · Table 10, row 'BLAST (blastn)', column 'Accuracy'

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: source checked. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Reproduction

Split: About 4 indexed and about 16 queried sequences per class
Adaptation: None: BLAST database built from the training FASTA, max_target_seqs = 1
Scoring implementation: Accuracy, balanced accuracy, MCC and macro-averaged F1, precision and recall

No execution recipe has been verified for this exact configuration and evaluation. A benchmark's general instructions may use different inputs, splits or model settings.

Reproducing this published result requires matching its model configuration, data, split and scorer. Source checking or a successful smoke test does not establish score reproduction.

Evidence

Source checking verifies the cited claim or transcription. It does not establish independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Reported result 0.9766 Individual claims	Analyzing Genomic Foundation Models for Viral Sequence Identification Original source ↗ Table 10, row 'BLAST (blastn)', column 'Accuracy' Version: bioRxiv v1, posted 2026-09-28 Retrieved: 2026-10-11T00:48:35Z	source checked ["source-hash-verification","pdf-text-parse","independent-cell-check"] · 2026-10-11 independent paper Audit details Independent review 2026-10-11: value and identity match the source. Corrected in review: uncertainty changed from unreported to the 95% Wilson interval 0.950 to 0.989 (Section 3.8). Field: `attributes.printed_value` Source artifact SHA-256: `9a589a2088f8466502b1035228db3e594065e984e5755c25d907471225f75c19` Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record Inspected artifact Extraction artifact SHA-256: `9a589a2088f8466502b1035228db3e594065e984e5755c25d907471225f75c19` Extraction artifact

How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-11-02-a7f03c9e55a5 · Record review: source checked

1 source record and release history

Analyzing Genomic Foundation Models for Viral Sequence Identification · Original source · bioRxiv v1, posted 2026-09-28

Download this release (gzip)

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: gfm2-20261011-buzkova2026-result-t10-blastn-accuracy

metric: accuracy
metric direction: higher
unit: fraction
printed value: 0.9766
numeric value: 0.9766
source locator: Table 10, row 'BLAST (blastn)', column 'Accuracy'
metric qualifier: 16-class long-sequence RVDB dataset
review: method: source-hash-verification; pdf-text-parse; independent-cell-check; method note: Re-downloaded the bioRxiv PDF (byte stream differs per request in the preprint banner; the text layer is identical) and matched the archived copy to the pinned SHA-256. Parsed the table from the `pdftotext -layout` text with a separate parser (review/review.py) and checked printed value, numeric value, metric, qualifier, unit, direction, locator and the linked configuration, protocol and dataset against the row and column headers and Sections 2 and 3.; reviewer: claude; reviewer note: Claude (Opus 5.5) review agent reviewer-gfm-a, independent of the extractor lit-gfm-2; no human review claimed; date: 2026-10-11; artifact sha256: 9a589a2088f8466502b1035228db3e594065e984e5755c25d907471225f75c19; retrieval url: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.25.754388v1.full.pdf; note: Independent review 2026-10-11: value and identity match the source. Corrected in review: uncertainty changed from unreported to the 95% Wilson interval 0.950 to 0.989 (Section 3.8).
uncertainty: type: confidence_interval; printed: 0.950 to 0.989; lower: 0.950; upper: 0.989; level: 0.95; method: analytic; note: Wilson binomial interval quoted in Section 3.8; method stated in Section 2.9

Related records

evaluation: BLAST (blastn) on the RVDB long-sequence dataset, 16 classes

Suggest a correction